THE ERA OF TRUMP

[Montegriffo]

Get better criticisms of Trump, shitty criticisms is a sign of TDS, if you had better material you wouldn't need to reach and out yourself as suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome.

As I said, you trot out TDS when you don't want to address criticism of Trump.
Tedious avoidance tactic with as much value as shouting FAKE NEWS when confronted with an uncomfortable truth.

[StCapps]

If he was well informed, he wouldn't repeating bullshit talking points as his take on the administration.

By ''bullshit talking points'' I assume you mean ''we all know Trump is inept and incompetent and that his administration is chaotic and dysfunctional but we don't like anyone pointing it out''.

Yup, bullshit media narrative, totally untrue.

[StCapps]

Get better criticisms of Trump, shitty criticisms is a sign of TDS, if you had better material you wouldn't need to reach and out yourself as suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome.

As I said, you trot out TDS when you don't want to address criticism of Trump.
Tedious avoidance tactic with as much value as shouting FAKE NEWS when confronted with an uncomfortable truth.

I can address it, if you point out what you find to be "chaotic, dysfunctional, inept, incompetent, blah blah blah". If all you got is media talking points and zero examples, there is nothing to address. Acting like these are criticisms worth addressing, just because some British Ambassador thinks that is so, is an asinine appeal to authority.

If you have a point, make the point, don't hide behind talking points with nothing to back them up, and act like this requires a super in depth rebuttal, because it doesn't. If I don't address it, it's not because I don't want address criticism of Trump, I do that all the time, I don't address something when there is nothing to address because it's a shitty criticism with nothing to back it up. Hell I even address shitty criticisms all the time, as long as it's a specific criticism, as opposed to a general talking point with no actual examples to say why you think that is the case.

Obvious concern troll is obvious, you just put way too much stock into shitty criticisms that you think are bang on, and therefore think these are such great criticisms that need to be addressed, even when they are nothing of the sort.

[Speaker to Animals]

Your government has been caught lying and attempting to undermine American democracy several times over the past few years. British intelligence is responsible for that fake intelligence report (i.e. PissGate) that was used by our deep state to illegally spy upon an opposition election campaign in order to thwart the will of the American people.

It's been nonstop lying and manipulation from these people. Why should we consider a damned thing any member of your deceitful government has to say after all this shit?

And say what you will about the Trump administration; at least he doesn't allow Muslim rape gangs to flourish in every American city only to imprison Americans (with those very same jihadis) who complain, in some cases being murdered therein. Speaking of ineptitude and pure evil..

I am just not feeling the concern trolling from a totalitarian police state like the UK. Thanks, but no thanks. I think they should redirect their concern for the actual English people who are being genocided, raped, and murdered by an unchecked wave of Africans and Muslims.

[Fife]

I'm trying to sort out who the people are who actually GAF about what the UK thinks of anything.

Failing to acknowledge limey musings about the world doesn't make someone a Trumpist.

[PartyOf5]

Get better criticisms of Trump, shitty criticisms is a sign of TDS, if you had better material you wouldn't need to reach and out yourself as suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome.

As I said, you trot out TDS when you don't want to address criticism of Trump.
Tedious avoidance tactic with as much value as shouting FAKE NEWS when confronted with an uncomfortable truth.

Do you have any specific criticisms? All I see from you are political cartoons and gossip. Who cares if an ambassador thinks the administration is chaotic? I focus on results, like low unemployment, appointing judges, not starting wars.

[PartyOf5]

If you have a point, make the point, don't hide behind talking points with nothing to back them up, and act like this requires a super in depth rebuttal, because it doesn't.

His only point is that he doesn't like Trump.

[StCapps]

If you have a point, make the point, don't hide behind talking points with nothing to back them up, and act like this requires a super in depth rebuttal, because it doesn't.

His only point is that he doesn't like Trump.

BBC Propaganda is a helluva drug.

[pineapplemike]

Get better criticisms of Trump, shitty criticisms is a sign of TDS, if you had better material you wouldn't need to reach and out yourself as suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome.

As I said, you trot out TDS when you don't want to address criticism of Trump.
Tedious avoidance tactic with as much value as shouting FAKE NEWS when confronted with an uncomfortable truth.

Do you have any specific criticisms? All I see from you are political cartoons and gossip. Who cares if an ambassador thinks the administration is chaotic? I focus on results, like low unemployment, appointing judges, not starting wars.

the insane turnover rate in the first two years of the administration signals some form of chaos, to me atleast

[StCapps]

As I said, you trot out TDS when you don't want to address criticism of Trump.
Tedious avoidance tactic with as much value as shouting FAKE NEWS when confronted with an uncomfortable truth.

Do you have any specific criticisms? All I see from you are political cartoons and gossip. Who cares if an ambassador thinks the administration is chaotic? I focus on results, like low unemployment, appointing judges, not starting wars.

the insane turnover rate in the first two years of the administration signals some form of chaos, to me atleast

The turnover rate ain't that remarkable, it's been totally overblown.

Trump does prefer a higher turnover rate than average, but because he hires people to do a specific job, once they do it and he needs another job done, he hires the best person for that job, hence his multiple campaign managers for example, he hired three different people for different stages in his presidential run. Lewandowski was best for grabbing attention early in the primaries, Manafort was best for convention management after the primaries were in the bag, and Conway was best for the Presidential Election. None of the three would have done as good of a job as the other two during the phase where they were campaign manager, and worked best at a specific job.

It's a strategy, not a sign of chaos, when circumstances change, bring in someone with talents better adapted to those circumstances, instead of hiring one person and holding on to them, when they can only be so good at so many things and he needs other things from someone in that position, that's how Trump rolls.

Trump is like Belichick in that way, if a good player doesn't fit the role anymore, or wants too much money, bring in a replacement who better fills the role he needs at a cheaper cap hit.