William Barr > Charlemenge
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: William Barr > Charlemenge
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
StCapps
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: William Barr > Charlemenge
What are you going to say, once the report is released? "Some of it is still redacted, the smoking gun must still be in there somewhere, despite both Barr and Mueller saying it isn't.", that's my bet.
Guilty until proven innocent, Demohacks will never let it go.
*yip*
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: William Barr > Charlemenge
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: William Barr > Charlemenge
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
StCapps
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: William Barr > Charlemenge
This is what cognitive dissonance looks like. Troll away monte.
*yip*
-
StCapps
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: William Barr > Charlemenge
The Democrats set that bar, not Barr. Now they are moving the goalposts.
*yip*
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: William Barr > Charlemenge
Also disgusting hypocrisy. Imagine what people like Monty would say if you sexually mocked a female politician like that. These people are truly degenerate filth.
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: William Barr > Charlemenge
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: William Barr > Charlemenge
How do you prove a negative, Monty?
The scene that comes to my mind was towards the end of McArthy's hearings where somebody pointed out to him that there is no proof that this person was a communist, and McArthy's reply was: "but there is no proof he is not a communist".
https://www.fallacyfiles.org/ignorant.html
This is a frightening reign of terror mentality, man.
The scene that comes to my mind was towards the end of McArthy's hearings where somebody pointed out to him that there is no proof that this person was a communist, and McArthy's reply was: "but there is no proof he is not a communist".
https://www.fallacyfiles.org/ignorant.html
This is a frightening reign of terror mentality, man.
-
clubgop
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: William Barr > Charlemenge
See? Why should he get the benefit of the doubt? He'll never give it to you. He goes around making all these allegations without a shred of proof, but I am the bad guy for pointing out his child predatory behavior? If Monte wants I'll release an unredacted report for my two year "investigation" and we'll see how exonerated he feels.