Top 10 Reasons You Should Own An AR-15

[TheReal_ND]

Thank heavens you have all those road building deer herds in the countryside or how else would you find the resources to maintain those roads you intend to blockade come the glorious revolution?

*sniff* deer trails *spit*

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

All the rural retards have to do is block Amazon delivery vehicles and Starbucks coffee from the city folk before they kill each other with purple dragon dildos in a fit of rage.

It is a thin penumbra of order cast by law that keeps us from beating eachother to death with dildos.

the horror! the horror!

[Fife]

I'd say it's the Fed, but yeah.

[TheReal_ND]

Yes that is horrific. Only God's cleansing wrath can purge the cities of sodomites that abuse each other with rubber phalli to pass the time.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

I've been prayin' on the day Jesus comes back like a thief in the night, but, until then, this butt ain't gonna plug itself.

[TheReal_ND]

[C-Mag]

Fuck off hillbillies... we are trying to do civilization over here.

Now just imagine if some of those "hillbillies" were to, say, sabotage the feeds from the reservoirs that provide water to your large urban "civilization" areas, and suddenly places like NYC, L.A., SF, etc, didn't have enough water to supply their cities. And decide to stop producing the food they need.

How long would your "civilization" stay civilized?

H'yuck, we can jus kill all them city folks, with their book learnin' and whatnot.

Fuck off, hillbillie.

Philadelphia hit 50% HS grad rate and they threw a party. Dumb fucking urbanites live in fucking fantasy land. They live in a choked, polluted urban wasteland and think they are environmentally sound, they have miles of ghettos and millions of uneducated people, they stand in line for days for new I-phones, kill each other on big shopping days or when their sports ball teams wins...………………… then they delude themselves into thinking they are more intelligent than rural people.

There's a reason no one says, ' ya know when I retire, I want to move to a studio economy apartment in the center of the city'

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

We just as ej'cated as them city folks. And we got almost enough teeth to chaw too. Right after i finish up a'ruttin' muh sister, Ima get me an ur-ba-nite scalp, yes ma'am.

[C-Mag]

Venezuelans regret gun ban

CUCUTA, Venezuela

“Guns would have served as a vital pillar to remaining a free people, or at least able to put up a fight,” Javier Vanegas, 28, a Venezuelan teacher of English now exiled in Ecuador, told Fox News. “The government security forces, at the beginning of this debacle, knew they had no real opposition to their force. Once things were this bad, it was a clear declaration of war against an unarmed population.”

The law has only been in affect for 5 years.
The law took effect in 2013, with only minimal pushback from some pro-democracy opposition figures, banned the legal commercial sale of guns and munitions to all - except government entities.

Weapons were taken by force
Chavez initially ran a months-long amnesty program encouraging Venezuelans to trade their arms for electrical goods. That year, there were only 37 recorded voluntary gun surrenders, while the majority of seizures - more than 12,500 – were by force.

Venezuelans didn’t care enough about it.
The idea of having the means to protect your home was seen as only needed out in the fields. People never would have believed they needed to defend themselves against the government,” Vanegas explained. “Venezuelans evolved to always hope that our government would be non-tyrannical, non-violator of human rights, and would always have a good enough control of criminality.

Regret Set in Quickly
He said it didn’t take long for such a wide-eyed public perception to fall apart. “If guns had been a stronger part of our culture, if there had been a sense of duty for one to protect their individual rights, and as a show of force against a government power – and had legal carry been a common thing – it would have made a huge difference,” he lamented.

Same Old Lies and Propaganda
Although the bill was sold to the population as a hardline effort to improve security, and sharply reduce crime, many now point to Venezuela as a case study for how gun prohibition can actually produce the opposite effect.

Government backed gangs rule the streets
They were set up by the government to act as proxies and exert community control. They're the guys on the motorcycles in the poor neighborhoods, who killed any protesters,” said Vanessa Neumann, the Venezuelan-American president and founder of Asymmetrica, a Washington, D.C.-based political risk research and consulting firm. “The gun reform policy of the government was about social control. As the citizenry got more desperate and hungry and angry with the political situation, they did not want them to be able to defend themselves. It was not about security; it was about a monopoly on violence and social control

So while Venezuelan citizens were stripped of their legal recourse to bear arms, the “collectivos” – established by Chavez when came to power – were legally locked and loaded. Deemed crucial to the survival of the socialist dictatorship, the “collectivos” function to brutally subjugate opposition groups, while saving some face as they aren’t officially government forces, critics contend.



AN AR-15, not just a good idea, it's your Duty.


https://www.foxnews.com/world/venezuela ... -ourselves

Anyone still want guns banned ? It's wild how fast that went down. As soon as they had the law passed, Venezuela went totalitarian.

[Montegriffo]

Venezuelans regret gun ban

CUCUTA, Venezuela

“Guns would have served as a vital pillar to remaining a free people, or at least able to put up a fight,” Javier Vanegas, 28, a Venezuelan teacher of English now exiled in Ecuador, told Fox News. “The government security forces, at the beginning of this debacle, knew they had no real opposition to their force. Once things were this bad, it was a clear declaration of war against an unarmed population.”

The law has only been in affect for 5 years.
The law took effect in 2013, with only minimal pushback from some pro-democracy opposition figures, banned the legal commercial sale of guns and munitions to all - except government entities.

Weapons were taken by force
Chavez initially ran a months-long amnesty program encouraging Venezuelans to trade their arms for electrical goods. That year, there were only 37 recorded voluntary gun surrenders, while the majority of seizures - more than 12,500 – were by force.

Venezuelans didn’t care enough about it.
The idea of having the means to protect your home was seen as only needed out in the fields. People never would have believed they needed to defend themselves against the government,” Vanegas explained. “Venezuelans evolved to always hope that our government would be non-tyrannical, non-violator of human rights, and would always have a good enough control of criminality.

Regret Set in Quickly
He said it didn’t take long for such a wide-eyed public perception to fall apart. “If guns had been a stronger part of our culture, if there had been a sense of duty for one to protect their individual rights, and as a show of force against a government power – and had legal carry been a common thing – it would have made a huge difference,” he lamented.

Same Old Lies and Propaganda
Although the bill was sold to the population as a hardline effort to improve security, and sharply reduce crime, many now point to Venezuela as a case study for how gun prohibition can actually produce the opposite effect.

Government backed gangs rule the streets
They were set up by the government to act as proxies and exert community control. They're the guys on the motorcycles in the poor neighborhoods, who killed any protesters,” said Vanessa Neumann, the Venezuelan-American president and founder of Asymmetrica, a Washington, D.C.-based political risk research and consulting firm. “The gun reform policy of the government was about social control. As the citizenry got more desperate and hungry and angry with the political situation, they did not want them to be able to defend themselves. It was not about security; it was about a monopoly on violence and social control

So while Venezuelan citizens were stripped of their legal recourse to bear arms, the “collectivos” – established by Chavez when came to power – were legally locked and loaded. Deemed crucial to the survival of the socialist dictatorship, the “collectivos” function to brutally subjugate opposition groups, while saving some face as they aren’t officially government forces, critics contend.



AN AR-15, not just a good idea, it's your Duty.


https://www.foxnews.com/world/venezuela ... -ourselves

Anyone still want guns banned ? It's wild how fast that went down. As soon as they had the law passed, Venezuela went totalitarian.

Well, now you're conflating wanting some restrictions on gun ownership with banning guns.
Not very honest and a terrible starting point for any debate.
/shrug