Meanwhile in America

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Meanwhile in America

Post by StCapps » Sun Sep 01, 2019 7:06 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 5:59 am
StCapps wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 5:51 am
Montegriffo will fight and die for right to eat pineapple on pizza, freedom of choice.

As for your constitution right to keep and bear arms not being infringed, Monte says fuck your freedom of choice.
:lol:
My right to pineapple pizza stops at the point where I slam it into your face.
Same applies to guns already, without the need for gun control for that to be the case. Same applies to pineapple, without the need for pineapple on pizza control for that to be the case.

The way you react to people calling to ban pineapple on pizza is the way law abiding gun owners react to people calling to ban guns. But you can only see why the former is retarded, but not the latter, why is that?

You fell right into TC's trap without even realizing what you were doing, and now you are experiencing cognitive dissonance because you are too attached to your position on gun control to rethink it, even when you are vociferously arguing against the exact logic you use to support gun grabbing policies by arguing against banning pineapple on pizza.

Wake up and smell the coffee Montegriffo, don't be ruled by cognitive dissonance, move past it and see the light.
*yip*

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Meanwhile in America

Post by Montegriffo » Sun Sep 01, 2019 7:26 am

StCapps wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 7:06 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 5:59 am
StCapps wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 5:51 am
Montegriffo will fight and die for right to eat pineapple on pizza, freedom of choice.

As for your constitution right to keep and bear arms not being infringed, Monte says fuck your freedom of choice.
:lol:
My right to pineapple pizza stops at the point where I slam it into your face.
Same applies to guns already, without the need for gun control for that to be the case. Same applies to pineapple, without the need for pineapple on pizza control for that to be the case.

The way you react to people calling to ban pineapple on pizza is the way law abiding gun owners react to people calling to ban guns. But you can only see why the former is retarded, but not the latter, why is that?

You fell right into TC's trap without even realizing what you were doing, and now you are experiencing cognitive dissonance because you are too attached to your position on gun control to rethink it, even when you are vociferously arguing against the exact logic you use to support gun grabbing policies by arguing against banning pineapple on pizza.
I can only assume this false equivalence between the harmful societal effects of unrestricted access to deadly firearms and the harmless practice of putting pineapple on pizzas is intended to divert from the fact that the pizza argument has been lost and the gun control argument is still open and not going well for the right to bear arms lobby.
When someone perpetrates a mass killing armed with a Hawaiian pizza you can get back to me.
Derp.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Meanwhile in America

Post by StCapps » Sun Sep 01, 2019 8:02 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 7:26 am
StCapps wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 7:06 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 5:59 am


My right to pineapple pizza stops at the point where I slam it into your face.
Same applies to guns already, without the need for gun control for that to be the case. Same applies to pineapple, without the need for pineapple on pizza control for that to be the case.

The way you react to people calling to ban pineapple on pizza is the way law abiding gun owners react to people calling to ban guns. But you can only see why the former is retarded, but not the latter, why is that?

You fell right into TC's trap without even realizing what you were doing, and now you are experiencing cognitive dissonance because you are too attached to your position on gun control to rethink it, even when you are vociferously arguing against the exact logic you use to support gun grabbing policies by arguing against banning pineapple on pizza.
I can only assume this false equivalence between the harmful societal effects of unrestricted access to deadly firearms and the harmless practice of putting pineapple on pizzas is intended to divert from the fact that the pizza argument has been lost and the gun control argument is still open and not going well for the right to bear arms lobby.
When someone perpetrates a mass killing armed with a Hawaiian pizza you can get back to me.
Derp.
The stats show that more people die of allergic reactions than guns, it's not a false equivalency. You over-estimate the death toll of guns and underestimate the harmlessness of pineapple. Both sides arguing for banning lost, the gun side isn't winning while the pineapple side is losing.
*yip*

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Meanwhile in America

Post by Montegriffo » Sun Sep 01, 2019 8:48 am

The risk of someone else eating a food you are allergic to resulting in your death is zero.
Unless you are allergic to Brasil nuts and they fuck you after eating them.
This is the only known example of an allergic reaction passing directly from one person to another.

If you are so allergic to pineapple that the consequences of a tiny bit of cross-contamination in the preparation could be fatal you should probably take responsibility for your own safety and avoid eating out at a pizza restaurant. This number is so small as to be not worth considering though.

Therefore your false equivalency is busted and the risk of unsuitable persons having easy access to firearms is infinitely more of a risk to you than other people liking pineapple on their pizza.

