2nd Amendment Thread

User avatar
pineapplemike
Posts: 4650
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by pineapplemike » Mon Sep 16, 2019 7:45 am

Hastur wrote:
Mon Sep 16, 2019 7:36 am
Wasn't one of the recent shooters denied when he wanted to buy a weapon? He ended up buying one from a friend. When concerned neighbors contacted the police they sent out a patrol but they failed to find the address. I kid you not. The system almost worked that time.

I wonder how many shootings are prevented every year by people just doing what they are supposed to.
"when you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all"

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by Montegriffo » Mon Sep 16, 2019 7:46 am

The devil, as always, is in the detail. Blanket statements about possible misuse get you nowhere and the ''thin edge of the wedge'' argument destroys any chance of improving a situation through regulation.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Sep 16, 2019 7:55 am

You are using examples that already result in firearms being seized. We don't need "red flag laws" to take firearms away from somebody threatening to shoot up a school.

User avatar
Ex-California
Posts: 4116
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by Ex-California » Mon Sep 16, 2019 8:45 am

Red Flag Laws successfully manage to violate almost the whole Bill of Rights
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session

User avatar
doc_loliday
Posts: 2443
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:10 am

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by doc_loliday » Mon Sep 16, 2019 10:59 am

California wrote:
Mon Sep 16, 2019 8:45 am
Red Flag Laws successfully manage to violate almost the whole Bill of Rights

Bill of rights bingo, when you win you get a free tyranny.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Sep 19, 2019 5:23 am

For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

Ph64
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by Ph64 » Thu Sep 19, 2019 1:55 pm



Just remember that when seconds count the police are only minutes away.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by Speaker to Animals » Thu Sep 19, 2019 2:04 pm

Ph64 wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2019 1:55 pm


Just remember that when seconds count the police are only minutes away.
I suppose the dispatcher couldn't tell her to shoot him again.

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by TheReal_ND » Thu Sep 19, 2019 4:03 pm

Democrats advanced a new measure this week to encourage states to pass “red flag” laws. These so-called extreme risk protection orders authorize removing guns and ammunition from individuals deemed as dangerous by some anonymous, unaccountable person, but it would not include the ready-made lists of gang members.

Republicans tried to add an amendment including known gang members, but the Democrats will not permit the inclusion of gang databases. It’s odd since gangs are the ones causing most of the so-called gun violence.

They would agree to include the names of white supremacists, but not other terror groups.
https://www.independentsentinel.com/dem ... databases/

Just eat bugs and get shot by feral criminals lol

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by Fife » Thu Sep 19, 2019 4:11 pm

Your red flag is poking out.