THE ERA OF TRUMP
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
"The experiment requires that you continue."
:goteam: :drunk:
:goteam: :drunk:
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Man those two are creepy AF. They looked like wind up zombies.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Come and play with us Danny. Forever. And ever and ever.
Walking talking nightmares.
Walking talking nightmares.
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Looks like it's noon in NashVegas :go team drunk:
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
There's no Vegas like Ashevegas.
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Ed Buck, OD's another one of his man whores
The second prostitute to die in Ed Bucks home.
The second prostitute to die in Ed Bucks home.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
What's it called when you do the opposite? That is, dismiss a report without checking the data or the methodology.DBTrek wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 9:35 amBest scenario case, that’s what they do. But you’ve neither checked the data, nor the methodology, so what you’re really voicing here is a hope rather than a fact.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 2:28 am
What they do is analyse all the available data and extrapolate that to predict the most likely conclusion.
And the problem remains that whether they’ve done due diligence in their predictive research or not, clowns like you will simply see the word “professor” and accept whatever they say as the unquestionable truth. You’re like the Milgram experiment personified.
That would be just as bad, wouldn't it?
It's like the carbon footprint labelling argument all over again, you dismissed that with no knowledge of the data or methodology applied.
Raise the double standard DB.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
You mean the carbon footprint debate where you were forced to acknowledge that the scheme relied on either bureaucrats or businesses inventing a carbon footprint number for goods that would be leveraged to manipulate markets Willy-nilku? The carbon footprint scheme that overlooked transportation costs, environmental factors, and dynamic inputs that would surely change the footprint value of it were to be *actually* measured instead of invented?Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:43 am
What's it called when you do the opposite? That is, dismiss a report without checking the data or the methodology.
That would be just as bad, wouldn't it?
It's like the carbon footprint labelling argument all over again, you dismissed that with no knowledge of the data or methodology applied.
Raise the double standard DB.
Or perhaps I should simply say - that *other* debate where you deferred entirely to false authority and checked your mind out from the get-go.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Too early to tell. If Democrats get the POTUS and the Senate I bet they will get at least some of their agenda through. Better than the GOP does when they have full control. Like I said, Democrats get their politicians to fall in line much better than Republicans.
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
It's that kind of can do attitude that has you Brits fleeing for cover every time you see a drone.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:48 am'Cos shooting firearms in densely populated areas can have no possible unintended consequences.