Russia! Russia!! Russia!!!

[Smitty-48]

Replacing Scalia with Garland instead of Gorsuch, America would be so much better off. Yup, sure would, bahaha.

Mission accomplished, I don't care about 6-3, abortion is not my issue and I bet they won't overthrow Roe anyways, even at 6-3 they will invoke stare decisis.

[StCapps]

Replacing Scalia with Garland instead of Gorsuch, America would be so much better off. Yup, sure would, bahaha.

Mission accomplished, I don't care about 6-3, abortion is not my issue and I bet they won't overthrow Roe anyways, even at 6-3 they will invoke stare decisis.

There are other missions to accomplish, and Trump would better at accomplishing those missions than any Democrat running against him. Just because he locked down the SCOTUS, doesn't mean he has no further utility.

At least you immediately backpeddled on the Hillary would have better bullshit though, silly Smitty.

[Smitty-48]

By your own criteria, there aren't better alternatives to Trump, so why are you fronting as if there is?

The Democrats could very well be, I'm not a Hillary hater, I think America would be much better off now if Hillary had won.

That's a good one. You're a funny guy.

What? I like Hilary. I've always liked Hillary, she's an Uberhawk.

What do I care if they bomb Libya or wherever? Bomb the shit out of it, big whoop.

Use F-35's

[Smitty-48]

Replacing Scalia with Garland instead of Gorsuch, America would be so much better off. Yup, sure would, bahaha.

Mission accomplished, I don't care about 6-3, abortion is not my issue and I bet they won't overthrow Roe anyways, even at 6-3 they will invoke stare decisis.

There are other missions to accomplish, and Trump would better at accomplishing those missions than any Democrat running against him. Just because he locked down the SCOTUS, doesn't mean he has no further utility.

He doesn't have anymore to accomplish for me, I don't care if America recognizes the Golan Heights as sovereign Israeli territory, the Jews already control it, so it's just pandering to them.

[StCapps]

The Democrats could very well be, I'm not a Hillary hater, I think America would be much better off now if Hillary had won.

That's a good one. You're a funny guy.

What? I like Hilary. I've always liked Hillary, she's an Uberhawk.

What do I care if they bomb Libya or wherever? Bomb the shit out of it, big whoop.

Use F-35's

You wouldn't like the SCOTUS under her though, and that's a little more important, Trump was easily the lesser of two evils, don't snow.

[Smitty-48]

That's a good one. You're a funny guy.

What? I like Hilary. I've always liked Hillary, she's an Uberhawk.

What do I care if they bomb Libya or wherever? Bomb the shit out of it, big whoop.

Use F-35's

You wouldn't like the SCOTUS under her though, and that's a little more important, Trump was easily the lesser of two evils, don't snow.

Doesn't matter to me in a practical sense, Hillary is not confiscatory, she would have given Wall Street a blowjob too.

[StCapps]

What? I like Hilary. I've always liked Hillary, she's an Uberhawk.

What do I care if they bomb Libya or wherever? Bomb the shit out of it, big whoop.

Use F-35's

You wouldn't like the SCOTUS under her though, and that's a little more important, Trump was easily the lesser of two evils, don't snow.

Doesn't matter to me in a practical sense, Hillary is not confiscatory, she would have given Wall Street a blowjob too.

Hillary is a free speech hater and a gun grabber, and she would have nominated at least one SCOTUS judge that is as well, likely to replace Kennedy. Not confiscatory my ass. Go home, you're drunk.

It was crucial that the Democrats didn't win in 2016, on the SCOTUS alone. America would not be better off if she won, that's flat out ridiculous, the SCOTUS would be 6-3 Democrats right now if she had won, plus Ginsburg would retire so Clinton could have replaced her with a younger version of herself. That's a fucking nightmare right there for the first and second amendments.

[Smitty-48]

You wouldn't like the SCOTUS under her though, and that's a little more important, Trump was easily the lesser of two evils, don't snow.

Doesn't matter to me in a practical sense, Hillary is not confiscatory, she would have given Wall Street a blowjob too.

Hillary is a free speech hater and a gun grabber, and she would have nominated at least one SCOTUS judge that is as well, likely to replace Kennedy. Not confiscatory my ass. Go home, you're drunk.

It was crucial that the Democrats didn't win in 2016, on the SCOTUS alone. America would not be better off if she won, that's flat out ridiculous.

I don't care, I live in Canada. The Democrats are the popular majority, so apparently most Americans are speech banning gun grabbers, don't brame me roundeye, they would none the less spend more money, even on the Pentagon, because Trump can't actually getting any significant passed. Trump has gridlock with the GOP.

[StCapps]

You keep moving the goalposts, and are clearly trolling at this point. All you have is criticism of Trump, and nothing on how any of the alternatives would be better than him. I can criticize Trump too, but you don't see me claiming the alternatives are better when the criteria I use to decide that indicates the opposite, yet you insist on being devil's advocate for the sake of being devil's advocate anyway.

[StCapps]

Trump is spending like a drunken sailor compared to every POTUS who came before him, including Obama, and I find it hard to believe that any Green New Deal Democrat is going to be able to spend more without gridlock preventing them.