Brexit

[SuburbanFarmer]

No masturbation without permission, you degenerates.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01- ... l-go-ahead

All requests will be properly catalogued, before we leak your credit cards all over the internet.

[Speaker to Animals]

Inshallah

[Ph64]

No masturbation without permission, you degenerates.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01- ... l-go-ahead

All requests will be properly catalogued, before we leak your credit cards all over the internet.

Oi, you wankin' off in there, you got proof you're old enough to wank?

[Speaker to Animals]

They have to buy a TV license so it makes sense they also should buy permission to watch porn.

[Montegriffo]

Wrong thread but if you insist...
At what age do you think children should be able to view internet porn?
UK law says you can't buy porn until you are 18.
Maybe you think that is ageist and there should be no limit?

[Montegriffo]

They have to buy a TV license so it makes sense they also should buy permission to watch porn.

Only if you want to watch BBC programs. Everything else can be watched online perfectly legally without paying a license fee.

Also, you don't have to pay to watch online porn. The proposal is that you have to use a credit card to verify your age. No payments are to be made.

[SuburbanFarmer]

They have to buy a TV license so it makes sense they also should buy permission to watch porn.

Only if you want to watch BBC programs. Everything else can be watched online perfectly legally without paying a license fee.

Also, you don't have to pay to watch online porn. The proposal is that you have to use a credit card to verify your age. No payments are to be made.

"Age verification services". Is that to be subsidized by the taxpayers, or paid by them directly?

[Montegriffo]

They have to buy a TV license so it makes sense they also should buy permission to watch porn.

Only if you want to watch BBC programs. Everything else can be watched online perfectly legally without paying a license fee.

Also, you don't have to pay to watch online porn. The proposal is that you have to use a credit card to verify your age. No payments are to be made.

"Age verification services". Is that to be subsidized by the taxpayers, or paid by them directly?

No charge to anyone.
Not giving my credit card details to any dodgy porn site though. I guess the main effect is going to be that the well known ''reputable'' sites will get the most visits.
How are you reassured that your children aren't going to be watching double fistings when they go to bed?

[Ph64]

Only if you want to watch BBC programs. Everything else can be watched online perfectly legally without paying a license fee.

Also, you don't have to pay to watch online porn. The proposal is that you have to use a credit card to verify your age. No payments are to be made.

"Age verification services". Is that to be subsidized by the taxpayers, or paid by them directly?

No charge to anyone.
Not giving my credit card details to any dodgy porn site though. I guess the main effect is going to be that the well known ''reputable'' sites will get the most visits.
How are you reassured that your children aren't going to be watching double fistings when they go to bed?

Well, here's my questions - how many people under the age of 18 pay tv licenses?
I'm guessing that's probably a very small number, their parent(s) probably pay.

Given that, why is it the state's responsibility to control what the parents choose to let their children watch? Sure, the BBC can sell/rent "child safety" boxes those who maybe don't have tv's with that type of functionality built in - again, it being the parent(s) choice... why is the "Nanny state" involved at all?

[Montegriffo]

"Age verification services". Is that to be subsidized by the taxpayers, or paid by them directly?

No charge to anyone.
Not giving my credit card details to any dodgy porn site though. I guess the main effect is going to be that the well known ''reputable'' sites will get the most visits.
How are you reassured that your children aren't going to be watching double fistings when they go to bed?

Well, here's my questions - how many people under the age of 18 pay tv licenses?
I'm guessing that's probably a very small number, their parent(s) probably pay.

Given that, why is it the state's responsibility to control what the parents choose to let their children watch? Sure, the BBC can sell/rent "child safety" boxes those who maybe don't have tv's with that type of functionality built in - again, it being the parent(s) choice... why is the "Nanny state" involved at all?

What?
Are you seriously asking why the nanny state is trying to make it more difficult to watch porn on the BBC?
Porn is not available on British TV, this proposal is to protect children from online porn.

Why do you think porn sites shouldn't be made to put in measures to restrict double fisting videos to adults?

I can't believe I am being asked to justify this.