pineapplemike wrote: Sat Aug 10, 2019 2:45 pm
@sta ill agree to the fears of deregulation if you admit to the fears of government regulation
The problem with his argument and he doesn't even see it, is that Google and the others sold their info, legally to entities requesting it. Once it reached the 3rd party, it was hacked. It has nothing to do with data being stolen from the ones that collected it originally.
He really is a moron when it comes to security issues. He needs to stick with threatening or insulting people and fixing airplanes, it seems what he's good at.
Last edited by The Conservative on Sat Aug 10, 2019 3:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
pineapplemike wrote: Sat Aug 10, 2019 2:45 pm
@sta ill agree to the fears of deregulation if you admit to the fears of government regulation
The idea that all regulations are good is as retarded as the idea no regulations are good. We are only dealing with retards of the latter variety here.
You know you are dealing with delusional ideologues when the slogans come out in full force.
2014 was not some era of Soviet Internet oppression.
pineapplemike wrote: Sat Aug 10, 2019 2:45 pm
@sta ill agree to the fears of deregulation if you admit to the fears of government regulation
The idea that all regulations are good is as retarded as the idea no regulations are good. We are only dealing with retards of the latter variety here.
You know you are dealing with delusional ideologues when the slogans come out in full force.
2014 was not some era of Soviet Internet oppression.
Wrong, some regulations are good, but most FCC regulations suck ass, and you refuse to admit that.
pineapplemike wrote: Sat Aug 10, 2019 2:45 pm
@sta ill agree to the fears of deregulation if you admit to the fears of government regulation
The idea that all regulations are good is as retarded as the idea no regulations are good. We are only dealing with retards of the latter variety here.
You know you are dealing with delusional ideologues when the slogans come out in full force.
2014 was not some era of Soviet Internet oppression.
Wrong, some regulations are good, but most FCC regulations suck ass, and you refuse to admit that.
I am saying the regulation that kept carriers from selling people's real time location data to criminals did not suck ass. You defend it.
The idea that all regulations are good is as retarded as the idea no regulations are good. We are only dealing with retards of the latter variety here.
You know you are dealing with delusional ideologues when the slogans come out in full force.
2014 was not some era of Soviet Internet oppression.
Wrong, some regulations are good, but most FCC regulations suck ass, and you refuse to admit that.
I am saying the regulation that kept carriers from selling people's real time location data to criminals did not suck ass. You defend it.
I did not defend it. I said one good regulation does not make up for thousands of shitty regulations and a general hatred of free speech, you seem to think it does. The bad heavily outweighs the good when it comes to FCC regulation, pointing to one good regulation does not change that equation.
You simply want to argue against an idiotic strawman because that is the only argument your bullshit holds up against, you don't actually address the argument I'm actually making, because your argument doesn't hold up in the face of that scrutiny.
StCapps wrote: Sun Aug 11, 2019 7:09 am
Wrong, some regulations are good, but most FCC regulations suck ass, and you refuse to admit that.
I am saying the regulation that kept carriers from selling people's real time location data to criminals did not suck ass. You defend it.
I did not defend it. I said one good regulation does not make up for thousands of shitty regulations and a general hatred of free speech, you seem to think it does. The bad heavily outweighs the good when it comes to FCC regulation, pointing to one good regulation does not change that equation.
You simply want to argue against an idiotic strawman because that is the only argument your bullshit holds up against, you don't actually address the argument I'm actually making, because your argument doesn't hold up in the face of that scrutiny.
Oh no. Fuck you.
You defended it. You defended the deregulation of consumer privacy protections both when it happened AND when I showed you the result.
I am saying the regulation that kept carriers from selling people's real time location data to criminals did not suck ass. You defend it.
I did not defend it. I said one good regulation does not make up for thousands of shitty regulations and a general hatred of free speech, you seem to think it does. The bad heavily outweighs the good when it comes to FCC regulation, pointing to one good regulation does not change that equation.
You simply want to argue against an idiotic strawman because that is the only argument your bullshit holds up against, you don't actually address the argument I'm actually making, because your argument doesn't hold up in the face of that scrutiny.
Oh no. Fuck you.
You defended it. You defended the deregulation of consumer privacy protections both when it happened AND when I showed you the result.
Nope. I told you that little good they do is heavily outweighed by the bad they do, I did not go after that specific regulation at any point in time, your reading comprehension is just terrible, and you want to argue against an imaginary boogeyman to make yourself seem smarter by comparison, captain strawman.
