Indeed, the Japanese high command did not surrender because of the firebombing nor the bomb, they surrendered because they were holding out hope for the Soviets to intervene on their behalf against the Americans, when it became clear that the Soviets were invading with the Americans, only then did they choose to surrender to the Americans to avoid being overrun by the Soviets.heydaralon wrote: Fri Mar 29, 2019 1:43 pmLets say we didn't drop Fat Man and Little Boy on the nips. Would firebombing them repeatedly to the point of redundancy like LeMay was doing have caused Japan to surrender eventually without an invasion? If so, how much longer could they have held out? In this thought experiment we are assuming that Russia doesn't declare war on them like it did irl.Smitty-48 wrote: Fri Mar 29, 2019 1:39 pm LeMay was also one of the last American General's to truly be in command.
It was his war plan, it was his formation, it was LeMay's call, once the NCA gave the go codes.
More authority at his disposal on the battlefield, than Ulysses S. Grant himself.
None the less, was LeMay who put them in this position, as the warfighting capacity was reduced to the point of being overrun. Dropping the bombs was a message to the Soviets, BTFO, the first action of the Cold War.