Tell you what, meet me in the shopping mall carrying food that some people may be allergic to and I'll bring a lethal weapon with a large magazine capacity. We'll see who is the most dangerous.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Meanwhile in America

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Sep 01, 2019 8:50 am

Pineapple pizza is a symbol of white supremacy.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Meanwhile in America

Post by Montegriffo » Sun Sep 01, 2019 8:56 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 8:50 am
Pineapple pizza is a symbol of white supremacy.
OK
Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Meanwhile in America

Post by StCapps » Sun Sep 01, 2019 8:56 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 8:48 am
The risk of someone else eating a food you are allergic to resulting in your death is zero.
Unless you are allergic to Brasil nuts and they fuck you after eating them.
This is the only known example of an allergic reaction passing directly from one person to another.

If you are so allergic to pineapple that the consequences of a tiny bit of cross-contamination in the preparation could be fatal you should probably take responsibility for your own safety and avoid eating out at a pizza restaurant. This number is so small as to be not worth considering though.

Therefore your false equivalency is busted and the risk of unsuitable persons having easy access to firearms is infinitely more of a risk to you than other people liking pineapple on their pizza.

Tell you what, meet me in the shopping mall carrying food that some people may be allergic to and I'll bring a lethal weapon with a large magazine capacity. We'll see who is the most dangerous.
You overrate the danger of guns, the danger doesn't justify your ineffective gun control policies and neither does the danger of pineapple's justify ineffective pineapple on pizza control policies. You might not be able to see the difference due to cognitive dissonance, but those not suffering from that problem sure can.
Last edited by StCapps on Sun Sep 01, 2019 8:58 am, edited 2 times in total.
*yip*

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Meanwhile in America

Post by The Conservative » Sun Sep 01, 2019 8:58 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 7:26 am
StCapps wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 7:06 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 5:59 am


My right to pineapple pizza stops at the point where I slam it into your face.
Same applies to guns already, without the need for gun control for that to be the case. Same applies to pineapple, without the need for pineapple on pizza control for that to be the case.

The way you react to people calling to ban pineapple on pizza is the way law abiding gun owners react to people calling to ban guns. But you can only see why the former is retarded, but not the latter, why is that?

You fell right into TC's trap without even realizing what you were doing, and now you are experiencing cognitive dissonance because you are too attached to your position on gun control to rethink it, even when you are vociferously arguing against the exact logic you use to support gun grabbing policies by arguing against banning pineapple on pizza.
I can only assume this false equivalence between the harmful societal effects of unrestricted access to deadly firearms and the harmless practice of putting pineapple on pizzas is intended to divert from the fact that the pizza argument has been lost and the gun control argument is still open and not going well for the right to bear arms lobby.
When someone perpetrates a mass killing armed with a Hawaiian pizza you can get back to me.
Derp.
You are missing the point, which is obvious. You are telling me I shouldn't be able to tell you what you should have on your pizza, then why should you tell me why I can't own a gun? Guns are not dangerous in the right hands, nor is your pinapple if you don't abuse it.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Meanwhile in America

Post by Montegriffo » Sun Sep 01, 2019 9:08 am

The Conservative wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 8:58 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 7:26 am
StCapps wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 7:06 am
Same applies to guns already, without the need for gun control for that to be the case. Same applies to pineapple, without the need for pineapple on pizza control for that to be the case.

The way you react to people calling to ban pineapple on pizza is the way law abiding gun owners react to people calling to ban guns. But you can only see why the former is retarded, but not the latter, why is that?

You fell right into TC's trap without even realizing what you were doing, and now you are experiencing cognitive dissonance because you are too attached to your position on gun control to rethink it, even when you are vociferously arguing against the exact logic you use to support gun grabbing policies by arguing against banning pineapple on pizza.
I can only assume this false equivalence between the harmful societal effects of unrestricted access to deadly firearms and the harmless practice of putting pineapple on pizzas is intended to divert from the fact that the pizza argument has been lost and the gun control argument is still open and not going well for the right to bear arms lobby.
When someone perpetrates a mass killing armed with a Hawaiian pizza you can get back to me.
Derp.
You are missing the point, which is obvious. You are telling me I shouldn't be able to tell you what you should have on your pizza, then why should you tell me why I can't own a gun? Guns are not dangerous in the right hands, nor is your pinapple if you don't abuse it.
I've already addressed the false equivalency issue.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Meanwhile in America

Post by The Conservative » Sun Sep 01, 2019 9:15 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 9:08 am
The Conservative wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 8:58 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 7:26 am


I can only assume this false equivalence between the harmful societal effects of unrestricted access to deadly firearms and the harmless practice of putting pineapple on pizzas is intended to divert from the fact that the pizza argument has been lost and the gun control argument is still open and not going well for the right to bear arms lobby.
When someone perpetrates a mass killing armed with a Hawaiian pizza you can get back to me.
Derp.
You are missing the point, which is obvious. You are telling me I shouldn't be able to tell you what you should have on your pizza, then why should you tell me why I can't own a gun? Guns are not dangerous in the right hands, nor is your pinapple if you don't abuse it.
I've already addressed the false equivalency issue.
No, you haven't.
#NotOneRedCent