DBTrek wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 2:12 pm
Smitty-48 wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 2:10 pm
DBTrek wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2019 2:08 pm
One of the designers also claimed that communications to high command were polled, and if successful, deadhand would shut down.
Meaning that a single nuke can’t trigger it unless all communication between responding silos and high command have also been severed.
So ... I see brilliant, not apocalyptic vortex in waiting.
That's all speculation as well.
I don't personally find Russian safety measures to be particularly reliable.
Speculation from one of the guys who designed the system:
https://www.wired.com/2009/09/mf-deadhand/
Again, I don't have much faith in the Soviet made Russian maintained sensors and associated comms network.
And it has to be hair trigger once it's switched on, due to the Trident II SLBM depressed trajectory profile.
For it to work, it has to work fast, so "not hair trigger" is only the case when it is switched off.
It most likely has two modes, semi autonomous and fully autonomous.
But that all hinges on 40 year old Soviet tech working exactly as it is supposed to.