2020 election

[StCapps]

Meh.
Weak Ass prediction of someone the Dems and their media lapdogs are submarining.

They don't need to submarine her, she's so dull and boring, she'll submarine herself.

There's no balls in making these types of predictions. I could make them about any of over 20 Dem candidates right now. It's like saying Fiorini gal didn't have a chance in '16 for the GOP.

Exactly. Yet some people on this forum still like to pretend she actually has a chance. Don't act like they aren't.

It's a Captain Obvious prediction, sure, but some are still in denial, and I like to make fun of their stupidity.

[Speaker to Animals]

You can like that schtick all you want, but she can't sell it, so it's irrelevant. Get a better messenger, Tulsi Gabbard ain't gonna cut it.

Meh.
Weak Ass prediction of someone the Dems and their media lapdogs are submarining.

Seriously. He was doing the exact same thing in 2016. Probably will be back again in 2024 with the same song and dance.

[StCapps]

Seriously. He was doing the exact same thing in 2016. Probably will be back again in 2024 with the same song and dance.

I under-estimated Trump in 2016, but wised up quickly, even bet on him and put my money where my mouth was.

Now you over-estimate anyone who isn't super pro-globalist because of Trump's success, thinking it's super easy to replicate because everyone hate the establishment as much as you do. Your views are not the views of the general electorate, you are the broken clock, who was right in 2016, but you won't be able to predict shit after, because your filter sucks.

[Speaker to Animals]

Seriously. He was doing the exact same thing in 2016. Probably will be back again in 2024 with the same song and dance.

I under-estimated Trump in 2016, but wised up quickly. Now you over-estimate anyone who isn't super pro-globalist because of Trump's success.

I have not over-estimated anybody. I said the nomination is wide-open, and the establishment candidates are unlikely to win. You are attempting to project your foolishness onto everybody else instead of engaging in self-reflection.

[pineapplemike]

mike gravel is legit, i forget about him, maybe i misread the earlier post but don't lump him in with those other lefty goons

[StCapps]

Did you bet on Trump to be elected POTUS in 2016? I did. I put my money where my mouth was.

How much did you win betting on Trump? I won $240.

[StCapps]

You are attempting to project your foolishness onto everybody else instead of engaging in self-reflection.

That's basically every single one of your posts. You wouldn't know what self-reflection was if it slapped you in the face, captain projection.

[C-Mag]

They don't need to submarine her, she's so dull and boring, she'll submarine herself.

There's no balls in making these types of predictions. I could make them about any of over 20 Dem candidates right now. It's like saying Fiorini gal didn't have a chance in '16 for the GOP.

Exactly. Yet some people on this forum still like to pretend she actually has a chance. Don't act like they aren't.

It's a Captain Obvious prediction, sure, but some are still in denial, and I like to make fun of their stupidity.

I disagree.
Some folks just like aspects of candidates that are different than the status quo, and like promoting those ideas. I don't think there's a lot of disillusion as to the actual changes of candidates like Tulsi. See Ron Paul, still has a huge following.

Trump was different for a number of reasons, a few of us saw that.

[Speaker to Animals]

You are attempting to project your foolishness onto everybody else instead of engaging in self-reflection.

That's basically every single one of your posts. You wouldn't know what self-reflection was if it slapped you in the face, captain projection.

Are you still yapping?

The front-runner this early in a primary election means nothing, child. It does not matter now, and never did matter before.

And stop lying about what people post. I am so tired of that tactic.

[StCapps]

Trump was different for a number of reasons, a few of us saw that.

and even fewer of us saw it, and had the balls to put money on it.

<flexes>

You can disagree all you want C-Mag, but Speaker to Faggots thinks Tulsi is more likely to win than Biden, he's seriously that delusional.