Fuck. That's some bad luck.Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 6:26 pmHere's a freak one; guy didn't get killed but was permanently injured.
A storm whipped up and the wind blew a modular tent across a field.
Corporal with his back turned to it teaching a lecture in said field.
Spike from the tent pole impales him in the head.
Plutarch on animal ethics
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
I watched it go down. I could see the tent coming and I was yelling at him but he couldn't hear me over the wind.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 6:29 pmFuck. That's some bad luck.Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 6:26 pmHere's a freak one; guy didn't get killed but was permanently injured.
A storm whipped up and the wind blew a modular tent across a field.
Corporal with his back turned to it teaching a lecture in said field.
Spike from the tent pole impales him in the head.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
When I got to him, it was like a GSW to the head, I could see his brains, so I thought he was Pri 4 right there.
The brain surgeons managed to patch him back together. Sort of.
The brain surgeons managed to patch him back together. Sort of.
Last edited by Smitty-48 on Thu Mar 21, 2019 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
Nah, these are word games. When I say experience pain, we all know it’s about a conscious experience, that’s why when you’re under anathesia you don’t experience pain, you’re unconscious. So this bicameralism theory is all mush-mouth word games.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 6:28 pmNow you are talking about a completely different thing. Don't move goalposts. You said the capacity to feel pain. That starts at eight weeks.JohnDonne wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 6:24 pmThe research in your own article says several key points are required, not one key point, several. Which makes sense, consciousness is clearly a complicated phenomenon.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 6:13 pm
https://www.livescience.com/54774-fetal ... hesia.html
Not that I think "feeling pain" is a viable argument for personhood, but if that's your metric, then you should probably place the marker down at around 8 weeks.
I mean.. when this Spartan UBI thing kicks off, the men in the training camps feel pain and lots of them are going to have to get killed for the sake of the unit.
Having a subjective experience of pain is pretty much the philosophical definition of personhood
Consciousness is not something most human adults experience very often. It's really not that common. I can tell you are running on a script right now. Smack yourself in the face. BWAP!
There you go. Now you are conscious.
Only human beings have consciousness, and it's not even clear consciousness is anything but a cultural invention that arises from neuroplasticity. You should read some Julian Jaynes.
And animals in the wild are the most alert, aware beings you’ll see, moreso than most humans.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
Well, no, it is not. Animals can experience pain but they lack consciousness. If consciousness is your metric, then eat BBQ. You are golden.JohnDonne wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 6:37 pmNah, these are word games. When I say experience pain, we all know it’s about a conscious experience, that’s why when you’re under anathesia you don’t experience pain, you’re unconscious. So this bicameralism theory is all mush-mouth word games.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 6:28 pmNow you are talking about a completely different thing. Don't move goalposts. You said the capacity to feel pain. That starts at eight weeks.JohnDonne wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 6:24 pm
The research in your own article says several key points are required, not one key point, several. Which makes sense, consciousness is clearly a complicated phenomenon.
Having a subjective experience of pain is pretty much the philosophical definition of personhood
Consciousness is not something most human adults experience very often. It's really not that common. I can tell you are running on a script right now. Smack yourself in the face. BWAP!
There you go. Now you are conscious.
Only human beings have consciousness, and it's not even clear consciousness is anything but a cultural invention that arises from neuroplasticity. You should read some Julian Jaynes.
And animals in the wild are the most alert, aware beings you’ll see, moreso than most humans.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
Another freaky one, happened a bit before my time, and wasn't even army but rather army cadets.
Buncha cadets sitting around a tent handling what they were told was a dummy grenade.
Turns out a live one got into the mix and one of the kids pulled the pin.
Boom.
Buncha cadets sitting around a tent handling what they were told was a dummy grenade.
Turns out a live one got into the mix and one of the kids pulled the pin.
Boom.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
The only shit I ever saw go wrong was a plane crash and a fucking F-16 leaking hydrazine and almost getting me killed. Both of those had multiple points of failure from my perspective.
I saw LOTS of potential disasters, but we usually catch them (it takes at least three most of the time).
I saw LOTS of potential disasters, but we usually catch them (it takes at least three most of the time).
-
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
Consciousness is my metric. Animals are obviously conscious. We’ve had this argument before though. Look at the causal structures and analogous behavior. They are not in some primordial dream, they are conscious and experience as we doSpeaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 6:40 pmWell, no, it is not. Animals can experience pain but they lack consciousness. If consciousness is your metric, then eat BBQ. You are golden.JohnDonne wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 6:37 pmNah, these are word games. When I say experience pain, we all know it’s about a conscious experience, that’s why when you’re under anathesia you don’t experience pain, you’re unconscious. So this bicameralism theory is all mush-mouth word games.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 6:28 pm
Now you are talking about a completely different thing. Don't move goalposts. You said the capacity to feel pain. That starts at eight weeks.
Consciousness is not something most human adults experience very often. It's really not that common. I can tell you are running on a script right now. Smack yourself in the face. BWAP!
There you go. Now you are conscious.
Only human beings have consciousness, and it's not even clear consciousness is anything but a cultural invention that arises from neuroplasticity. You should read some Julian Jaynes.
And animals in the wild are the most alert, aware beings you’ll see, moreso than most humans.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
I was in a helicopter emergency landing, we weren't hurt, but we were low for autorotation, so when the bottom dropped out I thought we might be dead.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 6:43 pmThe only shit I ever saw go wrong was a plane crash and a fucking F-16 leaking hydrazine and almost getting me killed. Both of those had multiple points of failure from my perspective.
I saw LOTS of potential disasters, but we usually catch them (it takes at least three most of the time).
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
That was RCAF training which saved us, that pilot was a stud, we could have easily rolled into a fireball on that one. It was the tail rotor which failed, but somehow he got it down on the skids.
Nec Aspera Terrent