THE ERA OF TRUMP
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Being fired by Trump is better than retiring from his admin. At least if a person gets fired they can then signal their hatred of Trump, which removes them from the liberal blacklists. Sort of like putting a pro-Nazi sign in your shop window on the eve of Kristallnacht.
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
nah, being fired will fuck with his pride. ive been watching bolton for years, that dude thinks very highly of himself and his policies and career
but maybe im wrong idk, whatever. glad he's gone, but now who will replace him
but maybe im wrong idk, whatever. glad he's gone, but now who will replace him
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Because he was unhappy at the thought of negotiating with terrorists on the anniversary of the Battle of Sterling Bridge?pineapplemike wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 7:17 amyeah why would bolton want to resign? that dude is power hungry
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
you cant think of any other reason he would want to keep his highly powerful job influencing the president on foreign policy? he has other goals besides disrupting afghanistan peace talks
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
I thought you said you weren't defending Bolton.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 7:32 amBecause he was unhappy at the thought of negotiating with terrorists on the anniversary of the Battle of Sterling Bridge?pineapplemike wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 7:17 amyeah why would bolton want to resign? that dude is power hungry
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
I thought people around here had a sense of humour.PartyOf5 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 7:48 amI thought you said you weren't defending Bolton.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 7:32 amBecause he was unhappy at the thought of negotiating with terrorists on the anniversary of the Battle of Sterling Bridge?pineapplemike wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 7:17 amyeah why would bolton want to resign? that dude is power hungry
We can't both be right.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
How are you an undercover hack bitch?
A post by post example.
Great work by Flaggot. Has all the classics. Motte and bailey, goalpost moving, and adherence to narrative about WH turnover that isnt that bad historically. And who is even saying high turnover is a bad thing? Democrats cause they got nothing else. Russia didn't work, stormy and creepy porn lawyer was a dud, he racist, BORING, now the guy that has made a household name on shitcanning people on National television, shouldn't shitcan people on national television? Undercover hack bitch doing undercover hack bitch things.
A post by post example.
Great work by Flaggot. Has all the classics. Motte and bailey, goalpost moving, and adherence to narrative about WH turnover that isnt that bad historically. And who is even saying high turnover is a bad thing? Democrats cause they got nothing else. Russia didn't work, stormy and creepy porn lawyer was a dud, he racist, BORING, now the guy that has made a household name on shitcanning people on National television, shouldn't shitcan people on national television? Undercover hack bitch doing undercover hack bitch things.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
I think it was merely the final straw.pineapplemike wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 7:46 amyou cant think of any other reason he would want to keep his highly powerful job influencing the president on foreign policy? he has other goals besides disrupting afghanistan peace talks
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
hm maybe, i think the dude that became a household name firing people probably fired him
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
It's hard to know which of them lies the least.
On numbers alone probably Trump, on the size of the lies probably Bolton.
On numbers alone probably Trump, on the size of the lies probably Bolton.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.