Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:24 amhttps://thehill.com/homenews/media/3403 ... efing-room
From 2 years ago, there may be even more now...Conservative media outlets gain seats in White House briefing room
Conservative media outlets have more official seats in a new White House briefing room seating chart released Friday.
The updated seating chart sees conservative news organizations Newsmax and One America News (OAN), as well as British newspaper The Daily Mail, with designated seats. Newsmax and the Mail have their own spots, while OAN shares a seat.
None of the organizations had a spot under the previous seating chart, adopted in 2015.
The New York Post now shares a seat with the Christian Science Monitor, both organizations that previously held their own seats. The new chart also gives a seat to Westwood One radio, which it did not previously have.
In an email to the White House press corps announcing the seating changes, White House Correspondents’ Association (WHCA) president Jeff Mason said the WHCA board considered multiple factors in making changes to the previous seating chart.
“The board considered multiple criteria during this decision-making process, including regular briefing attendance and commitment to the White House beat – we did not want scarce real estate going unused,” Mason said.
“We also looked at news outlets’ audiences, both in terms of reach and in terms of preserving (or in some cases adding) diversity in the briefing room. We took stock of the changing landscape of our industry.”
The updated seating arrangement comes as members of the White House press corps continue to deal with a decreased number of on-camera press briefings from press secretary Sean Spicer and deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders. A number of reporters have criticized the White House press office for the lack of on-camera briefings.
Let's just leave it at this: your definition of "right wing" and mine do not align (at all). What you call "right wing", to me, are just a bunch of conservative sites, which is to say liberalism at the speed limit. In another ten years, those conservative sites will be defending gay marriage from whatever new sexual deviancy the far left promotes by then. Hell, Breitbart is already taking on that mantle.
Actual right wing sites are systematically driven off the Internet. They have their domains stolen. They get booted from the Internet DNS servers. Search engine sites don't index them or they don't put them in the search results. Of the ones that are up at any given time, you can't share them on social media.
Meanwhile all the corporate media is pretty far left and globalist.
You really have no case and your own list proves it. All of those sites you listed as "right wing" hold 1980s democrat positions.
