Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2019 3:51 am
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2019 3:32 am
Capps is a dug addicted moron. It's easy to cut a confused pothead down at the knees, but that has fuck all to do with what Fife and I have said here.
We need the answer to Bjorn's question.
If this is parents withholding payment because they don't like the school giving free lunches to the poorer students it's a very different story from schools charging too much and parents not making alternative arrangements to feed their kids.
The government schools are nothing but a graft/jobs program for democratic party voter blocs (public employees). They steal money from tax payers and then fail to deliver even a modest return on the public expenditures.
Meanwhile, patents cannot afford to send their children to a real school because the government racket is plundering their income to the tune of many thousands of dollars per month. Nobody consents to that.
Then when parents cannot afford to pay even more money for the shit food, or refuse to pay those bandits one more dime, those government banditos threaten to steal children too if they do not get paid.
And you defend that.
Furthermore, I think you lost out on an important aspect of freeloading: consent. A freeloader choses to do this. A guy who hides money in his sock and chooses not to inform his armed robber that there is more money to be robbed is not a freeloader. He did not choose to be a robbery victim. He just refused to make the robbery easy.