One-Issue Voting

[Martin Hash]

It was a good question until you equivocated male supremacy with truth, justice, and the American Way.

Are you conflating "patriarchy" with "The Patriarchy"? So The Matriarchy of you.

Words have meaning. Collective meaning in a society. That’s quite matriarchal (the collective society vs. anarchist barbarians).

You seem unaware that "The Patriarchy" is NOT my term; it's a Feminist term, and they spell out what it means, saying that lots of women are in The Patriarchy too. "The Matriarchy" is MY term; I define it to be Collectivism, Equality & Globalism; the opposite of The Patriarchy, and it has lots of men in it too.

[Speaker to Animals]

The way the neoliberals play this game is by enforcing the idea that the only legitimate split is between the two sides of neoliberalism. If you object to neoliberalism, period, then they label you extremist or "far-right/far-left". These days, anything that goes off the neoliberal rails online is just plain censored as hate speech or some other nonsensical excuse.

Absolute liberalization of the economy is a disaster for the vast majority of people. Absolute liberalization of personal morals results in tyranny. Liberalization seems to result in one of two tyrannies: corporate or state. If you completely liberalize the economy, people become economic serfs to a corporate economic system. If you completely liberalize morals, bad shit doesn't just get legalized but becomes compulsory and dissent is criminalized.

[MilSpecs]

Supremacy is enforced, not given.

Fixed it for you.

Enforcement requires effort. Efforts can succeed or fail. A successful effort earns rewards.
You didn't need to fix it for me, it was fine.

Either way, the idea that we're going to vote for male or female supremacy is hilarious to me.
Like we're going to vote on gravity.
Supremacy is going to those that earn it, and all the voting in the world ain't changing that.

We shouldn’t vote for either.

I didn’t make up the question, BTW. If the intent was to ask if it’s possible for a party representative to have different core values than the party, then no. If the intent was to ask if secondary values should carry the same weight as core values, that’s apparently happening. Should it happen? No, not in my opinion.

[Speaker to Animals]

Women are by nature dependent upon men to survive. Without men, very few women would be able to perform basic tasks. Men are the ones who build your houses. Men build and maintain your power grid. Men build and maintain your sanitation system. Men by and large are the ones who protect you from violence and fire. Men are the ones who predominantly die on the battlefield.

But like the fact that women see probably half or more of men as invisible to them, the fact that women are utterly dependent upon us is invisible to these liberal women who want to play pretend they can do it just like men. Except they don't. They don't put in the hard work like men. There are few women doing hard labor. None of these feminist women are arguing for gender equality in workplace deaths, combat, etc. They just want what they see gets them social approval.

[Montegriffo]

Women are by nature dependent upon men to survive. Without men, very few women would be able to perform basic tasks. Men are the ones who build your houses. Men build and maintain your power grid. Men build and maintain your sanitation system. Men by and large are the ones who protect you from violence and fire. Men are the ones who predominantly die on the battlefield.

But like the fact that women see probably half or more of men as invisible to them, the fact that women are utterly dependent upon us is invisible to these liberal women who want to play pretend they can do it just like men. Except they don't. They don't put in the hard work like men. There are few women doing hard labor. None of these feminist women are arguing for gender equality in workplace deaths, combat, etc. They just want what they see gets them social approval.

Yawn.
We all know what your single issue is already. You don't have to keep telling us.

[MilSpecs]

And again the insanity will derail the conversation.

[Speaker to Animals]

It's the truth.

[Martin Hash]

Women are by nature dependent upon men to survive. Without men, very few women would be able to perform basic tasks. Men are the ones who build your houses. Men build and maintain your power grid. Men build and maintain your sanitation system. Men by and large are the ones who protect you from violence and fire. Men are the ones who predominantly die on the battlefield.

But like the fact that women see probably half or more of men as invisible to them, the fact that women are utterly dependent upon us is invisible to these liberal women who want to play pretend they can do it just like men. Except they don't. They don't put in the hard work like men. There are few women doing hard labor. None of these feminist women are arguing for gender equality in workplace deaths, combat, etc. They just want what they see gets them social approval.

This is all true and will remain so as long as there's a difference in testosterone between the sexes. Wingnut Feminists already recognize this and demonize testosterone or its attributes at every opportunity; I predict a call for feminizing boys. The Left is ready, just look how accepting they are to transgendering.

[Speaker to Animals]

This also is the crux of cultural Marxism. White women resent that white men achieve so much and that our technological civilization would be impossible without us, but not them. So they aligned themselves with other demographics that contribute very little as a whole. If you take the "progressive stack" and just look at it, it's basically a ranked listing of people who contribute the least to the technological civilization we live in.

The patriarchy is just the people who build and maintain shit. The matriarchy are the people who never built anything, never sacrificed, barely worked any hard labor in their lives, and utterly resent those who do.

You don't see Asian men on that stack. I wonder why??

[Speaker to Animals]

Women are by nature dependent upon men to survive. Without men, very few women would be able to perform basic tasks. Men are the ones who build your houses. Men build and maintain your power grid. Men build and maintain your sanitation system. Men by and large are the ones who protect you from violence and fire. Men are the ones who predominantly die on the battlefield.

But like the fact that women see probably half or more of men as invisible to them, the fact that women are utterly dependent upon us is invisible to these liberal women who want to play pretend they can do it just like men. Except they don't. They don't put in the hard work like men. There are few women doing hard labor. None of these feminist women are arguing for gender equality in workplace deaths, combat, etc. They just want what they see gets them social approval.

This is all true and will remain so as long as there's a difference in testosterone between the sexes. Wingnut Feminists already recognize this and demonize testosterone or its attributes at every opportunity; I predict a call for feminizing boys. The Left is ready, just look how accepting they are to transgendering.

I think you will see the beginnings of it when the betas start taking drugs to lower their testosterone.