THE ERA OF TRUMP

[BjornP]

I disagree, and you didn't address my second point.


'Second, let's keep in mind this is all based and promoted on the back of Athropogenic Global Warming. A flawed and unproven theory. '

It doesn't need to be addressed. It's like trying to argue with a rabid anti-weapon fanatic that a hand grenade isn't a weapon of mass destruction or getting them to define "assault rifle" beyond "it sounds scary". Or that the Earth isn't actually flat. Do I trust scientists or do I trust the coal and oil lobby that's been paying good money to big media talking heads to melt your brains with moronic propaganda about world conspiracies fuelled by environmentalism?

[C-Mag]

Yeah, lots of scientists funded by oil companies say the same.
I'm gonna stick with the 97% though.

It is only a theory at best until it is proveable and repeatable by Scientific Method.

Why do you Hate Science ?

Why do you hate scientific theories?
What have you got against time or gravity?
Are they real or are they just theories?

Try emptying a bucket of water over your head and see how long it takes to dry out.
Theoretically of course.

I love Scientific Theories. I'm just intelligent enough to deal with them as theories instead of intimating it's proven Scientific Law.


Why do you Hate Science ?

[C-Mag]

I disagree, and you didn't address my second point.


'Second, let's keep in mind this is all based and promoted on the back of Athropogenic Global Warming. A flawed and unproven theory. '

It doesn't need to be addressed. It's like trying to argue with a rabid anti-weapon fanatic that a hand grenade isn't a weapon of mass destruction or getting them to define "assault rifle" beyond "it sounds scary". Or that the Earth isn't actually flat. Do I trust scientists or do I trust the coal and oil lobby that's been paying good money to big media talking heads to melt your brains with moronic propaganda about world conspiracies fuelled by environmentalism?

Another Science Hater
We don't need to prove Climate Change, but we need to change all our lives for it.

[Montegriffo]

I love Scientific Theories.

You keep using those words...

[C-Mag]

I love Scientific Theories.

You keep using those words...

You AGW folks know that sticking the Scientific Principles is a loser for you because the theory, is just a theory and not proven at any level that would logically force all the world governments to act on it.
AND...………...
I'm being very generous calling it anything more than a hypothesis

[Montegriffo]

You do understand that scientific theories are not like your conspiracy theories don't you?
You have to show your workings and everything. You don't just get to make up a theory based on your current state of paranoia about the establishment.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

They should really be called "conspiracy hypothesis."

[Fife]

Good!

[Montegriffo]

[C-Mag]

You do understand that scientific theories are not like your conspiracy theories don't you?
You have to show your workings and everything. You don't just get to make up a theory based on your current state of paranoia about the establishment.

I have a very good understanding of the Scientific Method, that is why I'm skeptical of AGW. That is why I also said I'm being generous calling AGW a theory, when it's likely just a hypothesis.


Where do you put AGW on the above flow chart ?