Why are you conservative, why are you liberal, why are you independent?

[Zlaxer]

Huh. And yet you are a proponent of forced sterilization of poor people just so you can save some money in taxes. Guess the needs of many taxpayers is more important to the liberties of some people, eh, Margaret Sanger?

You’re less pro-liberty than TC is Conservative...

Cherry picking as usual - I said in exchange for the massive social services they receive. Save "some money" in taxes - 60% of my income goes to the fucking government. It's never enough for progressives - I'm not even going to waste more time explaining my position - not playing the collectivist game any more. You want more - you better be prepared to take it by force.

Not evil <-------------> Progressivism <--------------> Forced sterilization (fascism)

I only want to sterilize the poor in exchange for soical benefits bc the progressives keep increasing/cultivating the numbers of the poor and the benefits - it's a losing game for me - in the words of Hash - prove me wrong.

[Speaker to Animals]

Cherry picking as usual - I said in exchange for the massive social services they receive. Save "some money" in taxes - 60% of my income goes to the fucking government. It's never enough for progressives - I'm not even going to waste more time explaining my position - not playing the collectivist game any more. You want more - you better be prepared to take it by force.

Not evil <-------------> Progressivism <--------------> Forced sterilization (fascism)

I only want to sterilize the poor in exchange for soical benefits bc the progressives keep increasing/cultivating the numbers of the poor and the benefits - it's a losing game for me - in the words of Hash - prove me wrong.

Bearing in mind you live in a system where wealth (and poverty) is largely attributed according to luck..

[Zlaxer]

Not evil <-------------> Progressivism <--------------> Forced sterilization (fascism)

I only want to sterilize the poor in exchange for social benefits bc the progressives keep increasing/cultivating the numbers of the poor and the benefits - it's a losing game for me - in the words of Hash - prove me wrong.

Bearing in mind you live in a system where wealth (and poverty) is largely attributed according to luck..

Bearing in mind that progressives actively seek to increase the numbers of poor for political power.

And as previously stated - it's luck + intelligence. Do not confuse what we have now with capitalism.

[Zlaxer]

Someday StA - people will quit working....then wtf are the collectivists going to do?

I'm personally very close that that point....if I quit and claimed full benefits, I would get the equivalent in social benefits of what I keep post taxes....what is the point of work?

[TheReal_ND]

I

[Speaker to Animals]

Someday StA - people will quit working....then wtf are the collectivists going to do?

I'm personally very close that that point....if I quit and claimed full benefits, I would get the equivalent in social benefits of what I keep post taxes....what is the point of work?

Society is not going to quit working as long as the market is free. The bigger obstacle is barriers to entry to a free market like the ridiculous patent system you defended relentlessly.

You have better opportunities just going into small business or just farming than welfare. Welfare is a horrific existence and it is designed to entrap you.

[Zlaxer]

Someday StA - people will quit working....then wtf are the collectivists going to do?

I'm personally very close that that point....if I quit and claimed full benefits, I would get the equivalent in social benefits of what I keep post taxes....what is the point of work?

Society is not going to quit working as long as the market is free. The bigger obstacle is barriers to entry to a free market like the ridiculous patent system you defended relentlessly.

You have better opportunities just going into small business or just farming than welfare. Welfare is a horrific existence and it is designed to entrap you.

Lolz - so you're cool with people ripping an inventor off? What's your alternative....guessing your don't have one...so it's easy to bash the patent system....

[TheReal_ND]

That shit isn't real. If they want to rip off an inventor they will just do it.

[Speaker to Animals]

Someday StA - people will quit working....then wtf are the collectivists going to do?

I'm personally very close that that point....if I quit and claimed full benefits, I would get the equivalent in social benefits of what I keep post taxes....what is the point of work?

Society is not going to quit working as long as the market is free. The bigger obstacle is barriers to entry to a free market like the ridiculous patent system you defended relentlessly.

You have better opportunities just going into small business or just farming than welfare. Welfare is a horrific existence and it is designed to entrap you.

Lolz - so you're cool with people ripping an inventor off? What's your alternative....guessing your don't have one...so it's easy to bash the patent system....

I refer you to Monte's thread where he attempted to claim something is "stolen" when one transfers a parking pass to another that still has unused time on it.

Misusing the word to steal does not somehow make your position defensible. It's a cheap tactic to defend pure graft.

[Zlaxer]

Sooo....no solution then - :GOTEAMDRUNK: