Spoiler Alert: The federal government is not the solution to this problem, kiddos. Consider all of your legislative and regulatory plans for today in the hands of Elizabeth Warren or the equivalent tomorrow.
LOL
Shekel cucks gonna cuck.
The rest of us see the problem. We are maybe a few years from being silenced online without some kind of regulations and you faggots are going to bitch and complain that we won't let liberals kick you offline. Fucking ridiculous.
Spoiler Alert: The federal government is not the solution to this problem, kiddos. Consider all of your legislative and regulatory plans for today in the hands of Elizabeth Warren or the equivalent tomorrow.
LOL
Shekel cucks gonna cuck.
The rest of us see the problem. We are maybe a few years from being silenced online without some kind of regulations and you faggots are going to bitch and complain that we won't let liberals kick you offline. Fucking ridiculous.
They already were and are. Net neutrality ain't stopping that, it will enshrine it.
Spoiler Alert: The federal government is not the solution to this problem, kiddos. Consider all of your legislative and regulatory plans for today in the hands of Elizabeth Warren or the equivalent tomorrow.
LOL
Shekel cucks gonna cuck.
The rest of us see the problem. We are maybe a few years from being silenced online without some kind of regulations and you faggots are going to bitch and complain that we won't let liberals kick you offline. Fucking ridiculous.
They already were and are. Net neutrality ain't stopping that, it will enshrine it.
This isn't about net neutrality. Don't muddy the waters.
This is about social media as a replacement for the lying MSM. If the liberals cannot continue to act as gatekeepers to public discourse, they will eventually lose. So they will do everything possible to shut us out.
Fife gave us yet another glaring example of how fucked up this is, and then followed it with his magic unicorn dust statement that somehow the market will solve it. Yet I think I have better odds waiting for Long Island to go underwater from global warming than his Mammon-worshiping ideology somehow magically solving the problem of liberal corporations shutting us out of public discourse.
The rest of us see the problem. We are maybe a few years from being silenced online without some kind of regulations and you faggots are going to bitch and complain that we won't let liberals kick you offline. Fucking ridiculous.
They already were and are. Net neutrality ain't stopping that, it will enshrine it.
This isn't about net neutrality. Don't muddy the waters.
This is about social media as a replacement for the lying MSM. If the liberals cannot continue to act as gatekeepers to public discourse, they will eventually lose. So they will do everything possible to shut us out.
Fife gave us yet another glaring example of how fucked up this is, and then followed it with his magic unicorn dust statement that somehow the market will solve it. Yet I think I have better odds waiting for Long Island to go underwater from global warming than his Mammon-worshiping ideology somehow magically solving the problem of liberal corporations shutting us out of public discourse.
"Liberals are going to lose if we get rid of gate keepers."
For sure.
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
Postby Speaker to Animals » Wed Feb 27, 2019 7:37 am
The problem is that the typical conservative doesn't really understand what the fuck is going on or how shit actually works now or historically. The rise of democracy is a product of the rise of mass media. Whoever controls the mass media controls the dumbass demos and therefore the outcomes of elections. The advent of ubiquitous social media acted as a disruptive technology towards the neoliberal control of public discourse in the form of "gate-keeping". But fortunately for them the companies that control most of the platforms upon which free speech was being used against neo-liberalism are doing everything possible to regain control.
The actual war of democracy (and democracy really is a kind of war from beginning to its final end) is a war over the demos. It's a war of sophistry versus truth. Here you had sophistry advancing this narrative that racist Catholic boys were accosting this Vietnam veteran tribal elder as he journeyed on his meth vision quest. But Shipley demolished part of that narrative and helped undo it. His research into this AWOL refer mechanic is now a pivotal piece of evidence in some very expensive lawsuits the MSM is likely to lose. Of course they wanted this guy shut down so this never happens again.
There is no remedy for this in the so-called "free market". There is no free market. There has never been a free market. There never will be a free market. Free markets are the global warming of the shekel cucks.
"Any day now the free market will magically fix the problem of corporate censorship"
"Any day now global warming will leave Long Island completely submerged in the ocean"
The problem is that the typical conservative doesn't really understand what the fuck is going on or how shit actually works now or historically. The rise of democracy is a product of the rise of mass media. Whoever controls the mass media controls the dumbass demos and therefore the outcomes of elections. The advent of ubiquitous social media acted as a disruptive technology towards the neoliberal control of public discourse in the form of "gate-keeping". But fortunately for them the companies that control most of the platforms upon which free speech was being used against neo-liberalism are doing everything possible to regain control.
The actual war of democracy (and democracy really is a kind of war from beginning to its final end) is a war over the demos. It's a war of sophistry versus truth. Here you had sophistry advancing this narrative that racist Catholic boys were accosting this Vietnam veteran tribal elder as he journeyed on his meth vision quest. But Shipley demolished part of that narrative and helped undo it. His research into this AWOL refer mechanic is now a pivotal piece of evidence in some very expensive lawsuits the MSM is likely to lose. Of course they wanted this guy shut down so this never happens again.
There is no remedy for this in the so-called "free market". There is no free market. There has never been a free market. There never will be a free market. Free markets are the global warming of the shekel cucks.
"Any day now the free market will magically fix the problem of corporate censorship"
"Any day now global warming will leave Long Island completely submerged in the ocean"
The problem is that the typical conservative doesn't really understand what the fuck is going on or how shit actually works now or historically. The rise of democracy is a product of the rise of mass media. Whoever controls the mass media controls the dumbass demos and therefore the outcomes of elections. The advent of ubiquitous social media acted as a disruptive technology towards the neoliberal control of public discourse in the form of "gate-keeping". But fortunately for them the companies that control most of the platforms upon which free speech was being used against neo-liberalism are doing everything possible to regain control.
The actual war of democracy (and democracy really is a kind of war from beginning to its final end) is a war over the demos. It's a war of sophistry versus truth. Here you had sophistry advancing this narrative that racist Catholic boys were accosting this Vietnam veteran tribal elder as he journeyed on his meth vision quest. But Shipley demolished part of that narrative and helped undo it. His research into this AWOL refer mechanic is now a pivotal piece of evidence in some very expensive lawsuits the MSM is likely to lose. Of course they wanted this guy shut down so this never happens again.
There is no remedy for this in the so-called "free market". There is no free market. There has never been a free market. There never will be a free market. Free markets are the global warming of the shekel cucks.
"Any day now the free market will magically fix the problem of corporate censorship"
"Any day now global warming will leave Long Island completely submerged in the ocean"
Any day now..
"Lois Lerner will keep our internet free."
You are trying to muddy the waters. This has nothing to do with net neutrality. Net neutrality is an issue with the Internet backbone and the Internet providers. This is about social media.
The problem is that the typical conservative doesn't really understand what the fuck is going on or how shit actually works now or historically. The rise of democracy is a product of the rise of mass media. Whoever controls the mass media controls the dumbass demos and therefore the outcomes of elections. The advent of ubiquitous social media acted as a disruptive technology towards the neoliberal control of public discourse in the form of "gate-keeping". But fortunately for them the companies that control most of the platforms upon which free speech was being used against neo-liberalism are doing everything possible to regain control.
The actual war of democracy (and democracy really is a kind of war from beginning to its final end) is a war over the demos. It's a war of sophistry versus truth. Here you had sophistry advancing this narrative that racist Catholic boys were accosting this Vietnam veteran tribal elder as he journeyed on his meth vision quest. But Shipley demolished part of that narrative and helped undo it. His research into this AWOL refer mechanic is now a pivotal piece of evidence in some very expensive lawsuits the MSM is likely to lose. Of course they wanted this guy shut down so this never happens again.
There is no remedy for this in the so-called "free market". There is no free market. There has never been a free market. There never will be a free market. Free markets are the global warming of the shekel cucks.
"Any day now the free market will magically fix the problem of corporate censorship"
"Any day now global warming will leave Long Island completely submerged in the ocean"
Any day now..
"Lois Lerner will keep our internet free."
You are trying to muddy the waters. This has nothing to do with net neutrality. Net neutrality is an issue with the Internet backbone and the Internet providers. This is about social media.
You are trying to muddy the waters. This has nothing to do with net neutrality. Net neutrality is an issue with the Internet backbone and the Internet providers. This is about social media.
When can I expect Mammon to correct this problem?
Who do you think will run social media?
What does that have to do with anything? If the power company started shutting us off from electricity because they don't like our political views, and somebody said we should probably have regulations against that kind of destructive behavior, would you reply "who do you think will run the utilities?"
From a legal standpoint, you could possibly go after the social media companies claim that they are common carriers when they don't want to be held responsible for content. If they are going to be a newspaper-model instead of a library-model, then they are culpable for what they allow on their networks. This means Facebook should be held accountable for hosting terror groups like the one that radicalized the mass shooter who tried to assassinate republicans in a baseball game.
If they are like a newspaper, then they should come right out and admit it, and then open themselves up to all the inevitable prosecutions for hosting violent content.