Poll: What is the most overrated sport

[SuburbanFarmer]

You read the post, I included a data point based on net worth to show the phenomenon wasn't just about income, there is big turnover in capital too. You just can't fucking read.

Here it is again dumbass:


Would you like to keep pretending it's me who can't read instead of you? Or do you want to stop making yourself look like even more of a moron?

"and their heirs"

That is another tactic I already mentioned. When a hugely successful industrialist dies and his will divides the assets to four or five adult children, the family collectively might retain the wealth, but the stats only look at the families of the individual adult inheritors, which is obviously around 1/4 or lower, depending on the number of children.

That is not a burnout.

This why citing things on an internet forum is pointless. No one changes their mind, and they will reach for all kind of excuses to ignore data and stick to their confirmation bias. StA is the prime example. The heirs do not account for a 71% turnover rate at all, and StA is being a complete clown to suggest that is the case, with no data to back up that baseless assumption.

Citations don't change minds, they just result in cognitive dissonance out the whazoo from those who disagree.

You need to re-evaluate, based on what you just received as feedback. They’re valid points.

Also, looking only at the top 400 out of 300 million isn’t a valid statement on the state of free market capitalism.

[StCapps]

"and their heirs"

That is another tactic I already mentioned. When a hugely successful industrialist dies and his will divides the assets to four or five adult children, the family collectively might retain the wealth, but the stats only look at the families of the individual adult inheritors, which is obviously around 1/4 or lower, depending on the number of children.

That is not a burnout.

This why citing things on an internet forum is pointless. No one changes their mind, and they will reach for all kind of excuses to ignore data and stick to their confirmation bias. StA is the prime example. The heirs do not account for a 71% turnover rate at all, and StA is being a complete clown to suggest that is the case, with no data to back up that baseless assumption.

Citations don't change minds, they just result in cognitive dissonance out the whazoo from those who disagree.

You need to re-evaluate, based on what you just received as feedback. They’re valid points.

Also, looking only at the top 400 out of 300 million isn’t a valid statement on the state of free market capitalism.

They are not good points, and that's the last time I cite anything for you, because you don't give two shits about actual data unless it conforms to your confirmation bias. You are not a reasonable person, no amount of data that indicates your conclusion to be incorrect will ever be accepted, no matter how persuasive.

You need to re-evaluate, but you won't. No citations for you.

[Smitty-48]

This why citing things on an internet forum is pointless. No one changes their mind, and they will reach for all kind of excuses to ignore data and stick to their confirmation bias. StA is the prime example. The heirs do not account for a 71% turnover rate at all, and StA is being a complete clown to suggest that is the case, with no data to back up that baseless assumption.

Citations don't change minds, they just result in cognitive dissonance out the whazoo from those who disagree.

You need to re-evaluate, based on what you just received as feedback. They’re valid points.

Also, looking only at the top 400 out of 300 million isn’t a valid statement on the state of free market capitalism.

They are not good points, and that's the last time I cite anything for you, because you don't give two shits about actual data unless it conforms to your confirmation bias.

Exactly, citing things to a SubhumanCockroachFarmer SoyBoi is a fool's errand.

He's just a stupid asshole, in every single thread : "ZOMG Zerohedge"

Gas the Millennials, put them in the ovens.

[SuburbanFarmer]

This why citing things on an internet forum is pointless. No one changes their mind, and they will reach for all kind of excuses to ignore data and stick to their confirmation bias. StA is the prime example. The heirs do not account for a 71% turnover rate at all, and StA is being a complete clown to suggest that is the case, with no data to back up that baseless assumption.

Citations don't change minds, they just result in cognitive dissonance out the whazoo from those who disagree.

You need to re-evaluate, based on what you just received as feedback. They’re valid points.

Also, looking only at the top 400 out of 300 million isn’t a valid statement on the state of free market capitalism.

They are not good points, and that's the last time I cite anything for you, because you don't give two shits about actual data unless it conforms to your confirmation bias. You are not a reasonable person, no amount of data that indicates your conclusion to be incorrect will ever be accepted, no matter how persuasive.

You need to re-evaluate, but you won't. No citations for you.

You pasted some statistics. They were refuted pretty quickly.

Both sides have merit, but very little hard evidence.

Or just throw people in ovens or some other boomer drivel.

[StCapps]

You need to re-evaluate, based on what you just received as feedback. They’re valid points.

Also, looking only at the top 400 out of 300 million isn’t a valid statement on the state of free market capitalism.

They are not good points, and that's the last time I cite anything for you, because you don't give two shits about actual data unless it conforms to your confirmation bias. You are not a reasonable person, no amount of data that indicates your conclusion to be incorrect will ever be accepted, no matter how persuasive.

You need to re-evaluate, but you won't. No citations for you.

You pasted some statistics. They were refuted pretty quickly.

Both sides have merit, but very little hard evidence.

Or just throw people in ovens or some other boomer drivel.

They were not refuted, StA is just a retard, but because he agrees with you, you think they were refuted. Both sides do not have merit, you just want to go on believing your rich people are holding back the poor dogma.

[Smitty-48]

Or just throw people in ovens or some other boomer drivel.

OK Snowflake.

[StCapps]

Or just throw people in ovens or some other boomer drivel.

OK Snowflake.

Snowflakes don't last very long in ovens.

[Smitty-48]

Or just throw people in ovens or some other boomer drivel.

OK Snowflake.

Snowflakes don't last very long in ovens.

Millennials; they make the Hippies look like Hoplites in comparison.

Mind you, avocado is good on toast, I'll give them that.

Right before we gas them and put them in the ovens.

[StCapps]

OK Snowflake.

Snowflakes don't last very long in ovens.

Millennials; they make the Hippies look like Hoplites in comparison.

Mind you, avocado is good on toast, I'll give them that.

Right before we gas them and put them in the ovens.

Thanks for the Avacado toast Millenials, now to the ovens with you.

Shotty going last.

[Smitty-48]

Snowflakes don't last very long in ovens.

Millennials; they make the Hippies look like Hoplites in comparison.

Mind you, avocado is good on toast, I'll give them that.

Right before we gas them and put them in the ovens.

Thanks for the Avacado toast Millenials, now to the ovens with you.

Shotty going last.