South American Forest Fires - The lie within a lie.

[The Conservative]

It is not equivalent. Amazon biomass is off the charts compared to.any other forest.

It is now you moron. When the rest of the world's forests have been gutted it is going to be. Cripes, you really are dense.

[Speaker to Animals]

It is not equivalent. Amazon biomass is off the charts compared to.any other forest.

It is now you moron. When the rest of the world's forests have been gutted it is going to be. Cripes, you really are dense.

You have no idea what you are talking about, and you refuse to listen when people explain your error. Your argument was a bad one. You cannot compare acres of forest as if they are equivalent losses of biomass, and the Amazon has no equivalent (it is by far the most biomass of any biome).

[C-Mag]

The current fires in Brazil are the result of Swiddening Agriculture. It's one of the earliest forms of preparing ground for agriculture. It's practiced by primitive cultures throughout history. Once veg is burned off, the ground is basically ready for planting.

This is all political, it's actually a pretty good line of propaganda. You can push global warming, attack Trump and Bolsonaro all at once.

[Speaker to Animals]

It seems like another coordinated media campaign. It does not help to spread the typical normiecon horseshit like the OP did.

Focus on the narrative they are spinning and look for contradictions.

For one thing, this is how they do agriculture in Brazil. It sucks, but as long as they contain the fires on existing pastures and farmland, then the damage is not as bad as what is being described in the media. Second, is this really some new record in their burning practices?

I do not know the answers to those two questions, but I strongly suspect those answers do not support this latest propaganda blitz' narrative.

[The Conservative]

It is not equivalent. Amazon biomass is off the charts compared to.any other forest.

It is now you moron. When the rest of the world's forests have been gutted it is going to be. Cripes, you really are dense.

You have no idea what you are talking about, and you refuse to listen when people explain your error. Your argument was a bad one. You cannot compare acres of forest as if they are equivalent losses of biomass, and the Amazon has no equivalent (it is by far the most biomass of any biome).

The biomass there is utilized by the region. Do you even science?

[Speaker to Animals]

It is now you moron. When the rest of the world's forests have been gutted it is going to be. Cripes, you really are dense.

You have no idea what you are talking about, and you refuse to listen when people explain your error. Your argument was a bad one. You cannot compare acres of forest as if they are equivalent losses of biomass, and the Amazon has no equivalent (it is by far the most biomass of any biome).

The biomass there is utilized by the region. Do you even science?

Yes, TC. Unlike you, I actually have college degrees. Whether or not biomass is "utilized" is irrelevant to your fallacious reasoning in the OP.

[The Conservative]

You have no idea what you are talking about, and you refuse to listen when people explain your error. Your argument was a bad one. You cannot compare acres of forest as if they are equivalent losses of biomass, and the Amazon has no equivalent (it is by far the most biomass of any biome).

The biomass there is utilized by the region. Do you even science?

Yes, TC. Unlike you, I actually have college degrees. Whether or not biomass is "utilized" is irrelevant to your fallacious reasoning in the OP.

Congratulations, which one of us is making over six figures, has a good life and doesn't take everything so personally, you can't see straight.

There are two forms of Biomass, the tree aspect which you are getting such a hardon about, and then the part you don't see... the layers and layers, and layers of brush, etc that has been composting for centuries.

The two forests in Africa and Asia combined could dwarf the production of South America if they were not stripped like they were going out of style. Africa honestly has no excuse, nor does Asia, but what do I know... I'm an uneducated fool.

[Speaker to Animals]

Well, you don't know what you are talking about, but okay. Fuck off, TC. We managed to get rid of capps. One retard left.

Fucking dumbass. You can't compare a European forest with the Amazon rainforest like one acre of the former is equivalent to one acre of the latter.

[The Conservative]

Well, you don't know what you are talking about, but okay. Fuck off, TC. We managed to get rid of capps. One retard left.

Fucking dumbass. You can't compare a European forest with the Amazon rainforest like one acre of the former is equivalent to one acre of the latter.

You are fucking stuck on European and US forests... I said African and Asian. Learn how to read.

[Speaker to Animals]

Well, you don't know what you are talking about, but okay. Fuck off, TC. We managed to get rid of capps. One retard left.

Fucking dumbass. You can't compare a European forest with the Amazon rainforest like one acre of the former is equivalent to one acre of the latter.

You are fucking stuck on European and US forests... I said African and Asian. Learn how to read.

1. No forest is equivalent to the Amazon rainforest in biomass density.

2. You specifically compared acres of forest lost in Europe to acres of forest lost in the Amazon.