-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25279
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Dec 13, 2018 8:12 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 7:56 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:51 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 4:54 pm
It's about honesty in this debate. People who just lie about others because they can't up their game or simply admit defeat are a cancer upon our forum.
Are you seriously going to deny she just deliberately lied?? I posted it! She deleted a link to a woman's essay and then accused me of writing the thesis of the essay so she could act outraged that a man dare opine upon what makes women happy. First of all, that was completely dishonest and beneath this forum. Second of all, it shouldn't matter who wrote the essay, man or woman. The idea that men can't have an opinion on women's happiness (and women clearly have opinions on everything that has to do with our lives) is pure sexism.
None of you can even respond to my post clearly showing this dishonest because you know for a fact how shitty she behaved.
shes responding to your post about what would make women happy. Not sure what you’re confused about.
She's responding to a post about an essay - written by a woman -- but accusing me of stating it and then acting outraged that a man has an opinion about what makes women happy. It's factually false (which is why she cut out the link to the essay in the first place), and it is sexist as hell anyway (the sex of a person making an opinion does not have any bearing on the veracity of the opinion).
It's fucking lying.
Just like she did yesterday by accusing me of wanting to control people's marriages.
I am so tired of the lying when certain people lose a debate.
Dude.. Read what you wrote. Nobody cares about the link, nobody likely even read it.
You did 3 paragraphs about what would make women happy, and she responded to it. Nobody else is confused here, or sees her post as dishonest.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Thu Dec 13, 2018 8:28 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 8:12 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 7:56 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:51 pm
shes responding to your post about what would make women happy. Not sure what you’re confused about.
She's responding to a post about an essay - written by a woman -- but accusing me of stating it and then acting outraged that a man has an opinion about what makes women happy. It's factually false (which is why she cut out the link to the essay in the first place), and it is sexist as hell anyway (the sex of a person making an opinion does not have any bearing on the veracity of the opinion).
It's fucking lying.
Just like she did yesterday by accusing me of wanting to control people's marriages.
I am so tired of the lying when certain people lose a debate.
Dude.. Read what you wrote. Nobody cares about the link, nobody likely even read it.
You did 3 paragraphs about what would make women happy, and she responded to it. Nobody else is confused here, or sees her post as dishonest.
I wrote three paragraphs about the implications of what that essay explains, and none of you had the integrity to even open the link and read any of it before shitting on me for defending myself against this lying bitch.
Again: I am tired of the lying. She obviously cannot debate me honestly. She is not even reading what I write. So she should just have the integrity to fuck right off and not respond to me. But instead she just lies about what I post constantly and it's getting annoying as fuck.
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25279
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Dec 13, 2018 8:39 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 8:28 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 8:12 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 7:56 pm
She's responding to a post about an essay - written by a woman -- but accusing me of stating it and then acting outraged that a man has an opinion about what makes women happy. It's factually false (which is why she cut out the link to the essay in the first place), and it is sexist as hell anyway (the sex of a person making an opinion does not have any bearing on the veracity of the opinion).
It's fucking lying.
Just like she did yesterday by accusing me of wanting to control people's marriages.
I am so tired of the lying when certain people lose a debate.
Dude.. Read what you wrote. Nobody cares about the link, nobody likely even read it.
You did 3 paragraphs about what would make women happy, and she responded to it. Nobody else is confused here, or sees her post as dishonest.
I wrote three paragraphs about the implications of what that essay explains, and none of you had the integrity to even open the link and read any of it before shitting on me for defending myself against this lying bitch.
Again: I am tired of the lying. She obviously cannot debate me honestly. She is not even reading what I write. So she should just have the integrity to fuck right off and not respond to me. But instead she just lies about what I post constantly and it's getting annoying as fuck.
Clearly, she responded to you directly, rather than arguing with whoever-the-fuck wrote whatever-the-fuck in your link, and that's upsetting you.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:40 am
She fucking lied twice in this thread, dude. Fuck off.
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:41 am
Ad tantrum fallacy.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:49 am
calling out a liar is not throwing a tantrum.
Attacking me personally for pages has only shown a small set of you cannot actually debate the argument I made. Which was you engaging in an actual fallacy, by the way. Attacking the man making an argument as a substitute for attacking the argument is fallacious.
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Fri Dec 14, 2018 5:50 am
Does repeatedly calling someone a liar count as a personal attack?
Are you ready to address her points yet or are you going to continue with your ad hominem fallacies?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Fri Dec 14, 2018 5:58 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Dec 14, 2018 5:50 am
Does repeatedly calling someone a liar count as a personal attack?
Are you ready to address her points yet or are you going to continue with your ad hominem fallacies?
Well, I am never defending you again when people behave like shit towards yourself.
This woman repeatedly lied in this thread about what I posted to avoid actual debate. It's absurd that you defend that. You can forget me ever sticking up for you on principle again. The people who constantly shit on you are probably laughing their asses off that I ever defended you on principle, since you have no principles yourself.
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Fri Dec 14, 2018 6:09 am
Well, that would make you look a hypocrite.
The difference is, only you think a bit of post editing was a personal attack.
Also since you regularly call me names what difference would it make if you did stop criticising others for doing it?
You think I've forgotten how recently you called me a fat pedo?
search.php?keywords=%2Bfat%2Bpedo
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Fri Dec 14, 2018 6:37 am
I showed clearly that she lied (twice). You lost any claim to demand decency and I will not stick up for you when other posters behave in a similar fashion towards yourself.
The lying and hypocrisy has gotten out of hand. Lurkers will see people simply lying and distorting, never bothering to read or respond to arguments made in good faith, and then members gas lighting each other about it happening. Who would want to take the time write out an argument in good faith when the only response will be some clown not reading it, responding to it with lies and straw man fallacies, and then her friends all attack them for pointing this out?
You do not stand for principles. You only want honesty and decency when it applies to you, and then engage in the very practices you condemn when others do it to you.