Russia! Russia!! Russia!!!

[StCapps]

Tulsi Gabbard doesn't have a snowballs chance in hell of winning the Democrat nomination, let alone to beat Trump. I like Tulsi too, but she's not going to win, so pining for that unicorn will lead to nothing but disappointment. Same with Andrew Yang.

[Smitty-48]

Is Karmalla Harris a better option when dealing with the National Command Authority?

Why not?

If you think Kamalla Harris is going to spend more on the military than Trump, I find that to be a comical assertion.

The budget will remain about the same, there is budget gridlock, the Democrats are not going to slash the Pentagon.

The Democrats however are more likely to be aggressive about INF and BMD, it's actually an Obama legacy project.

[Smitty-48]

Tulsi Gabbard doesn't have a snowballs chance in hell of winning the Democrat nomination, let alone to beat Trump. I like Tulsi too, but she's not going to win, realpolitik.

Realpolitik is that there is a hawkish wing in the Democrat party still, it should be nurtured.

[StCapps]

Is Karmalla Harris a better option when dealing with the National Command Authority?

Why not?

If you think Kamalla Harris is going to spend more on the military than Trump, I find that to be a comical assertion.

The budget will remain about the same, there is budget gridlock, the Democrats are not going to slash the Pentagon.

The Democrats however are more likely to be aggressive about INF and BMD, it's actually an Obama legacy project.

The Democrats aren't going slash the Pentagon, but they likely won't spend as much as Trump will. Kamala Harris can't beat Trump anyway.

[StCapps]

Tulsi Gabbard doesn't have a snowballs chance in hell of winning the Democrat nomination, let alone to beat Trump. I like Tulsi too, but she's not going to win, realpolitik.

Realpolitik is that there is a hawkish wing in the Democrat party still, it should be nurtured.

Tulsi ain't no hawk, she's playing the less foreign entanglements card, same as Trump. She's Democrat Ron Paul on the foreign policy tip, she has zero chance of winning over the hawks in Democrat party.

A vote for Tulsi Gabbard is not a vote to empower the Hawks in the Democrat Party.

[Smitty-48]

If you think Kamalla Harris is going to spend more on the military than Trump, I find that to be a comical assertion.

The budget will remain about the same, there is budget gridlock, the Democrats are not going to slash the Pentagon.

The Democrats however are more likely to be aggressive about INF and BMD, it's actually an Obama legacy project.

The Democrats aren't going slash the Pentagon, but they likely won't spend as much as Trump will. Kamala Harris can't beat Trump anyway.

Realpoltik; I'm not voting in the election so I don't care who is likely to win, that's not relevant to mid to long term analysis in any case.

[Smitty-48]

Tulsi Gabbard doesn't have a snowballs chance in hell of winning the Democrat nomination, let alone to beat Trump. I like Tulsi too, but she's not going to win, realpolitik.

Realpolitik is that there is a hawkish wing in the Democrat party still, it should be nurtured.

Tulsi ain't no hawk, she's playing the less foreign entanglements card, same as Trump. She's Democrat Ron Paul on the foreign policy tip, she has zero chance of winning over the hawks in Democrat party.

A vote for Tulsi Gabbard is not a vote to empower the Hawks in the Democrat Party.

The Supercounterforce is America First, Splendid Isolation requires a Fortress America most of all.

The Democrats are more aggressive on Supercounterforce, regardless of how much they spend.

[StCapps]

I don't see any Demohawks running who are more hawkish than Trump, so I find your analysis to be off.

[Smitty-48]

I don't see any Demohawks running who are more hawkish than Trump, so I find your analysis to be off.

I find your analysis to simply be you repeating over and over who is likely to win an election like an autist.

[StCapps]

Realpolitik is that there is a hawkish wing in the Democrat party still, it should be nurtured.

Tulsi ain't no hawk, she's playing the less foreign entanglements card, same as Trump. She's Democrat Ron Paul on the foreign policy tip, she has zero chance of winning over the hawks in Democrat party.

A vote for Tulsi Gabbard is not a vote to empower the Hawks in the Democrat Party.

The Supercounterforce is America First, Splendid Isolation requires a Fortress America most of all.

The Democrats are more aggressive on Supercounterforce, regardless of how much they spend.

Trump seems more in favor of Supercounterforce than Tulsi Gabbard dude, why you'd trust her to be more Hawkish than Trump, makes no sense to me.