-
Ph64
- Posts: 2434
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm
Post
by Ph64 » Wed Dec 26, 2018 2:01 am
The Conservative wrote: ↑Sun Dec 16, 2018 8:38 am
Fife wrote: ↑Sat Dec 15, 2018 8:48 am
Some of you dazzling young urbanites would probably learn a lot by visiting the child support docket one morning and getting a load of the proceedings.
If I wasn't in the picture, my wife would have more support than even a good paying job could offer her... which really is sad.
Imagine that DNA test you got for Christmas and how it could change your life...
https://www.bbc.com/news/stories-46600325
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Wed Dec 26, 2018 4:10 am
A DNA test should be mandatory before a man is enslaved with child support and, if he is not the father, the woman should face criminal prosecution.
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Wed Dec 26, 2018 9:57 am
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Dec 26, 2018 4:10 am
A DNA test should be mandatory before a man is enslaved with child support and, if he is not the father, the woman should face criminal prosecution.
It’s not?
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Wed Dec 26, 2018 10:26 am
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Wed Dec 26, 2018 9:57 am
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Dec 26, 2018 4:10 am
A DNA test should be mandatory before a man is enslaved with child support and, if he is not the father, the woman should face criminal prosecution.
It’s not?
Nope. Not only that, the state really doesn't give a shit. There are men who showed DNA test results that prove the bitch lied and they are not the father, and the state still enslaves them. Worse, some places are making it illegal for men to DNA test the children.
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Wed Dec 26, 2018 11:47 am
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Dec 26, 2018 10:26 am
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Wed Dec 26, 2018 9:57 am
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Dec 26, 2018 4:10 am
A DNA test should be mandatory before a man is enslaved with child support and, if he is not the father, the woman should face criminal prosecution.
It’s not?
Nope. Not only that, the state really doesn't give a shit. There are men who showed DNA test results that prove the bitch lied and they are not the father, and the state still enslaves them. Worse, some places are making it illegal for men to DNA test the children.
Beautiful.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Wed Dec 26, 2018 11:55 am
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Wed Dec 26, 2018 11:47 am
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Dec 26, 2018 10:26 am
Nope. Not only that, the state really doesn't give a shit. There are men who showed DNA test results that prove the bitch lied and they are not the father, and the state still enslaves them. Worse, some places are making it illegal for men to DNA test the children.
Beautiful.
Something to remember when women try to snow you about "gender equality" and how they deserve the special right to enslave men, because men need to be "responsible for their offspring". They don't give a shit about gender equality or what is best for the children.
-
Fife
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Post
by Fife » Wed Dec 26, 2018 12:06 pm
There is a big difference in a paternity determination in divorce cases and juvenile court (non-marital) cases regarding child support/custody/&c.
Regarding burden of proof on paternity, it is presumed that a legal husband is the father of children born to his legal wife. The presumption can be rebutted, but the burden is on the party denying paternity.
Your marriage contract with the state via license is taken very seriously by the state.
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Post
by The Conservative » Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:23 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Wed Dec 26, 2018 9:57 am
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Dec 26, 2018 4:10 am
A DNA test should be mandatory before a man is enslaved with child support and, if he is not the father, the woman should face criminal prosecution.
It’s not?
Lol, nope...
#NotOneRedCent
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Wed Dec 26, 2018 3:56 pm
Fife wrote: ↑Wed Dec 26, 2018 12:06 pm
There is a big difference in a paternity determination in divorce cases and juvenile court (non-marital) cases regarding child support/custody/&c.
Regarding burden of proof on paternity, it is presumed that a legal husband is the father of children born to his legal wife. The presumption can be rebutted, but the burden is on the party denying paternity.
Your marriage contract with the state via license is taken very seriously by the state.
Yet another reason not to enter into slavery- err, marriage.
-
Ph64
- Posts: 2434
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm
Post
by Ph64 » Thu Dec 27, 2018 1:04 am
https://www.thestar.com/life/advice/201 ... ellie.html
Not to worry, she'll get state aid after the divorce, plus half his shit and maybe half his paycheck for the next 18 years. Losing him and the crap she'll get from her family about it, well, maybe she should have thought about that before fucking a bunch of men behind his back.