Montegriffo wrote: Wed Jan 09, 2019 7:49 am
Wow.
Making it harder for children to watch hardcore porn is prudish?
Is that the Pope's opinion too or do the Priests say children should be in porn not watching it?
It's not the government's role to make porn more difficult for children to watch. That's the role of parents.
Not the government's job to make laws against children drinking alcohol or driving cars. It is the sole responsibility of parents.
Derp
Not the government's job to make laws against children drinking alcohol or driving cars. It is the sole responsibility of parents.
Good point.
What if the parents are paedophiles or just terrible parents?
Fucking unbelievable that you all object to measures intended to make it harder for children to view porn.
What about hardcore gay porn? Should that be easy for pubescent children to watch too?
Over hyped unfortunately. I watched about half of it but found it a little tedious. No real insights into the process.
I might try again sometime but apart from some good acting from Benedict nothing much to recommend it for.
There's certainly enough voters to be statistically accurate. "Mobilizing more voters" isn't going to change anything unless the "mobilized voters" are unrepresentative of the population; how democratic is that?!