Hahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!
Game of Thrones - mostly
-
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm
Re: Game of Thrones - mostly
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND
-
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Re: Game of Thrones - mostly
Ah, HD does occasionally tell his honest opinion about things. And it's all tales of deep black pits of misanthropic pessimisim served up with a slightly desperate, resigned sarcasm. I always like to think of HD as old diatribalist/Inquizitor...but with a sense of humor.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Game of Thrones - mostly
And also a huge supporter of Big government into just about every aspect of our lives. The biggest rent seekers the world has ever known. Laugh all you want, I am right and you know it. They contribute and build nothing and expect to get paid for it.
-
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am
Re: Game of Thrones - mostly
Interesting article that explains my point about Dany going mad since season 1 in more detail than I have.
https://asoiaf.westeros.org/index.php?/ ... shadowing/
https://asoiaf.westeros.org/index.php?/ ... shadowing/
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Game of Thrones - mostly
The better question is why?Kath wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2019 11:24 amInteresting article that explains my point about Dany going mad since season 1 in more detail than I have.
https://asoiaf.westeros.org/index.php?/ ... shadowing/
Inbreeding? The burdens of leadership? Not getting what she wants?
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Game of Thrones - mostly
Deep seeded insecurity creating a self fulfilling prophecy.clubgop wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2019 11:46 amThe better question is why?Kath wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2019 11:24 amInteresting article that explains my point about Dany going mad since season 1 in more detail than I have.
https://asoiaf.westeros.org/index.php?/ ... shadowing/
Inbreeding? The burdens of leadership? Not getting what she wants?
*yip*
-
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am
Re: Game of Thrones - mostly
A self entitled woman who comes from in-breeding and a crazy father. She wants it, she feels entitled to it and she has the right amount of crazy to envelope herself in cognitive dissonance.clubgop wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2019 11:46 amThe better question is why?Kath wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2019 11:24 amInteresting article that explains my point about Dany going mad since season 1 in more detail than I have.
https://asoiaf.westeros.org/index.php?/ ... shadowing/
Inbreeding? The burdens of leadership? Not getting what she wants?
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?
-
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm
Re: Game of Thrones - mostly
Too bad westeros isn't a democracy, she'd be a shoo in.
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND
-
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Re: Game of Thrones - mostly
I'd like to think that the connection to their dragons that the Targaryans and the other dragonlords that existed before the Valyrian nobility were all but decimated, fed their hunger for blood, destruction and conquest. As in, in the bonding with the dragon, they essentially warg the dragon and like they explain in the books with warging - the warg assumes parts of their preferred animal's behavior. In short, the Valyrians became world conquerors because dragons like to destroy, consume, and dominate. Eventually it would be transferred genetically, like the "warg" gene is passed on, so even if the Targaryans didn't have dragons for almost 200 years, they still had the genetic trait.
Or that's my theory, anyway. Given how my theory panned out last time, I'm not holding out much hope on this one being valid, either, though.
Or that's my theory, anyway. Given how my theory panned out last time, I'm not holding out much hope on this one being valid, either, though.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am
Re: Game of Thrones - mostly
Nice and very plausible.BjornP wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2019 12:13 pmI'd like to think that the connection to their dragons that the Targaryans and the other dragonlords that existed before the Valyrian nobility were all but decimated, fed their hunger for blood, destruction and conquest. As in, in the bonding with the dragon, they essentially warg the dragon and like they explain in the books with warging - the warg assumes parts of their preferred animal's behavior. In short, the Valyrians became world conquerors because dragons like to destroy, consume, and dominate. Eventually it would be transferred genetically, like the "warg" gene is passed on, so even if the Targaryans didn't have dragons for almost 200 years, they still had the genetic trait.
Or that's my theory, anyway. Given how my theory panned out last time, I'm not holding out much hope on this one being valid, either, though.
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?