Fake News

[C-Mag]

P

[pineapplemike]

https://twitter.com/mattdizwhitlock/sta ... 05313?s=21
i looked into this a little and couldnt find more information but im sure it will get more popular throughout the day if its true

[Speaker to Animals]

https://twitter.com/mattdizwhitlock/sta ... 05313?s=21
i looked into this a little and couldnt find more information but im sure it will get more popular throughout the day if its true

Not sure if that's what happened, but I do know they have different headlines for different markets. If the market is more liberal-to-centrist, they will shift gears with more neutral headlines. If the market is more cultural Marxist, they will go balls to the wall with the hate and outrageous headlines. One might assume it's really about profit maximization, but I think it has more to do with propaganda effectiveness.

These corporations stopped acting exclusively according to a profit-motive at least a decade ago. They are controlled by intelligence community groups and corporations now.

[C-Mag]

I guess that's what happens with your minister of propaganda is taking a pizza break.

[pineapplemike]

nope, they changed it due to the twitter-sphere backlash

‘The headline was bad’: New York Times amends front page on Trump’s response to mass shootings after backlash
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2 ... -backlash/

A preview of Tuesday’s front page shared to social media sparked instant criticism from members of the public, journalists and politicians, including several 2020 Democratic presidential candidates, many of whom took issue with how the publication framed Trump’s comments on the weekend attacks in El Paso and Dayton, Ohio, that left at least 31 people dead and dozens injured. In the aftermath of the tragedies, major media outlets have faced scrutiny from all sides over how they confront Trump and his often inflammatory rhetoric.

About an hour after the headline went viral, the Times announced it had amended its wording.

“The headline was bad and has been changed for the second edition,” a spokesperson for the Times told The Washington Post in an email.

Later editions of the print paper feature the words, “ASSAILING HATE BUT NOT GUNS.” Subheads above the two stories about Trump’s speech were also changed.

maybe they should do a daily poll on twitter to approve their headlines before publication

flashback:



democrats obviously go the complete opposite direction with this

Democrats’ frustration with the news media boils over
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/ ... ia-1449406

A liberal backlash against the news media’s coverage of Donald Trump and the 2020 race was already brewing when the New York Times published a five-word headline Monday night summarizing the president’s reaction to the mass shootings over the weekend: “Trump Urges Unity Vs. Racism.”

“Unbelievable,” steamed Beto O’Rourke. “That’s not what happened,” wrote Kirsten Gillibrand. “Lives literally depend on you doing better,” Cory Booker tweeted.

“He’s been calling Mexican immigrants rapists and criminals,” O’Rourke responded. “Members of the press, what the fuck?”

Neera Tanden, the president of the left-leaning think tank Center for American Progress, told POLITICO that O’Rourke “spoke for millions of liberals” with those three words.

Still, the critique of the news media is cropping up more as the 2020 presidential campaign heats up, including during the primary debates hosted by CNN. And it has the potential to hurt the news business’ reputation with a large chunk of the electorate, just as Republican voters became less inclined to trust the mainstream media after years of candidates decrying what they viewed as liberal bias.

“A vast swath of Democratic voters are pretty angry at the media,” said Dan Pfeiffer, a former senior Obama adviser who is now a “Pod Save America” co-host. “They see a racist liar in the White House and a media too afraid to call him a racist or a liar.

these people are insane

[Hastur]

Actions have consequences. Now they can't fool everyone even once anymore.

INDICATORS OF NEWS MEDIA TRUST



TRUST IN NEWS ORGANIZATIONS

[The Conservative]

Actions have consequences. Now they can't fool everyone even once anymore.

INDICATORS OF NEWS MEDIA TRUST



TRUST IN NEWS ORGANIZATIONS

So in English, the Democrats are blind?

[Hastur]

Actions have consequences. Now they can't fool everyone even once anymore.

INDICATORS OF NEWS MEDIA TRUST



TRUST IN NEWS ORGANIZATIONS

So in English, the Democrats are blind?

Most likely willfully so.

[Haumana]

Actions have consequences. Now they can't fool everyone even once anymore.

INDICATORS OF NEWS MEDIA TRUST



TRUST IN NEWS ORGANIZATIONS

That bottom chart is the most telling, imo. All of those yellow bars really say that they trust those that they agree with. It is a little disheartening that the majority still think that Humpty Dumpty can be put back together, if only......

[The Conservative]

Actions have consequences. Now they can't fool everyone even once anymore.

INDICATORS OF NEWS MEDIA TRUST



TRUST IN NEWS ORGANIZATIONS

That bottom chart is the most telling, imo. All of those yellow bars really say that they trust those that they agree with. It is a little disheartening that the majority still think that Humpty Dumpty can be put back together, if only......

Oh, it can be put back together again, we just need some basil, some chives, a whisk, and a hot pan...