Pro Iraq war, pro Libya destabilization, Wall Street Semen Swallower, doesn't care about first, second, or fourth amendment and is open about this fact, took hundreds of thousands of dollars for speaking events at Goldman Sachs displaying open contempt for average Americans, values the wellbeing of illegals over the wellbeing of conservative caucasian Christian Americans etc. She is clearly the worse and worst choice by a country mile. You could get an olympic gold medal for all the mental gymnastics you'd have to perform to view otherwise.MilSpecs wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 1:08 pmThey both suck. Your point is? Are we supposed to be content choosing between horrible and horrible?heydaralon wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 12:30 pmHillary Clinton was the better choice. She has no desire to use her office to enrich herself. Many honest people run for public office and stay in it for decades and make hundreds of millions of dollars. That is perfectly reasonable. That's who I want in the White House.
Connecticut
-
- Posts: 7571
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm
Re: Connecticut
Shikata ga nai
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Connecticut
Clearly you prefer the actual mob associate. There's a sucker born every minute....heydaralon wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 5:49 pmPro Iraq war, pro Libya destabilization, Wall Street Semen Swallower, doesn't care about first, second, or fourth amendment and is open about this fact, took hundreds of thousands of dollars for speaking events at Goldman Sachs displaying open contempt for average Americans, values the wellbeing of illegals over the wellbeing of conservative caucasian Christian Americans etc. She is clearly the worse and worst choice by a country mile. You could get an olympic gold medal for all the mental gymnastics you'd have to perform to view otherwise.MilSpecs wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 1:08 pmThey both suck. Your point is? Are we supposed to be content choosing between horrible and horrible?heydaralon wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 12:30 pmHillary Clinton was the better choice. She has no desire to use her office to enrich herself. Many honest people run for public office and stay in it for decades and make hundreds of millions of dollars. That is perfectly reasonable. That's who I want in the White House.
-
- Posts: 7571
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm
Re: Connecticut
mob associate? lol. Pick a despotic govt. They have all donated to the Clinton foundation, including Russia in the pay for play system. Its also possible that Bill Clinton straight up took money from the Chinese Govt in the 90's. There is at least as much, if not more evidence, for that then this Trump Russia nonsense. You don't like Trump because he has made boorish women comments, and you would prefer a corrupt money grubbing public trough drinking social justice moron with decades of catastrophic failures for policies, coverups, and civil liberties destroying initiatives. From where I'm sitting, you'd have to be to so much of a sucker to vote for Hillary after looking at her track record, that they would stick you to the inside wall of an fishtank to get the algae off.MilSpecs wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 5:59 pmClearly you prefer the actual mob associate. There's a sucker born every minute....heydaralon wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 5:49 pmPro Iraq war, pro Libya destabilization, Wall Street Semen Swallower, doesn't care about first, second, or fourth amendment and is open about this fact, took hundreds of thousands of dollars for speaking events at Goldman Sachs displaying open contempt for average Americans, values the wellbeing of illegals over the wellbeing of conservative caucasian Christian Americans etc. She is clearly the worse and worst choice by a country mile. You could get an olympic gold medal for all the mental gymnastics you'd have to perform to view otherwise.
Shikata ga nai
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Connecticut
The KKK was a minority... you know what, if you can't use the 5 lbs of gray matter between your ears, I can't help you...Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 3:09 pmThat doesn't really answer the question. Was it too hard for you?The Conservative wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 2:30 pmWhy do you even attempt to sugarcoat shit? Seriously, we see it's shit, we can smell the shit, we can tell by touching it that it's shit... we are not going to eat the fucking stuff just because you think sugar coating it is going to make it taste better going down.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 11:38 amWhy do people think a tiny minority of Communists are a threat to the US but the far right is exaggerated and no real danger?
