2020 election

[StCapps]

So nuh-uh? That's all you got? Insightful analysis, as always.....

Everything he does is pure shekel cuck conservatism. He is an old boomer like any other.

Trump spends like a drunken sailor, and he could spend a lot more if he wanted to, he ain't no fiscal conservative bro, don't let the tax cuts fool you.

[The Conservative]

Capps crashed and burned on this one. LMFAO

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/03/joe-bid ... oogle.html

That Joe Biden parody site is outranking his actual campaign website. Hilarious.

So? Dude is still the front runner, that doesn't mean anything.
/shrugs

Quit jumping the gun, wait until Biden actually crashes and burns, it's not that unlikely to happen, but nothing has happened that has torpedoed him yet, let alone a parody site.

Grasping at straws dude, Biden is up 14-30 points in all the latest polls, up 20 points on Sanders on aggregate, seriously dumb of you to claim he's done right now, like next level retarded, seeing only what you want to see wishful thinking.

If anything Biden's chances of winning have gone up since last time you claimed he was done and he was nowhere near done, ever since he announced he's been surging, I expected him to get a bump, but even I underestimated how much of a bump him announcing would have. He's at 44% in the latest poll, up 30 points on Sanders, in a packed field dude.

Try actual analysis that isn't obviously influenced by what you want to happen.

Clinton has 90% of winning.

[StCapps]

Capps crashed and burned on this one. LMFAO

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/03/joe-bid ... oogle.html

That Joe Biden parody site is outranking his actual campaign website. Hilarious.

So? Dude is still the front runner, that doesn't mean anything.
/shrugs

Quit jumping the gun, wait until Biden actually crashes and burns, it's not that unlikely to happen, but nothing has happened that has torpedoed him yet, let alone a parody site.

Grasping at straws dude, Biden is up 14-30 points in all the latest polls, up 20 points on Sanders on aggregate, seriously dumb of you to claim he's done right now, like next level retarded, seeing only what you want to see wishful thinking.

If anything Biden's chances of winning have gone up since last time you claimed he was done and he was nowhere near done, ever since he announced he's been surging, I expected him to get a bump, but even I underestimated how much of a bump him announcing would have. He's at 44% in the latest poll, up 30 points on Sanders, in a packed field dude.

Try actual analysis that isn't obviously influenced by what you want to happen.

Clinton has 90% of winning.

That isn't 90% of the vote, that percentage chance of winning the election based on the polls, which were on average only 2-3 points off.

Even that analysis says Trump would win if he won Ohio, Florida, Michigan and North Carolina which they had as "too close to call" toss ups, and Pennsylvania which was only leaned Clinton by 3 points and Trump won Pennsylvania with a margin less than 1 point.

The polls were wrong, but not nearly as wrong as you seem to believe, the polls weren't off by 20 points in 2016, not even close, they were only off by around 2-3 points in key swing states, within the margin of error.

If you think the polls in 2020 are going to be off by 20 points or more, you are just being silly. Biden has the lead right now, suggesting otherwise is asinine.

[Speaker to Animals]

There's nothing for the Internet to talk about with Biden except all his horrible traits. Same as Hillary in 2016.

Meanwhile, for such a fringe candidate with no chance, you all spent a solid month discussing his big idea in UBI. What is Biden's big idea? That's right. He has nothing. He is running on "I'm Joe Biden!"

Good luck with that.

Donald Trump had the biggest name recognition of any candidate in 2016, and more so than any democrat this cycle. But Trump didn't run on just his name. He ran on a big idea that actually matters to the electorate.

Yang is essentially running with the same problems Trump addressed as a basis, but with a completely different strategy to redress them.

Bernie runs on the income inequality and the big idea of socializing everything. I doubt that is going to resonate while Venezuela literally burns.

Tulsi Battle Angel is running on shutting down the wars of empire. That might not resonate because 90% of the voters don't actually have to pay the costs of these wars and therefore couldn't give less a shit about the problem unless Tulsi can explain how it affects them.

There has to be ideas to discuss and debate, or we are just going to debate what horrible people the candidates are. It's the ideas, stupid.

[StCapps]

Clinton was the frontrunner in the Dem nomination in 2016 and she won, Biden is the frontrunner, and he's the most likely to win. Not being able to beat Trump, doesn't mean he's going to lose the primary, since all other candidates would fare worse against Trump, same was true for Clinton in 2016.

Clinton was the most electable Democrat in 2016, and Biden is the most electable Democrat in 2020, and that's what is going to win the nomination, the Dems don't care about ideas, they care about trying to beat Trump, hence their entire platform being "We're not Trump".

It's the Electability, stupid. Ideas, Smideas, Bumper Sticker Slogans and Charisma ftw.

[Speaker to Animals]

Yeah, maybe Biden can magically win five coin tosses in a row and murder any DNC employee who dares to leak emails showing the DNC rigged the primary again. LMFAO

[StCapps]

Yeah, maybe Biden can magically win five coin tosses in a row and murder any DNC employee who dares to leak emails showing the DNC rigged the primary again. LMFAO

Hillary won the primary because she received more votes than Bernie Sanders in more states. Sanders didn't lose because it was rigged, he lost because he's not as electable. Take the superdelegates out of it, and she would have won easily anyway.

[Speaker to Animals]

She won the primary because she rigged it in her favor, including rigging something like four or five coin tosses, which was so mathematically improbable that it's obvious she cheated.

[StCapps]

She won the primary because she rigged it in her favor, including rigging something like four or five coin tosses, which was so mathematically improbable that it's obvious she cheated.

The cheating didn't effect the outcome. If she hadn't cheated at all, she still would have won. She did not win a bunch of coin tosses which swung the primary, she smashed up on Bernie in most states. Attributing that to cheating alone is asinine, wtf are you talking about?

[Speaker to Animals]

She won the primary because she rigged it in her favor, including rigging something like four or five coin tosses, which was so mathematically improbable that it's obvious she cheated.

The cheating didn't effect the outcome. If she hadn't cheated at all, she still would have won. She did not win a bunch of coin tosses, she smashed up on Bernie in most states, wtf are you talking about?

The word you meant was affect, not effect, and yes it definitely did affect the outcome.

https://nypost.com/2017/11/02/ex-dnc-ch ... m-primary/