No, she really can't defeat Trump in the general election, the DNC won't have to stop her, she doesn't have what it takes to win, whether they backed her or not. Political lightweight is obvious, just because you like her does not mean that Americans would vote for her.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 1:01 pmTulsi Gabbard could defeat Trump in a general election. Not that the DNC will allow her to get that far. Just saying. She'd certainly beat Trump.
THE ERA OF TRUMP
-
StCapps
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Last edited by StCapps on Mon Mar 04, 2019 1:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
Zlaxer
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Want to put some DCF bucks (or some other wager) behind that claim?StCapps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 12:59 pmTrump is offering plenty of gibs himself, and far left bullshit only flies in big cities dude, Trump is going to crush the Democrats in 2020.Zlaxer wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 12:55 pmNo - American proles will go to the polls and vote for GIBS - just like they always do. Shanquia doesn't care about federal government fiscal sustainability or the systematic extermination of Western Culture. Shanquia just want her Obama phone and government housing and healthcare and reparations.
-
StCapps
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
As may as you want. Easiest wager ever.Zlaxer wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 1:06 pmWant to put some DCF bucks (or some other wager) behind that claim?StCapps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 12:59 pmTrump is offering plenty of gibs himself, and far left bullshit only flies in big cities dude, Trump is going to crush the Democrats in 2020.Zlaxer wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 12:55 pm
No - American proles will go to the polls and vote for GIBS - just like they always do. Shanquia doesn't care about federal government fiscal sustainability or the systematic extermination of Western Culture. Shanquia just want her Obama phone and government housing and healthcare and reparations.
At worst Trump will coast to victory, at best Trump will win in a landslide.
Last edited by StCapps on Mon Mar 04, 2019 1:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Trump was a political lightweight.StCapps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 1:04 pmNo, she really can't defeat Trump in the general election, the DNC won't have to stop her, she doesn't have what it takes to win, whether they backed her or not. Political lightweight is obvious, just because you like her does not mean that Americans would vote for her.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 1:01 pmTulsi Gabbard could defeat Trump in a general election. Not that the DNC will allow her to get that far. Just saying. She'd certainly beat Trump.
-
StCapps
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Trump has far more natural political talent than Gabbard, by a long shot. Gabbard is like a lesser Ron Paul, she has no fucking chance, all she has is a fringe following within her own party. Whether the media back her or not, won't make the slightest bit of difference, that shit doesn't win elections in America, period. Rand Paul had a better chance of beating Trump than Tulsi Gabbard has of beating Trump, and the dude got fucking steamrolled, Trump lite isn't gonna beat Trump.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 1:07 pmTrump was a political lightweight.StCapps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 1:04 pmNo, she really can't defeat Trump in the general election, the DNC won't have to stop her, she doesn't have what it takes to win, whether they backed her or not. Political lightweight is obvious, just because you like her does not mean that Americans would vote for her.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 1:01 pmTulsi Gabbard could defeat Trump in a general election. Not that the DNC will allow her to get that far. Just saying. She'd certainly beat Trump.
You might want to turn on Trump and vote Gabbard because Trump hasn't gone far enough on immigration for your liking, but projecting that attitude on the rest of America, leads to some silly wishful thinking political analysis on your part.
Last edited by StCapps on Mon Mar 04, 2019 1:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Not really. Trump is a terrible politician in every respect.
Where he shined was playing the media like a fiddle.
Where he shined was playing the media like a fiddle.
-
StCapps
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Which Gabbard cannot do, she has no fucking chance. Some people being mad at Trump over immigration isn't enough to give Gabbard a chance in hell against Trump, stop projecting on the electorate. Your view of Trump, is not the electorates view of Trump, quit pretending otherwise with your wishful thinking nonsense.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 1:12 pmWhere he shined was playing the media like a fiddle.
*yip*
-
Smitty-48
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
How does Gabbard even become the candidate?
The Bernie Bros are going to vote for her?
She seems too right wing to win the nom in this Democrat coalition.
The Bernie Bros are going to vote for her?
She seems too right wing to win the nom in this Democrat coalition.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
If Gabbard by the grace of God made it to the general election campaign, she'd defeat Trump.
-
Zlaxer
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
If The Hair God Emperor doesn't win by a 10pt margin, you have to make a post stating the Bruins are the most awesomeness team ever and that all Canadian teams are just hosers
