Desmond is AMAZING

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Hmmmmmmm
Good Context or Bad Context

You posted a picture with zero context whatsoever.

I'll add, though, that only people who are themselves prurient tend to see all nudity as sexually explicit. Like Victorians shielding us from the sin of table legs for being too phallic.

So, that pic could be good with you? What context would make that pic good to you? I want to hear this.


I don't know who you are describing, it's not me.

Are you just asking me to imagine whether an appropriate context is abstractly possible? The line between what is appropriate and what isn't can't rest on the power of my imagination.

But you can't very well accuse me of dishonesty out of one side of your mouth, and then post a picture with no context and demand I determine whether or not it is the appropriate context.

[C-Mag]

The Marxists were doing this shit in republican Spain right before they tried to genocide Catholics and the army turned on them.

Trying to compare it to art of masters like Michaelangelo is dishonest, a subversive way to pervert children.

Can you explain what makes Michelangelo a master? Do tell, because expert critics have been trying to understand what separates masterworks from garbage for a long-ass time.

Experts around here claim to have the answer... I think they are probably just full of it, and are just the same sort of prigs that painted blankets over the genitals the Master painted on the Sistine Chapel.

+1 nice question, but that's a trap.
Artists and art historians can't even answer that question. However your question distraction from the point, and you know it.


So, what could possibly be the good context of a full grown man, pulling a young girl in close to his naked body so that she's inches away from his genitals ?

[C-Mag]

Are you just asking me to imagine whether an appropriate context is abstractly possible? The line between what is appropriate and what isn't can't rest on the power of my imagination.

But you can't very well accuse me of dishonesty out of one side of your mouth, and then post a picture with no context and demand I determine whether or not it is the appropriate context.

You stated it's a matter of context...………. I don't see it that way, I'm want to know what I'm missing. What possible context of that pic would make it OK ?

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Trying to compare it to art of masters like Michaelangelo is dishonest, a subversive way to pervert children.

Can you explain what makes Michelangelo a master? Do tell, because expert critics have been trying to understand what separates masterworks from garbage for a long-ass time.

Experts around here claim to have the answer... I think they are probably just full of it, and are just the same sort of prigs that painted blankets over the genitals the Master painted on the Sistine Chapel.

+1 nice question, but that's a trap.
Artists and art historians can't even answer that question. However your question distraction from the point, and you know it.


So, what could possibly be the good context of a full grown man, pulling a young girl in close to his naked body so that she's inches away from his genitals ?

Don't know. I don't have much of an imagination. But there are many contexts that aren't sexual. It isn't clear that they are strangers, or that the man pulled her close instead of her coming to give a platonic hug to her weird naked friend.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Are you just asking me to imagine whether an appropriate context is abstractly possible? The line between what is appropriate and what isn't can't rest on the power of my imagination.

But you can't very well accuse me of dishonesty out of one side of your mouth, and then post a picture with no context and demand I determine whether or not it is the appropriate context.

You stated it's a matter of context...………. I don't see it that way, I'm want to know what I'm missing. What possible context of that pic would make it OK ?

I stated that context matters. Like, seeing a nude man in a museum or medical textbook, versus seeing one in a playground, or seeing a titty in a porno versus one in an illuminated text about the Virgin Mary. Then you posted a weird picture that didn't have any context, and demanded I try to imagine a context that might make it appropriate.

It certainly isn't an argument that context isn't important. Perhaps you found a picture that is totally inappropriate. How does that change the fact that context matters?

[Hastur]

How in the world we can have a world where Harvey Weinstein is charged for exposing himself to a grown ass woman and we allow this in schools in fucking insane.

Point awarded.

Anyone who's been in a Scandinavian unisex sauna knows that there's a difference between nudity and sexuality. You Americans need some schooling.

[Speaker to Animals]

The Marxists were doing this shit in republican Spain right before they tried to genocide Catholics and the army turned on them.

Trying to compare it to art of masters like Michaelangelo is dishonest, a subversive way to pervert children.

Can you explain what makes Michelangelo a master? Do tell, because expert critics have been trying to understand what separates masterworks from garbage for a long-ass time.

Experts around here claim to have the answer... I think they are probably just full of it, and are just the same sort of prigs that painted blankets over the genitals the Master painted on the Sistine Chapel.

Indeed. What really is truth, anyway?

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Trying to compare it to art of masters like Michaelangelo is dishonest, a subversive way to pervert children.

Can you explain what makes Michelangelo a master? Do tell, because expert critics have been trying to understand what separates masterworks from garbage for a long-ass time.

Experts around here claim to have the answer... I think they are probably just full of it, and are just the same sort of prigs that painted blankets over the genitals the Master painted on the Sistine Chapel.

Indeed. What really is truth, anyway?

Aren't there some nude statues somewhere for you to drape cloth over, you joyless Victorian scold?

[Speaker to Animals]

Sex offenders exposing their disgusting bodies to children just need to be thrown in jail.

What that revolting woman did was a crime, and she only got away with it because of the left's ugly vagina exemption. If some disgusting old man exposes himself to children he is convicted as a child predator and choked to death in prison.

What makes it most revolting is that the average boy is most likely to be raped or sexually assaulted by a liberal woman, and most likely in the government school prison.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]