Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 3:11 pmUnless Tulsi dismantles Warren like she did to Harris, the nominee is going to be Warren, which means Trump wins reelection.
So sure you are...
Hard to compete with gibs...
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 3:11 pmUnless Tulsi dismantles Warren like she did to Harris, the nominee is going to be Warren, which means Trump wins reelection.
Trump is offering plenty of gibs. He stole their platform.Zlaxer wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 2:15 amSpeaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 3:11 pmUnless Tulsi dismantles Warren like she did to Harris, the nominee is going to be Warren, which means Trump wins reelection.
So sure you are...
Hard to compete with gibs...
The worst part is that she is a major in the US Army. Calling an officer a Russian agent should require strict evidence because of the potential impact on her unit. She also sits on the House Armed Services Committee; a seat which requires a security clearance entailing extreme vetting.Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 7:59 pmYeah, I was pretty shocked Clinton blew herself up like that, I mean, Russian Asset?StCapps wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 7:32 pmYeah Clinton fucked up real bad, she thought way more people actually care what she had to say than actually do, and forgot how many haters she had, which would create a Streisand effect.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 5:43 pmIt might not matter now. Tulsi could start throwing down sort of like Trump did in the various medias. Clinton talking shit about her was a disaster for the DNC.
What the fuck was she thinking?
I guess the Dems have just got so used to screaming about Russia, she overplayed that hand.
It's patently libelous, but moreover, it's sedition.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 6:13 amThe worst part is that she is a major in the US Army. Calling an officer a Russian agent should require strict evidence because of the potential impact on her unit. She also sits on the House Armed Services Committee; a seat which requires a security clearance entailing extreme vetting.
How do they fuck it up so bad though? Anti war peacenik when no one else wanted to do that and then they turn super hawk pro war when the appetite for such things has well been satiated. They wanted to keep Hussein in power but Assad has got to go?Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 12:05 pmIt's patently libelous, but moreover, it's sedition.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 6:13 amThe worst part is that she is a major in the US Army. Calling an officer a Russian agent should require strict evidence because of the potential impact on her unit. She also sits on the House Armed Services Committee; a seat which requires a security clearance entailing extreme vetting.
The Democrat Party hath become traitors to the republic once again.
Prison Industrial Complex Plantation Aristocracy.
Drug Warriors. Dirty Prosecutors. Bushwackers.
They have no principles, they stand for nothing, there are grounded in nothing, it's just the pursuit of the perks and prerogatives of office for that sake alone, they are like Trudeau and the Liberals here, the Liberals here are just the farm team for the Democrats, it's the same Aristocracy on both sides of the border.clubgop wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 3:33 pmHow do they fuck it up so bad though?Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 12:05 pmIt's patently libelous, but moreover, it's sedition.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 6:13 am
The worst part is that she is a major in the US Army. Calling an officer a Russian agent should require strict evidence because of the potential impact on her unit. She also sits on the House Armed Services Committee; a seat which requires a security clearance entailing extreme vetting.
The Democrat Party hath become traitors to the republic once again.
Prison Industrial Complex Plantation Aristocracy.
Drug Warriors. Dirty Prosecutors. Bushwackers.
Yeah I know all that. But one would think if you were all are about power, you would be better at the game. If you have no principles at least pretend to be for what is popular.Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 4:11 pmThey have no principles, they stand for nothing, there are grounded in nothing, it's just the pursuit of the perks and prerogatives of office for that sake alone, they are like Trudeau and the Liberals here, the Liberals here are just the farm team for the Democrats, it's the same Aristocracy on both sides of the border.