Net Neutrality

[Speaker to Animals]

It seems to me that you want to have your cake and eat it to; i.e. you want to argue against consumer protections but you don't want to support the outcomes of repealing those consumer protections.

Which is irrational.

Seems like you are projecting your own faults on others. You want to argue for consumer protections while ignoring the outcomes of allowing the FCC to regulate the internet, by tunnel visioning only on the positives of regulation and pretending the negatives do not exist.

Talk about irrational.

Ignore what? Was 2014 an era of horrific Soviet control of the Internet? I don't remember Internet gulags. We sure as shit have them now after deregulation, though.

If you are going to defend repealing consumer protections, then you need own the outcomes of those repeals. To claim you support deregulation but not the direct consequences of deregulation is the act of an irrational person.

[StCapps]

It seems to me that you want to have your cake and eat it to; i.e. you want to argue against consumer protections but you don't want to support the outcomes of repealing those consumer protections.

Which is irrational.

Seems like you are projecting your own faults on others. You want to argue for consumer protections while ignoring the outcomes of allowing the FCC to regulate the internet, by tunnel visioning only on the positives of regulation and pretending the negatives do not exist.

Talk about irrational.

Ignore what? Was 2014 an era of horrific Soviet control of the Internet? I don't remember Internet gulags. We sure as shit have them now after deregulation, though.

If you are going to defend repealing consumer protections, then you need own the outcomes of those repeals. To claim you support deregulation but not the direct consequences of deregulation is the act of an irrational person.

Don't let their foot in the door, the track record show when you do, it all goes to shit. Kicking them out before they could ruin it, that's the way to go.

[Speaker to Animals]

Seems like you are projecting your own faults on others. You want to argue for consumer protections while ignoring the outcomes of allowing the FCC to regulate the internet, by tunnel visioning only on the positives of regulation and pretending the negatives do not exist.

Talk about irrational.

Ignore what? Was 2014 an era of horrific Soviet control of the Internet? I don't remember Internet gulags. We sure as shit have them now after deregulation, though.

If you are going to defend repealing consumer protections, then you need own the outcomes of those repeals. To claim you support deregulation but not the direct consequences of deregulation is the act of an irrational person.

Don't let their foot in the door, the track record show when you do, it all goes to shit. Kicking them out before they could ruin it, that's the way to go.

So you have nothing. Noted.

[The Conservative]

It seems to me that you want to have your cake and eat it to; i.e. you want to argue against consumer protections but you don't want to support the outcomes of repealing those consumer protections.

Which is irrational.

Seems like you are projecting your own faults on others. You want to argue for consumer protections while ignoring the outcomes of allowing the FCC to regulate the internet, by tunnel visioning only on the positives of regulation and pretending the negatives do not exist.

Talk about irrational.

Ignore what? Was 2014 an era of horrific Soviet control of the Internet? I don't remember Internet gulags. We sure as shit have them now after deregulation, though.

If you are going to defend repealing consumer protections, then you need own the outcomes of those repeals. To claim you support deregulation but not the direct consequences of deregulation is the act of an irrational person.

And he keeps saying I need to have my meds up... he needs to be put on some. Oy.

[StCapps]

Ignore what? Was 2014 an era of horrific Soviet control of the Internet? I don't remember Internet gulags. We sure as shit have them now after deregulation, though.

If you are going to defend repealing consumer protections, then you need own the outcomes of those repeals. To claim you support deregulation but not the direct consequences of deregulation is the act of an irrational person.

Don't let their foot in the door, the track record show when you do, it all goes to shit. Kicking them out before they could ruin it, that's the way to go.

So you have nothing. Noted.

So you have nothing. Noted.

[The Conservative]

Ignore what? Was 2014 an era of horrific Soviet control of the Internet? I don't remember Internet gulags. We sure as shit have them now after deregulation, though.

If you are going to defend repealing consumer protections, then you need own the outcomes of those repeals. To claim you support deregulation but not the direct consequences of deregulation is the act of an irrational person.

Don't let their foot in the door, the track record show when you do, it all goes to shit. Kicking them out before they could ruin it, that's the way to go.

So you have nothing. Noted.

Nor do you, wtf...

[StCapps]

Don't let their foot in the door, the track record show when you do, it all goes to shit. Kicking them out before they could ruin it, that's the way to go.

So you have nothing. Noted.

Nor do you, wtf...

Zero Self Awareness is a helluva drug.

[Speaker to Animals]

Don't let their foot in the door, the track record show when you do, it all goes to shit. Kicking them out before they could ruin it, that's the way to go.

So you have nothing. Noted.

Nor do you, wtf...

Uh,.. no..

I have presented clear evidence that the major wireless carriers sold your real time location data, without your consent, to third parties who then sold it to criminals and scammers. This was the result of the repeal of the consumer privacy protections that barred such practices -- that both of you defended, by the way.

All you two can manage to do is try to bury your getting red-assed on the consequences of your deregulation position with insults and wrestling videos. LOL What a couple of dumbasses.

[The Conservative]

So you have nothing. Noted.

Nor do you, wtf...

Zero Self Awareness is a helluva drug.

An this is a guy who supposedly was picked up by the Air Force... Explains why he was a pit monkey instead of a fly boy.

[The Conservative]

So you have nothing. Noted.

Nor do you, wtf...

Uh,.. no..

I have presented clear evidence that the major wireless carriers sold your real time location data, without your consent, to third parties who then sold it to criminals and scammers. This was the result of the repeal of the consumer privacy protections that barred such practices -- that both of you defended, by the way.

All you two can manage to do is try to bury your getting red-assed on the consequences of your deregulation position with insults and wrestling videos. LOL What a couple of dumbasses.

Where, I am still waiting for proof... if Capps and I can't see it, then there is an issue, especially since Capps has called me out on things in the past, he'd tell me if I was in the wrong here.