Net Neutrality

[Speaker to Animals]

That's your argument?

I don't want predators tracking women down because this shekel cuck deregulated privacy and consumer protections. You supported this. You supported women being hunted down by cyberstalkers because AT&T wanted to cash in on the deregulation of consumer protections, and your response is "but you hate women!"

Go fuck yourself. You are not here to honestly discuss anything either.

This was the outcome of the deregulation you defend.

[The Conservative]

That's your argument?

I don't want predators tracking women down because this shekel cuck deregulated privacy and consumer protections. You supported this. You supported women being hunted down because AT&T cashed in on the deregulation of consumer protections, and your response is "but you hate women!"

Go fuck yourself. You are not here to honestly discuss anything either.

This was the outcome of the deregulation you defend.

Stick with your airplanes, you don't know shit about what you are trying to defend. If Comcast and other ISPs wanted Net Neutrality do you really think it does what you think it does?

[Speaker to Animals]

The FCC privacy rules from 2016 that were overturned by Congress sought to give consumers more choice about how their data was to be used, stored and shared. But consumers now have less “choice” than ever about how their mobile provider shares their data and with whom. Worse, the mobile and broadband providers themselves are failing to secure their own customers’ data.

This month, it emerged that the major mobile providers have been giving commercial third-parties the ability to instantly look up the precise location of any mobile subscriber in real time. KrebsOnSecurity broke the news that one of these third parties — LocationSmart — leaked this ability for years to anyone via a buggy component on its Web site.

We also learned that another California company — Securus Technologies — was selling real-time location lookups to a number of state and local law enforcement agencies, and that accounts for dozens of those law enforcement officers were obtained by hackers. Securus, it turned out, was ultimately getting its data from LocationSmart.

This week, researchers discovered that a bug in T-Mobile’s Web site let anyone access the personal account details of any customer with just their cell phone number, including full name, address, account number and some cases tax ID numbers.

Not to be outdone, Comcast was revealed to have exposed sensitive information on customers through a buggy component of its Web site that could be tricked into displaying the home address where the company’s wireless router is located, as well as the router’s Wi-Fi name and password.

It's not clear how FCC Chairman Pai intends to “reinstate a rational and effective system for protecting consumer privacy,” as he pledged after voting last year to overturn the 2015 privacy rules. The FCC reportedly has taken at least tentative steps to open an inquiry into the LocationSmart debacle, although Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) has called on Chairman Pai to recuse himself on the inquiry because Pai once represented Securus as an attorney. (Wyden also had some choice words for the wireless companies).

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2018/05/why ... r-private/


Capps and TC are perfectly okay with this, and if you disagree, then "you hate women" and wrestling videos until the inconvenient facts get buried.

[The Conservative]

The FCC privacy rules from 2016 that were overturned by Congress sought to give consumers more choice about how their data was to be used, stored and shared. But consumers now have less “choice” than ever about how their mobile provider shares their data and with whom. Worse, the mobile and broadband providers themselves are failing to secure their own customers’ data.

This month, it emerged that the major mobile providers have been giving commercial third-parties the ability to instantly look up the precise location of any mobile subscriber in real time. KrebsOnSecurity broke the news that one of these third parties — LocationSmart — leaked this ability for years to anyone via a buggy component on its Web site.

We also learned that another California company — Securus Technologies — was selling real-time location lookups to a number of state and local law enforcement agencies, and that accounts for dozens of those law enforcement officers were obtained by hackers. Securus, it turned out, was ultimately getting its data from LocationSmart.

This week, researchers discovered that a bug in T-Mobile’s Web site let anyone access the personal account details of any customer with just their cell phone number, including full name, address, account number and some cases tax ID numbers.

Not to be outdone, Comcast was revealed to have exposed sensitive information on customers through a buggy component of its Web site that could be tricked into displaying the home address where the company’s wireless router is located, as well as the router’s Wi-Fi name and password.

It's not clear how FCC Chairman Pai intends to “reinstate a rational and effective system for protecting consumer privacy,” as he pledged after voting last year to overturn the 2015 privacy rules. The FCC reportedly has taken at least tentative steps to open an inquiry into the LocationSmart debacle, although Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) has called on Chairman Pai to recuse himself on the inquiry because Pai once represented Securus as an attorney. (Wyden also had some choice words for the wireless companies).

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2018/05/why ... r-private/


Capps and TC are perfectly okay with this, and if you disagree, then "you hate women" and wrestling videos until the inconvenient facts get buried.

So someone is patting themselves on the back... oh yay...and you are now playing right into the Democrat's playbook. Cripes, you act like you know everything, but in this case you know shit.

https://www.wired.com/story/guide-net-neutrality/

https://www.realclearpolicy.com/article ... 11056.html

Anyone that has been using Pokemon Go, and programs of the sort have been doing this for years, so what is your real issue?

[Speaker to Animals]

This is how I know I won the "debate", if what you two did could be called that. We are discussing regulatory policy. I point out the horrific outcomes of your position. The discussion proceeds to "you hate women!!" and wrestling videos to bury the evidence.

You lost.

It is clear to all who read this that TC and Capps support that shit. They think it is okay for all the wireless carriers to sell real time location data to third parties without your consent, while those third parties make it trivial for criminals and predators to pay them and spoof your data to get your location.

You know they are okay with it because they don't change their minds, and proceed straight to the "but you hate women!!" defense. They don't even deny it.

"But you are a bigot" is the last-ditch appeal of every neoliberal ever. No argument to defend any of this shit they support. One might suspect, if *I* were the one who actually hated women, then *I* would be the one who supports selling their real time location data to rapists and stalkers. It certainly seems plausible that supporting this would represent a fair benchmark for who actually hates women, but okay..

[The Conservative]

This is how I know I won the "debate", if what you two did could be called that. We are discussing regulatory policy. I point out the horrific outcomes of your position. The discussion proceeds to "you hate women!!" and wrestling videos to bury the evidence.

You lost.

It is clear to all who read this that TC and Capps support that shit. They think it is okay for all the wireless carriers to sell real time location data to third parties without your consent, while those third parties make it trivial for criminals and predators to pay them and spoof your data to get your location.

You know they are okay with it because they don't change their minds, and proceed straight to the "but you hate women!!" defense. They don't even deny it.

"But you are a bigot" is the last-ditch appeal of every neoliberal ever. No argument to defend any of this shit they support. One might suspect, if *I* were the one who actually hated women, then *I* would be the one who supports selling their real time location data to rapists and stalkers. It certainly seems plausible that supporting this would represent a fair benchmark for who actually hates women, but okay..

Ok, Sybil. Keep on thinking that. You've yet to have a single thought of your own.

[Speaker to Animals]

Was it a good outcome? Yes or no.

[StCapps]

Was it a good outcome? Yes or no.

A broken clock being right twice a day is not a sign that it's doing a good job. We have pointed out the horrific outcomes of your position repeatedly, you didn't win that fight, you got murdered.

[Speaker to Animals]

Deregulation led to this. Was that a good outcome, yes of no?

[StCapps]

Deregulation led to this. Was that a good outcome, yes of no?

What is the outcome of FCC regulation in the vast majority of instances? Was it a good outcome, yes or no? The answer is hell fucking no.

Deregulation having some issues is not proof FCC regulation is the answer, not even close.