2020 election
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: 2020 election
The intersectional left and the establishment corporate liberals aren't the same thing. SJW's may be repeating bullshit talking points like the NPCs they are, but that doesn't make them establishment corporate liberals.
The SJWs are not the establishment, they are a vocal fringe minority, who the corporate liberals occasionally pander to, because they mistakenly believe there are more SJWs than there really is. Since the SJWs are more prominent within the social media bubble they live in, than they are in rest of America, that plays a big role in that faulty perception.
SJWs don't win Democrats elections in swing districts or swing states, moderate corporate liberals do. Cultural Marxism doesn't sell except in big cities and college towns, the rest of America ain't buying.
The SJWs are not the establishment, they are a vocal fringe minority, who the corporate liberals occasionally pander to, because they mistakenly believe there are more SJWs than there really is. Since the SJWs are more prominent within the social media bubble they live in, than they are in rest of America, that plays a big role in that faulty perception.
SJWs don't win Democrats elections in swing districts or swing states, moderate corporate liberals do. Cultural Marxism doesn't sell except in big cities and college towns, the rest of America ain't buying.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: 2020 election
what a retardJulian Castro: If, under the Constitution, we compensate people because we take their property, why wouldn't you compensate people who actually were property?
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: 2020 election
They are all dead Julian, that's why.pineapplemike wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 6:03 pm
what a retardJulian Castro: If, under the Constitution, we compensate people because we take their property, why wouldn't you compensate people who actually were property?
*yip*
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: 2020 election
Dont have to be the same to be similar. They are huge allies of convenience. When race baiters like Al Sharpton shakedown a corporation you dont think the corporation gets nothing do you? They are the money, the fuel for these SJW groups. They thrive on a victim narrative. Cant be a victim if you are running the whole thing, so corporate establishment dems gladly play master while the SJW play unwilling beset upon beneficiary. You are talking about 2 days a year where you think the establishment takes all the power, no, no the other 363 days are done laying the groundwork, paying off the right people. The netroots or nutroots took over the left side of politics in this country more than a decade ago they are a full SJW friendly space.StCapps wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:47 pmThe intersectional left and the establishment corporate liberals aren't the same thing. SJW's may be repeating bullshit talking points like the NPCs they are, but that doesn't make them establishment corporate liberals.
The SJWs are not the establishment, they are a vocal fringe minority, who the corporate liberals occasionally pander to, because they mistakenly believe there are more SJWs than there really is. Since the SJWs are more prominent within the social media bubble they live in, than they are in rest of America, that plays a big role in that faulty perception.
SJWs don't win Democrats elections in swing districts or swing states, moderate corporate liberals do. Cultural Marxism doesn't sell except in big cities and college towns, the rest of America ain't buying.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: 2020 election
There is some crossover, but the corporate liberals are using the SJWs for their own purposes, they ain't full on SJWs themselves, too many of them are white men to fully back that bullshit. They mouth the words to avoid public lynching, and to appeal to those who live in big city bubbles.clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:30 amDont have to be the same to be similar. They are huge allies of convenience. When race baiters like Al Sharpton shakedown a corporation you dont think the corporation gets nothing do you? They are the money, the fuel for these SJW groups. They thrive on a victim narrative. Cant be a victim if you are running the whole thing, so corporate establishment dems gladly play master while the SJW play unwilling beset upon beneficiary. You are talking about 2 days a year where you think the establishment takes all the power, no, no the other 363 days are done laying the groundwork, paying off the right people. The netroots or nutroots took over the left side of politics in this country more than a decade ago they are a full SJW friendly space.StCapps wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:47 pmThe intersectional left and the establishment corporate liberals aren't the same thing. SJW's may be repeating bullshit talking points like the NPCs they are, but that doesn't make them establishment corporate liberals.
The SJWs are not the establishment, they are a vocal fringe minority, who the corporate liberals occasionally pander to, because they mistakenly believe there are more SJWs than there really is. Since the SJWs are more prominent within the social media bubble they live in, than they are in rest of America, that plays a big role in that faulty perception.
SJWs don't win Democrats elections in swing districts or swing states, moderate corporate liberals do. Cultural Marxism doesn't sell except in big cities and college towns, the rest of America ain't buying.
If a far left candidate wins, they are doing it with the help of the establishment, not over their protest, if they don't win, it's because the more moderate establishment candidate wasn't thrown under the bus because of electability issues. Hard for the far left to sell that the moderate establishment candidate is unelectable when they are even more unelectable in a presidential election.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 25286
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: 2020 election
"Qualified" to be President is a fallacy.
The least "Qualified" was President was Abraham Lincoln.
The least "Qualified" was President was Abraham Lincoln.
Nec Aspera Terrent