Civil War Doomsday Clock

[Zlaxer]

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2019 ... ll-pa/?234


Power to the Masses!!!

Take that Florida, Ohio, any states other than Costal population centers....


This is a good thing - flyover state voters are too racist to have a say in POTUS.

[TheReal_ND]

I'm not clicking that link.

[nmoore63]

But he was trying to get mixed up in that.

Was he? You have proof of that, or is this just "he wouldn't have been there unless for nefarious reasons" speculation? I don't put much stock in anyone's mind reading abilities, even yours Nick, so IF that's all you got, I'd cut the guy more slack than that, if I were you.

If you got proof he was looking for trouble, that's one thing, assuming he was looking for trouble, simply because trouble found him, that's reaching.

still no need to lie about him killing someone with his car

[nmoore63]

Also, he was more than likely trying to leave after the police started letting antifa run riot. Him not being from the city he was probably using Google maps. Google maps isn't going to tell you how to navigate through a city with spontaneous police and antifa road blocks. Use your fucking head for a change and imagine for a second the amount of duress the guy was in while his car was being attacked, after the rally got btfo'd by police and antifa that was originally sanctioned by the city.

Whole thing was a trap anyway. Honey pot.

And let's not forget the context either. Around that time people were under the impression you could legally plow through BLM blocking an intersection and claim it was self defense. And it should be argued that in some cases it could be. But this was after video of BLM getting trucked in the middle of a highway became popular.

Selective enforcement. Whole thing was a pysop designed to end someone's life and forever give mouth breathing retards another Boogeyman to entertain themesleves with

Possible.
I said he was guilty of less than he got

Still no need to lie about killing someone with his car.

[PartyOf5]

Over the course of the last week or so there has been a lot of talk (I won't call it discussion because most of it is just people yelling their opinions and then closing their ears) around abortion. One thing I hear (and read) quite a bit from anti-lifers (yeah, that's what I'm going to call them) is that a woman should be allowed to make her our choice. That we should trust every single woman to do what is right and not prevent her from making any choice about it.

Well, these same people are the ones screaming about how alt-right, far-right, basically anyone that isn't a far left as them need to be censored. They claim people being exposed to this speech cannot be trusted to make up their own minds about whether of not that speech is good or bad, true or false. So on one hand we need to trust every woman to make the "right" choice on abortion, but they can't be trusted to listen to certain speech without being corrupted.

More liberal/progressive/whatever you want to call it, just make sure it includes the word hypocrisy.

[Speaker to Animals]

Over the course of the last week or so there has been a lot of talk (I won't call it discussion because most of it is just people yelling their opinions and then closing their ears) around abortion. One thing I hear (and read) quite a bit from anti-lifers (yeah, that's what I'm going to call them) is that a woman should be allowed to make her our choice. That we should trust every single woman to do what is right and not prevent her from making any choice about it.

Well, these same people are the ones screaming about how alt-right, far-right, basically anyone that isn't a far left as them need to be censored. They claim people being exposed to this speech cannot be trusted to make up their own minds about whether of not that speech is good or bad, true or false. So on one hand we need to trust every woman to make the "right" choice on abortion, but they can't be trusted to listen to certain speech without being corrupted.

More liberal/progressive/whatever you want to call it, just make sure it includes the word hypocrisy.

They are the same people that defend enslaving fathers. Apparently a father's body belongs to the woman too.

[Speaker to Animals]

Boom

His car is being attacked. When your car is attacked by a crowd with weapons who are surrounding you car, do you just sit there and not try to drive away? People acting like this is black and white, seems kind rather virtue signally to me.

do Not purposefully drive around in a riot.

Doesn't matter.

He had a right to drive there. It is illegal to literally assault people with rifles and bats. The mayhem that ensues from your victim frantically trying to flee from your attack is on YOU, not the victim.

And as you skillfully ignored, your "proof" blog post was bullshit. The woman shown in that photo was not Heather Heyer. She was yet another Antifa radical attacking the vehicle that Fields struck while fleeing his attackers.

Again: whether or not you hate somebody has no bearing on their guilt.

Gentlemen of the jury, as you are under oath to determine this cause by law and evidence; clubs they had not, and they could not defend themselves with their bayonets against so many people; it was in the power of the sailors to kill one half or the whole of the party, if they had been so disposed; what had the soldiers to expect, when twelve persons armed with clubs, (sailors too, between whom and soldiers, there is such an antipathy, that they fight as naturally when they meet, as the elephant and Rhinoceros) were daring enough, even at the time when they were loading their guns, to come up with their clubs, and smite on their guns; what had eight soldiers to expect from such a set of people? Would it have been a prudent resolution in them, or in any body in their situation, to have stood still, to see if the sailors would knock their brains out, or not? Had they not all the reason in the world to think, that as they had done so much, they would proceed farther?

http://www.bostonmassacre.net/trial/acct-adams1.htm

Something ^^^ to ponder while you pat yourself on the back for supporting the imprisonment of the "wrong" sort.

[nmoore63]

The dude hit her with a car. Stop lying.

[Hastur]

I thought that in US law if you partake in a crime that leads to someone being killed you are guilty of murder. I've seen cases where getaway drivers who are sitting outside of where a robbery is being committed have been sentenced when their buddy is killed in the attempt. I think it's called felony murder. Does it differ between states?

[nmoore63]

I thought that in US law if you partake in a crime that leads to someone being killed you are guilty of murder. I've seen cases where getaway drivers who are sitting outside of where a robbery is being committed have been sentenced when their buddy is killed in the attempt. I think it's called felony murder. Does it differ between states?

Yes it’s a thing.

Yes it differs between states.

The point they are trying to make is related to his car being attacked and so plowing into a crowd was self defense.