Russia! Russia!! Russia!!!

[pineapplemike]

@ManDaveJobGood
Trump got away with it because the Dems refused to fund the walls that were closing in on him

LOL

[clubgop]

lol thats funny in context but it would be met with responses of "putin is way more corrupt than the fbi." looking for something more undeniable and harder to refute

If your looking for bumper sticker or tweet you wont get it. At least I can't think of it. But lengthy, list the evidence for each proposition first for FBI corruption than list the evidence for Russian asset but take the evidence from the Obama administration and attribute it to Trump and then reveal the joke, it should be obvious to most of the audience.

[PartyOf5]

Meanwhile, i am surprised they couldn’t get him on some kind of underhanded real estate deals worked out with Putin. That says to me that this was never going to be a serious investigation. It was cover for Hillary. Plain and simple.

Here's the excuse making. If it was a serious investigation they would have nailed him with something. See, he's still guilty of......something.....we just need to look harder.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Meanwhile, i am surprised they couldn’t get him on some kind of underhanded real estate deals worked out with Putin. That says to me that this was never going to be a serious investigation. It was cover for Hillary. Plain and simple.

Here's the excuse making. If it was a serious investigation they would have nailed him with something. See, he's still guilty of......something.....we just need to look harder.

Nah. They could have hit him with “obstruction of justice” if they wanted to. That’s the catch-all for any investigation.

I tell you, it was cover. Nothing more.

[Fife]

[SuburbanFarmer]

Share your thoughts.

[StCapps]

Meanwhile, i am surprised they couldn’t get him on some kind of underhanded real estate deals worked out with Putin. That says to me that this was never going to be a serious investigation. It was cover for Hillary. Plain and simple.

Here's the excuse making. If it was a serious investigation they would have nailed him with something. See, he's still guilty of......something.....we just need to look harder.

Nah. They could have hit him with “obstruction of justice” if they wanted to. That’s the catch-all for any investigation.

I tell you, it was cover. Nothing more.

No they couldn't have hit him with "obstruction of justice" or they would have. They wanted to, but they had nothing on him. Trump not getting indicted isn't an indication that they didn't want to nail him to wall, it's evidence that they found nothing to nail him to the wall with, despite turning over every possible rock to see if they could find something that fits that description.

Many forum members here called that once Trump wasn't indicted, the other side would simply say that Mueller was trying to cover for Trump, moving the goalposts from "Lets wait for The Mueller Report before assuming it's a political witch hunt, until then we'll give Mueller the benefit of the doubt" to "The Mueller Report doesn't say what we thought it would, therefore Mueller was secretly working for Trump the entire time, or he would have caught him". And right on cue, here you are, peddling that bullshit, the only difference is that you claim it's to cover for Clinton.

Trump is clean, but you refuse to admit it, you just assume it was because they didn't look hard enough, otherwise they would have caught him.

Sad.

[clubgop]

Share your thoughts.

Fuck you, you partisan hack bitch.

[Ph64]

Russia, Russia, Russia, Putin, Russia, Communism, Russia, Soviet Union, Russia, Russia, Russia!!

[Speaker to Animals]

Into Tulsi's open arms they go..