-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Wed Nov 13, 2019 9:49 am
Fife wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 9:37 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 9:22 am
I must have missed the bit where anyone (communist or not) was calling for him to be prosecuted, perhaps you could point it out for me.
I wasn't talking about your bits and pieces. I was answering a direct question not necessarily related to your joyful shitting on that old man's freedom to say what's on his mind. Not only does he have the right to say that he doesn't think other people should challenge his favored politician, but he also has the right to wish, out loud, that they all be shot, or worse. That's the constitution in action. Same as your right to wish that any non-approved speech be somehow declared "unconstitutional."
Perhaps you could shove it up your arse for me.
Again, I never said he didn't have the right to counter-protest. I was pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming he fought for their rights followed by saying he would wipe them all out if he had a gun for exercising those rights.
These were my exact words,
Yes mate, you fought for their right to protest. Now you would shoot protesters if you had a gun. Are you sure you fought on the right side?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
StCapps
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Post
by StCapps » Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:16 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 9:49 am
Fife wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 9:37 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 9:22 am
I must have missed the bit where anyone (communist or not) was calling for him to be prosecuted, perhaps you could point it out for me.
I wasn't talking about your bits and pieces. I was answering a direct question not necessarily related to your joyful shitting on that old man's freedom to say what's on his mind. Not only does he have the right to say that he doesn't think other people should challenge his favored politician, but he also has the right to wish, out loud, that they all be shot, or worse. That's the constitution in action. Same as your right to wish that any non-approved speech be somehow declared "unconstitutional."
Perhaps you could shove it up your arse for me.
Again, I never said he didn't have the right to counter-protest. I was pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming he fought for their rights followed by saying he would wipe them all out if he had a gun for exercising those rights.
These were my exact words,
Yes mate, you fought for their right to protest. Now you would shoot protesters if you had a gun. Are you sure you fought on the right side?
He never claimed he would wipe them out for exercising their rights, he claimed he would wipe them out for being douche nozzles raining on veteran's day with their TDS. You are the one pretending he's mad because there is any protest at all, instead of not liking these particular protesters. Putting words in his mouth with your lame mind reading skills for the fail.
*yip*
-
DBTrek
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Post
by DBTrek » Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:26 am
The recent lynching of Don Cherry has Monte hella thirsty for more of that geriatric blood. Some people are absolutely lionized by watching the frail and elderly get taken down.
/shrug
-
StCapps
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Post
by StCapps » Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:39 am
DBTrek wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:26 am
The recent lynching of Don Cherry has Monte hella thirsty for more of that geriatric blood. Some people are absolutely lionized by watching the frail and elderly get taken down.
/shrug
Don Cherry would love this guy. That I can tell you.
*yip*
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:20 pm
DBTrek wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:26 am
The recent lynching of Don Cherry has Monte hella thirsty for more of that geriatric blood. Some people are absolutely lionized by watching the frail and elderly get taken down.
/shrug
Honestly, my only thought on Don Cherry is ''what the fuck is going on with those shirt collars''.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Smitty-48
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Post
by Smitty-48 » Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:27 pm
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:20 pm
DBTrek wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:26 am
The recent lynching of Don Cherry has Monte hella thirsty for more of that geriatric blood. Some people are absolutely lionized by watching the frail and elderly get taken down.
/shrug
Honestly, my only thought on Don Cherry is ''what the fuck is going on with those shirt collars''.
They're called True Collars.
They were invented in America in 1825 by Mrs. Hannah Lord Montague.
The reason was that most men could not afford a shirt for everyday of the week.
So she invented a separate collar, so they would always have a crisp clean one on show, even if the shirt wasn't.
The world ran on coal, coal dust was everywhere, so shirts got dirty fast.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:31 pm
Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:27 pm
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:20 pm
DBTrek wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 10:26 am
The recent lynching of Don Cherry has Monte hella thirsty for more of that geriatric blood. Some people are absolutely lionized by watching the frail and elderly get taken down.
/shrug
Honestly, my only thought on Don Cherry is ''what the fuck is going on with those shirt collars''.
They're called True Collars.
They were invented in America in 1825 by Mrs. Hannah Lord Montague.
The reason was that most men could not afford a shirt for everyday of the week.
So she invented a separate collar, so they would always have a crisp clean one on show, even if the shirt wasn't.
The world ran on coal, coal dust was everywhere, so shirts got dirty fast.
Why so high though? It looks like it is choking him.
I'm guessing that he's hiding a couple of swastika neck tatoos.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Smitty-48
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Post
by Smitty-48 » Wed Nov 13, 2019 3:00 pm
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:31 pm
Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:27 pm
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:20 pm
Honestly, my only thought on Don Cherry is ''what the fuck is going on with those shirt collars''.
They're called True Collars.
They were invented in America in 1825 by Mrs. Hannah Lord Montague.
The reason was that most men could not afford a shirt for everyday of the week.
So she invented a separate collar, so they would always have a crisp clean one on show, even if the shirt wasn't.
The world ran on coal, coal dust was everywhere, so shirts got dirty fast.
Why so high though? It looks like it is choking him.
I'm guessing that he's hiding a couple of swastika neck tatoos.
Back in the day, when Don was young, that was the high roller look, so he's keeping it gangster old school.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Wed Nov 13, 2019 3:14 pm
Looks like some kind of hipster peacock.
Good for him though, sticking to his fashion decision no matter how crazy it makes him look.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.