important Celebrity Opinions Thread

[Speaker to Animals]

kourtney kardashian how many kids

Mitch McConnell is a great gunfighter.

[C-Mag]

Too Funny
#RacistDebraMessing

[TheReal_ND]

[Speaker to Animals]

The power of democracy must be fun for two people exempt from ever having to serve it.

[Speaker to Animals]

I just had a terrible thought. What if that Swedish teen lesbian and Hogg had a baby. Antichrist?

[clubgop]

A Jewish women lecturing others about the return of Jesus? What kind of fucked up shit is that?

[clubgop]

I just had a terrible thought. What if that Swedish teen lesbian and Hogg had a baby. Antichrist?

Or, The second coming of Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, and Charlton Heston. I mean raised by those two how else do you rebel?

[Speaker to Animals]

I just had a terrible thought. What if that Swedish teen lesbian and Hogg had a baby. Antichrist?

Or, The second coming of Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, and Charlton Heston. I mean raised by those two how else do you rebel?

Point taken.

[Montegriffo]

Mrs Thatcher arguably did more than any major UK politician at the time to legitimise the environment as a concern at the highest level.

During her brief green period in the late 1980s she shocked first the Royal Society then the UN with speeches crackling with environmental passion.

Her intervention consolidated the issue in the media and provoked many organisations into formulating policies on the environment.


The peak of her green interest was in the late 80s - a time of bubbling media coverage of acid rain, climate, waste and rainforest destruction. In 1989 she must have been alarmed when the Greens took 15% of the vote in the Euro elections.

In November 8, 1989 she told the UN: "While the conventional, political dangers - the threat of global annihilation, the fact of regional war - appear to be receding, we have all recently become aware of another insidious danger. It is the prospect of irretrievable damage to the atmosphere, to the oceans, to earth itself.

"What we are now doing to the world, by degrading the land surfaces, by polluting the waters and by adding greenhouse gases to the air at an unprecedented rate - all this is new in the experience of the earth. It is mankind and his activities that are changing the environment of our planet in damaging and dangerous ways."

She continued: "The result is that change in future is likely to be more fundamental and more widespread than anything we have known hitherto. It is comparable in its implications to the discovery of how to split the atom. Indeed, its results could be even more far-reaching.

"It is no good squabbling over who is responsible or who should pay. We shall only succeed in dealing with the problems through a vast international, co-operative effort.

We need more politicians like Thatcher.
She was a scientist though so she was probably lying, am I right?

[clubgop]

Mrs Thatcher arguably did more than any major UK politician at the time to legitimise the environment as a concern at the highest level.

During her brief green period in the late 1980s she shocked first the Royal Society then the UN with speeches crackling with environmental passion.

Her intervention consolidated the issue in the media and provoked many organisations into formulating policies on the environment.


The peak of her green interest was in the late 80s - a time of bubbling media coverage of acid rain, climate, waste and rainforest destruction. In 1989 she must have been alarmed when the Greens took 15% of the vote in the Euro elections.

In November 8, 1989 she told the UN: "While the conventional, political dangers - the threat of global annihilation, the fact of regional war - appear to be receding, we have all recently become aware of another insidious danger. It is the prospect of irretrievable damage to the atmosphere, to the oceans, to earth itself.

"What we are now doing to the world, by degrading the land surfaces, by polluting the waters and by adding greenhouse gases to the air at an unprecedented rate - all this is new in the experience of the earth. It is mankind and his activities that are changing the environment of our planet in damaging and dangerous ways."

She continued: "The result is that change in future is likely to be more fundamental and more widespread than anything we have known hitherto. It is comparable in its implications to the discovery of how to split the atom. Indeed, its results could be even more far-reaching.

"It is no good squabbling over who is responsible or who should pay. We shall only succeed in dealing with the problems through a vast international, co-operative effort.

We need more politicians like Thatcher.
She was a scientist though so she was probably lying, am I right?

She was right, 30 fucking years ago. First world countries have made significant strides since that time and we didn't have to ban shit or abandon free market principles to do it.