MHF Democrat Primary Poll

[The Conservative]

No. Clinton will not be running, Joe Biden got this.

They got rid of Epstine in prison... who said they can't sabotage the entire Democrat candidates out there to "force" Clinton to run against Trump? Crazier things have happened.

Oh please, take off the tin foil hat. Clinton isn't running again, she doesn't want to lose again. Last time she lose, she got so drunk she couldn't even give a concession speech the night of, like she wants to go through that again with absolutely no chance of winning.

Well the Democrats are trying to lose this time around without trying.

[StCapps]

They got rid of Epstine in prison... who said they can't sabotage the entire Democrat candidates out there to "force" Clinton to run against Trump? Crazier things have happened.

Oh please, take off the tin foil hat. Clinton isn't running again, she doesn't want to lose again. Last time she lose, she got so drunk she couldn't even give a concession speech the night of, like she wants to go through that again with absolutely no chance of winning.

Well the Democrats are trying to lose this time around without trying.

Not intentionally they aren't. They think they are winning, even though they are their own worst enemies.

[The Conservative]

Oh please, take off the tin foil hat. Clinton isn't running again, she doesn't want to lose again. Last time she lose, she got so drunk she couldn't even give a concession speech the night of, like she wants to go through that again with absolutely no chance of winning.

Well the Democrats are trying to lose this time around without trying.

Not intentionally they aren't. They think they are winning, even though they are their own worst enemies.

That's the point. Trump just has to let them eat their own. He sometimes says something to enrage them and they implode deeper into their own psychosis of "Tiger Blood Winning"... and when the "winner" comes out the other end of this Trump will just destroy them...

No matter who "wins" on the Democrat side, they are going to lose.

[Speaker to Animals]

They are not trying to lose as a whole. It's just the establishment that would rather lose than allow non-establishment candidates win. Same as what is happening in the republican party.

[Ph64]

Please clap.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/0 ... ren-video/

This field is the weakest. PLEASE CLAP indeed.

No!!! Sorry, point of personal privilege, please don't clap, it could trigger people who can't focus and is discriminatory against the hearing impaired. Use jazz hands instead.

[StCapps]

Please clap.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/0 ... ren-video/

This field is the weakest. PLEASE CLAP indeed.

No!!! Sorry, point of personal privilege, please don't clap, it could trigger people who can't focus and is discriminatory against the hearing impaired. Use jazz hands instead.

Point of personal privilege, Yo Comrades, I don't give a shit about your point of personal privilege, just get on with the meeting already.

[Fife]

Lookin good, Joe.

[Hastur]

More polling shenanigans

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/artic ... 41055.html

Tulsi Gabbard is on the verge of being excluded from the next Democratic presidential debate on the basis of criteria that appear increasingly absurd.

Take, for instance, her poll standing in New Hampshire, which currently places Gabbard at 3.3% support, according to the RealClearPolitics average as of Aug. 20. One might suspect that such a figure would merit inclusion in the upcoming debates -- especially considering she’s ahead of several candidates who have already been granted entry, including Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar, Beto O’Rourke, and Andrew Yang. But the Democratic National Committee has decreed that the polls constituting this average are not sufficiently “qualifying.”

[StCapps]

More polling shenanigans

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/artic ... 41055.html

Tulsi Gabbard is on the verge of being excluded from the next Democratic presidential debate on the basis of criteria that appear increasingly absurd.

Take, for instance, her poll standing in New Hampshire, which currently places Gabbard at 3.3% support, according to the RealClearPolitics average as of Aug. 20. One might suspect that such a figure would merit inclusion in the upcoming debates -- especially considering she’s ahead of several candidates who have already been granted entry, including Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar, Beto O’Rourke, and Andrew Yang. But the Democratic National Committee has decreed that the polls constituting this average are not sufficiently “qualifying.”

Aren't they going based on national support? Klobuchar qualifying is weird, the others qualifying was expected.

[Hastur]

The Democratic party is as democratic as the DDR now.