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Connecticut
Why do you keep making your argument Trump vs. Clinton? Trump is president. I didn't vote for either, not being a fan of criminals. Trump is a known deadbeat, swindler, and mob associate. Being a boor is at the bottom of the list of reasons why I don't like him.heydaralon wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 6:09 pmmob associate? lol. Pick a despotic govt. They have all donated to the Clinton foundation, including Russia in the pay for play system. Its also possible that Bill Clinton straight up took money from the Chinese Govt in the 90's. There is at least as much, if not more evidence, for that then this Trump Russia nonsense. You don't like Trump because he has made boorish women comments, and you would prefer a corrupt money grubbing public trough drinking social justice moron with decades of catastrophic failures for policies, coverups, and civil liberties destroying initiatives. From where I'm sitting, you'd have to be to so much of a sucker to vote for Hillary after looking at her track record, that they would stick you to the inside wall of an fishtank to get the algae off.MilSpecs wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 5:59 pmClearly you prefer the actual mob associate. There's a sucker born every minute....heydaralon wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 5:49 pm
Pro Iraq war, pro Libya destabilization, Wall Street Semen Swallower, doesn't care about first, second, or fourth amendment and is open about this fact, took hundreds of thousands of dollars for speaking events at Goldman Sachs displaying open contempt for average Americans, values the wellbeing of illegals over the wellbeing of conservative caucasian Christian Americans etc. She is clearly the worse and worst choice by a country mile. You could get an olympic gold medal for all the mental gymnastics you'd have to perform to view otherwise.
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Connecticut
All True.MilSpecs wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 7:08 pm
Why do you keep making your argument Trump vs. Clinton? Trump is president. I didn't vote for either, not being a fan of criminals. Trump is a known deadbeat, swindler, and mob associate. Being a boor is at the bottom of the list of reasons why I don't like him.
But it still puts him well ahead of the Washington DC crowd, and about the only one looking out for interests of the average American.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Connecticut
He's spent much of his adult life ripping off average Americans. He could care less about their interests unless they align with his.C-Mag wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 7:50 pmAll True.MilSpecs wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 7:08 pm
Why do you keep making your argument Trump vs. Clinton? Trump is president. I didn't vote for either, not being a fan of criminals. Trump is a known deadbeat, swindler, and mob associate. Being a boor is at the bottom of the list of reasons why I don't like him.
But it still puts him well ahead of the Washington DC crowd, and about the only one looking out for interests of the average American.
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Connecticut
He's the only POTUS in history that is worth less after attaining the office than before. He largely self funded his campaign and takes no pay for his service.MilSpecs wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 8:17 pmHe's spent much of his adult life ripping off average Americans. He could care less about their interests unless they align with his.C-Mag wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 7:50 pmAll True.MilSpecs wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 7:08 pm
Why do you keep making your argument Trump vs. Clinton? Trump is president. I didn't vote for either, not being a fan of criminals. Trump is a known deadbeat, swindler, and mob associate. Being a boor is at the bottom of the list of reasons why I don't like him.
But it still puts him well ahead of the Washington DC crowd, and about the only one looking out for interests of the average American.
Let's look at Obama, the basically never had a job prior to becoming POTUS, never had any money to speak of, but left office worth $ 80 Million Dollars...……………………. and you think Trump's the guy ripping off the people
How does that make sense to you ?
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Connecticut
[Chirp] [Chirp] [Chirp]........C-Mag wrote: ↑Fri Dec 21, 2018 3:21 amHe's the only POTUS in history that is worth less after attaining the office than before. He largely self funded his campaign and takes no pay for his service.
Let's look at Obama, the basically never had a job prior to becoming POTUS, never had any money to speak of, but left office worth $ 80 Million Dollars...……………………. and you think Trump's the guy ripping off the people
How does that make sense to you ?
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Connecticut
https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/local/ ... 480939.php
STAMFORD — It’s about fairness.
And maybe spying.
Recommended Video
But officials are poised to sign an agreement with a company that will use cameras, GPS tracking, license-plate readers, Connecticut and New York motor vehicle records, city databases and other information to identify
Stamford residents can help drive hunt for car-tax evaders
By Angela Carella Updated 12:09 pm EST, Thursday, December 20, 2018
29
The Board of Representatives will vote next month on hiring a company to identify cars belonging to Stamford residents that are not on city tax rolls. Photo: Matt Brown / Hearst Connecticut Media
Photo: Matt Brown / Hearst Connecticut Media
Image 1 of 5
The Board of Representatives will vote next month on hiring a company to identify cars belonging to Stamford residents that are not on city tax rolls.
STAMFORD — It’s about fairness.
And maybe spying.
Recommended Video
But officials are poised to sign an agreement with a company that will use cameras, GPS tracking, license-plate readers, Connecticut and New York motor vehicle records, city databases and other information to identify residents who don’t pay their car taxes.
Beyond that, residents may be able to report vehicles that have out-of-state plates but live in Stamford.
CT - on the path to Caracas....FUCK THIS STATE.Officials said they may consider a reporting hotline on the city’s website. Anyone who used it would not be “ratting on their neighbor,” Roqueta said.