At least you admit it.DBTrek wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 11:34 amI’m lumping you in with Brewster and Monte.
That’s where.
A better question for all three of you would be “Where did I say I was proving the existence of God”?
I’d never tackle the fool’s errand of claiming to prove or disprove God. Especially when I can tackle the infinitely simpler task of proving that you guys don’t have the knowledge you think you do.
Let us talk about religion, but not in the way you think.
-
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:00 am
Re: Let us talk about religion, but not in the way you think.
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Let us talk about religion, but not in the way you think.
I like to set a good example for the kids.
Learn from my humility, scrub.
Learn from my humility, scrub.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Let us talk about religion, but not in the way you think.
Why are y'all hatin' on memes now?
...after all, that's how your hair God got elected.
...after all, that's how your hair God got elected.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Re: Let us talk about religion, but not in the way you think.
Deep, deep down in the deepest layers of hell we all shall be consigned to sit with laptops nailed to our laps, debating in an eternal "Atheism is not a belief system" thread.
(Anyway...cliff notes on the OP vid, pls?)
(Anyway...cliff notes on the OP vid, pls?)
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Let us talk about religion, but not in the way you think.
It is precisely based on known facts.brewster wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 11:25 amThat is a statement without basis in any known facts. You are inserting your suppositions into the lack of facts. Your God could be Asimov's hyperspace supercomputer in "The Last Question".Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Fri Jan 11, 2019 11:23 amWhatever caused the Big Bang is outside time and space. It's not a thing. It's eternal.
-
- Posts: 2443
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:10 am
-
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:00 am
Re: Let us talk about religion, but not in the way you think.
It's from the author of "Eat, Pray, love" on how she believes that genius is an external spirit that comes to us, same as the muse.
She also takes issue with the fact that artists are seen as "doomed" and fights the narrative of the only truth path of artistry is this unhealthy self-destruction that leads ultimately to death, which has been the case for many of our greatest artists. Says this started post-enlightenment when we started seeing the muse as individual rather than spiritual. States that the ancients believed the muse to be a connection with the divine and something to be celebrated, instead of art being something one suffers.
It's a good watch.
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Let us talk about religion, but not in the way you think.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:00 am
Re: Let us talk about religion, but not in the way you think.
What if heaven and hell were the same place?
(Stole that idea from someone)
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson