That makes no sense. He had all of France and most of central Europe to mid Poland. That's plenty of breadbasket without taking on the USSR.TheReal_ND wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 3:30 pm Hitler explains the motivation for it in Mein Kampf, (frankly amazing everyone acts all clueless about it.)
When WWI ended after the Germans signed the armistrice Hitler noted how England didn't quit blockading Germany which caused over 100k of his countrymen to starve. Hitler wrote about this in his diary. He said he never wanted it to happen again which is why he gunned for Ukraine.
Cool Hobbies/Interests/Whatever
-
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm
Re: Cool Hobbies/Interests/Whatever
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND
-
- Posts: 26048
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Cool Hobbies/Interests/Whatever
On the face of it no. Germany didn't have the fertile land mass to support it's population and neither did France or England. They still don't and never will. Europe has never been a bread basket.brewster wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 3:44 pmThat makes no sense. He had all of France and most of central Europe to mid Poland. That's plenty of breadbasket without taking on the USSR.TheReal_ND wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 3:30 pm Hitler explains the motivation for it in Mein Kampf, (frankly amazing everyone acts all clueless about it.)
When WWI ended after the Germans signed the armistrice Hitler noted how England didn't quit blockading Germany which caused over 100k of his countrymen to starve. Hitler wrote about this in his diary. He said he never wanted it to happen again which is why he gunned for Ukraine.
-
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Cool Hobbies/Interests/Whatever
It may be a lot of farmland but it is also a lot of mouths to feed.brewster wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 3:44 pmThat makes no sense. He had all of France and most of central Europe to mid Poland. That's plenty of breadbasket without taking on the USSR.TheReal_ND wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 3:30 pm Hitler explains the motivation for it in Mein Kampf, (frankly amazing everyone acts all clueless about it.)
When WWI ended after the Germans signed the armistrice Hitler noted how England didn't quit blockading Germany which caused over 100k of his countrymen to starve. Hitler wrote about this in his diary. He said he never wanted it to happen again which is why he gunned for Ukraine.
Ukraine had the land but with a population of ''subhumans'' that he was happy to work and starve to death.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.


-
- Posts: 26048
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Cool Hobbies/Interests/Whatever
Ukraine propped up the Soviet Union in the face of starvation. Ukraine is kind of a big deal.
-
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Cool Hobbies/Interests/Whatever
France does have the capacity to feed itself, it is a net exporter of food.TheReal_ND wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 3:49 pmOn the face of it no. Germany didn't have the fertile land mass to support it's population and neither did France or England. They still don't and never will. Europe has never been a bread basket.brewster wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 3:44 pmThat makes no sense. He had all of France and most of central Europe to mid Poland. That's plenty of breadbasket without taking on the USSR.TheReal_ND wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 3:30 pm Hitler explains the motivation for it in Mein Kampf, (frankly amazing everyone acts all clueless about it.)
When WWI ended after the Germans signed the armistrice Hitler noted how England didn't quit blockading Germany which caused over 100k of his countrymen to starve. Hitler wrote about this in his diary. He said he never wanted it to happen again which is why he gunned for Ukraine.
England never was but Germany was never really close to conquering the British Isles and taking our land anyway.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.


-
- Posts: 26048
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Cool Hobbies/Interests/Whatever
I disagree. Maybe France has improved their centralization of food production since then but the revolution kicked off after years of drought and famine.Montegriffo wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 3:56 pmFrance does have the capacity to feed itself, it is a net exporter of food.TheReal_ND wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 3:49 pmOn the face of it no. Germany didn't have the fertile land mass to support it's population and neither did France or England. They still don't and never will. Europe has never been a bread basket.brewster wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 3:44 pm
That makes no sense. He had all of France and most of central Europe to mid Poland. That's plenty of breadbasket without taking on the USSR.
England never was but Germany was never really close to conquering the British Isles and taking our land anyway.
I think Western Europeans are not able to produce the food needed to sustain their population. Not then, not now, not ever.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Cool Hobbies/Interests/Whatever
You can produce food pretty much anywhere using greenhouses. It's just a technological problem. The economic side of the problem is that the food is going to be more expensive that way.
-
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm
Re: Cool Hobbies/Interests/Whatever
That raises an interesting question I've never heard addressed: Did Germany redirect Dutch & French agriculture to their own needs during the Occupation? Less brie, veal and wine and more wheat, potatoes and sausage? And why was genocide off limits for non-Jewish Western Europeans? They killed quite a few anyway.Montegriffo wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 3:51 pm It may be a lot of farmland but it is also a lot of mouths to feed.
Ukraine had the land but with a population of ''subhumans'' that he was happy to work and starve to death.
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND
-
- Posts: 26048
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Cool Hobbies/Interests/Whatever
No, Germany was not interested in persecuting their cousins. They weren't in the business of being tyrannical dictators.brewster wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:08 pmThat raises an interesting question I've never heard addressed: Did Germany redirect Dutch & French agriculture to their own needs during the Occupation? Less brie, veal and wine and more wheat, potatoes and sausage? And why was genocide off limits for non-Jewish Western Europeans? They killed quite a few anyway.Montegriffo wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 3:51 pm It may be a lot of farmland but it is also a lot of mouths to feed.
Ukraine had the land but with a population of ''subhumans'' that he was happy to work and starve to death.
-
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm
Re: Cool Hobbies/Interests/Whatever
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!TheReal_ND wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:11 pm No, Germany was not interested in persecuting their cousins. They weren't in the business of being tyrannical dictators.
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND