Proving you wrong is as frequent as the sun rising in the east.
All this violence?
Some of it sure but all of it is patent balderdash.
Gotcha fail yet again from the forum's ankle-biting Chihuahua.
That is your defense? No one is buying your bullshit.
I've proven you wrong multiple times in the past week. Your BS about the cost of investigations being the latest. That's not ankle biting, it's calling you out on your bullshit, and you're in it way up past your ankles.
You haven't proved shit and your ankle-biting gotcha just diverted away from the hypocrisy over bitching about the length and cost of the inquiry into Trump when investigations into Clinton took longer and cost more while getting zero prosecutions compared to the numerous charges and convictions which came from the Meuller inquiry.
You can lock both crooks up for all I care but don't be such a fucking hypocrite about it.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Montegriffo wrote: Mon Aug 05, 2019 11:34 am
You haven't proved shit and your ankle-biting gotcha just diverted away from the hypocrisy over bitching about the length and cost of the inquiry into Trump when investigations into Clinton took longer and cost more while getting zero prosecutions compared to the numerous charges and convictions which came from the Meuller inquiry.
You can lock both crooks up for all I care but don't be such a fucking hypocrite about it.
You mad bro?
So now (as usual) you move the goalposts from Benghazi to "investigations". You just confirmed that your original statement was a lie. You're suddenly so worried about diversion when you make a habit of diversion. Now that is some hypocritical stuff right there.
How many of those convictions were for Russian collusion? Zero. How many of those convictions were on Trump? Zero.
PartyOf5 wrote: Mon Aug 05, 2019 11:51 am
You mad bro?
Nice troll dipshit.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
pineapplemike wrote: Mon Aug 05, 2019 1:46 pm
the shooter used the word invaders or invasion several times in his festo, corporate press finally picking up on it
another thing i havent seen mentioned, i'm assuming the 2nd shooting was in response to the first, and that these are not two separate incidents. is anyone disputing that?
it should be evident to everyone in the media twitter sphere that both sides are escalating the attacks
pineapplemike wrote: Mon Aug 05, 2019 1:59 pm
another thing i havent seen mentioned, i'm assuming the 2nd shooting was in response to the first, and that these are not two separate incidents. is anyone disputing that?
it should be evident to everyone in the media twitter sphere that both sides are escalating the attacks
I am not convinced that the two are connected. Ohio dude killed his sister and shot her boyfriend but I haven't heard where in the timeline that happened. I read reports that she and he were 1st and other reports that she was out in public where most of the shooting occurred. Any updates?
