Smitty-48 wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:32 pm
Notice how he shifts the posts there.
He starts out strong with "Rule of Law in America!"
But wait, says he, "there is something else to consider";
"What about the poor Mexican illegals being raped up in here, think of the Mexican childrens!"
Bait and switch.
Cuck.
He was talking about sovereignty , borders, and enforcing the law. Yet you got that out of it some how...really?
How old are you and how much to you lie about your resume?
I don't submit resumes. I work for myself.
It was a bait and switch, he baited with Rule of Law, then switched to blubbering For The Children Appeal to Pity.
So his rhetoric offended you? When you argue with other people you want to persuade (i know you don't care about other people's opinion and never persuade anyone or care to but assume that you are) then you would never use multiple angles of argumentation to get the goal accomplished? Which in this case is actually having a real border.
GloryofGreece wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:55 pm
He was talking about sovereignty , borders, and enforcing the law. Yet you got that out of it some how...really?
How old are you and how much to you lie about your resume?
I don't submit resumes. I work for myself.
It was a bait and switch, he baited with Rule of Law, then switched to blubbering For The Children Appeal to Pity.
So his rhetoric offended you? When you argue with other people you want to persuade (i know you don't care about other people's opinion and never persuade anyone or care to but assume that you are) then you would never use multiple angles of argumentation to get the goal accomplished? Which in this case is actually having a real border.
You're the one who is offended apparently.
I just called him a cuck because Appeal to Pity is an entirely leftist dogma.
Smitty-48 wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:55 pm
The military is no shield from cuckery.
All of us here who have served, well know that the military is a haven for big government nanny state prohibitionists and bleeding heart crusaders.
And too often a training ground for future perpetually-entitled government employees.
Military is just people, folks. Granted, they’re people who at least accepted the physical risk of securing their nation and its interests from threats. That makes them worth at least 10000x more than run-of-the-mill Internet complainers. But they’re still people, with all the faults and foibles that entails.
Smitty-48 wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:55 pm
The military is no shield from cuckery.
All of us here who have served, well know that the military is a haven for big government nanny state prohibitionists and bleeding heart crusaders.
And too often a training ground for future perpetually-entitled government employees.
Military is just people, folks. Granted, they’re people who at least accepted the physical risk of securing their nation and its interests from threats. That makes them worth at least 10000x more than run-of-the-mill Internet complainers. But they’re still people, with all the faults and foibles that entails.
I'm serious when I say I was a mercenary.
Politically agnostic servant of the Queen for the purposes of doing state sanctioned mass murder on behalf of the British Crown.
Smitty-48 wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2019 1:06 pm
I'm serious when I say I was a mercenary.
Politically agnostic servant of the Queen for the purposes of doing state sanctioned mass murder on behalf of the British Crown.
What special insight does that give me?
It’s not about insight, it’s about utility.
Which is a better person - a know-nothing Internet complainer, or a know-nothing Internet complainer that will put their ass on the line for life and death stakes.
Neither has more insight, one clearly has more utility.
