This is MAGA country!

[DBTrek]

Wait, monte thinks smollett didn’t do it?

It's either that or your legal system sucks.
I'm leaning towards the later.

Ain't no lean:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicksibill ... 13ab005c16

Daaaaaaaaaaaamn.
California innovates a new method of direct taxation.

[Speaker to Animals]

But why can't we convince people to give a shit about #BlueLivesMatter???

[nmoore63]

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled it was “not obvious” that theft by cop would violate their Fourth Amendment rights. Writing for a unanimous court, Judge Milan Smith held that even if police officers did steal (an allegation they repeatedly denied), the two men “did not have a clearly established Fourth or Fourteenth Amendment right to be free from the theft of property seized pursuant to a warrant.”

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

We are fucked.

[MilSpecs]

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled it was “not obvious” that theft by cop would violate their Fourth Amendment rights. Writing for a unanimous court, Judge Milan Smith held that even if police officers did steal (an allegation they repeatedly denied), the two men “did not have a clearly established Fourth or Fourteenth Amendment right to be free from the theft of property seized pursuant to a warrant.”

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

We are fucked.

Yep. Apparently a reasonable search and seizure allows subsequent government theft.

I didn’t see anything about whether the cops were prosecuted for theft, or even if they lost their jobs.

[Montegriffo]

Wait, monte thinks smollett didn’t do it?

It's either that or your legal system sucks.
I'm leaning towards the later.

Ain't no lean:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicksibill ... 13ab005c16

Too much politics in your legal system.
Particularly in the way you choose your Supreme Court judges.

[nmoore63]

Yep. Apparently a reasonable search and seizure allows subsequent government theft.

I didn’t see anything about whether the cops were prosecuted for theft, or even if they lost their jobs.

the ruling was to specifically say they couldn’t be prosecuted.

[DBTrek]

So the social power structure in California is apparently:
1. Non-citizens
2. Police
3. Homosexuals
4. Everyone else

Well, we wanted each state to be its own laboratory . . . there you go.
/shrug

[The Conservative]

It's either that or your legal system sucks.
I'm leaning towards the later.

Ain't no lean:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicksibill ... 13ab005c16

Too much politics in your legal system.
Particularly in the way you choose your Supreme Court judges.

This is California, if you don’t understand that answer, then you don’t understand the US.

[MilSpecs]

So the social power structure in California is apparently:
1. Non-citizens
2. Police
3. Homosexuals
4. Everyone else

Well, we wanted each state to be its own laboratory . . . there you go.
/shrug

ICE is always top dog. They can search and seize anyone on your list.

[MilSpecs]

Yep. Apparently a reasonable search and seizure allows subsequent government theft.

I didn’t see anything about whether the cops were prosecuted for theft, or even if they lost their jobs.

the ruling was to specifically say they couldn’t be prosecuted.

(Slaps forehead) Thank you.