F35 vs. A10?

F35 vs A10?

F35
7
39%
A10
11
61%
 
Total votes: 18

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: F35 vs. A10?

Post by StCapps » Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:02 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:00 pm
Neither of you have a fucking clue what you have been prattling about for days.
Whenever you are losing an argument, your first instinct is of course to project your own faults on others. We know the drill.
*yip*

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: F35 vs. A10?

Post by Smitty-48 » Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:06 pm

Boeing will carry on, but St. Louis was doomed as soon as the X-35 won the fly off, and they know it, desperate stabs with various repackaging of F-15 and F/A-18 notwithstanding.

In terms of Super Duper Drone, the leader there is actually Northrup Grumman, but again, Commander Data, when he finally appears from his secret lair in Nevada, will simply be a Lockheed Martin F-35 Sensor Fusion Engine on steroids.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: F35 vs. A10?

Post by StCapps » Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:12 pm

Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:06 pm
Boeing will carry on, but St. Louis was doomed as soon as the X-35 won the fly off, and they know it, desperate stabs with various repackaging of F-15 and F/A-18 notwithstanding.

In terms of Super Duper Drone, the leader there is actually Northrup Grumman, but again, Commander Data, when he finally appears from his secret lair in Nevada, will simply be a Lockheed Martin F-35 Sensor Fusion Engine on steroids.
And then the StA's of the world will cry, "expensive boondoggle" when Commander Data is revealed, and he'll go around claiming that F-15X can do everything that Commander Data can for way cheaper. Puh-thetic.

Dude watched too much BSG and thinks he's facing the cylons, so he goes full luddite.
*yip*

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: F35 vs. A10?

Post by Speaker to Animals » Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:15 pm

StCapps wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:02 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:00 pm
Neither of you have a fucking clue what you have been prattling about for days.
Whenever you are losing an argument, your first instinct is of course to project your own faults on others. We know the drill.
I have not lost this argument. I have been laughing my ass off at your ignorance. Both of your. Especially Smitty. This shit has been shared. It's fucking hilarious!

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: F35 vs. A10?

Post by Smitty-48 » Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:15 pm

StCapps wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:12 pm
Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:06 pm
Boeing will carry on, but St. Louis was doomed as soon as the X-35 won the fly off, and they know it, desperate stabs with various repackaging of F-15 and F/A-18 notwithstanding.

In terms of Super Duper Drone, the leader there is actually Northrup Grumman, but again, Commander Data, when he finally appears from his secret lair in Nevada, will simply be a Lockheed Martin F-35 Sensor Fusion Engine on steroids.
And then the StA's of the world will cry, "expensive boondoggle" when Commander Data is revealed, and he'll go around claiming that F-15X can do everything that Commander Data can for way cheaper. Puh-thetic.

Dude watched too much BSG and thinks he's facing the cylons, so he goes full luddite.
The net profit of America putting the European competitors out of business far exceeds the cost of the program, over the 50 year time frame.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: F35 vs. A10?

Post by Speaker to Animals » Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:18 pm

Image

Rare photograph of Smitty explaining to Capps how oobla loops are king, and the only thing you need to avoid a surface-to-air missile is a high angle of attack.

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: F35 vs. A10?

Post by StCapps » Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:20 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:15 pm
I have been laughing my ass off at your ignorance. Both of your. Especially Smitty. This shit has been shared. It's fucking hilarious!
That isn't a compelling argument. We have made ours, all you do is laugh at us, repeat Winslow Wheeler talking points with no good counter-argument. That isn't winning dude, that's clearly losing.
*yip*

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: F35 vs. A10?

Post by Smitty-48 » Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:22 pm

Iron Eagle is awesome. Charles 'Chappy' Sinclair did nothing wrong.



Iron Eagle is real. Stealth, EODAS, Sensor Fusion; F-16 on steroids does it all, no need for F-15.
Last edited by Smitty-48 on Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: F35 vs. A10?

Post by Speaker to Animals » Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:27 pm

Of course he thinks Iron Eagle was even remotely accurate. LMFAO

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: F35 vs. A10?

Post by Smitty-48 » Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:28 pm

The propaganda is accurate, Iron Eagle is real, a tactical interdiction fighter which can do it all.

In 1986, was a futuristic idea, now it is in service.
Nec Aspera Terrent