Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:25 amIncidentally, how would you vote if you were a member of the Conservative party ?
Brexit
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Brexit
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Brexit
Is it better for America if Britain is free and ruled by Brits, or if it is simply one more minor commonwealth of the EU?
I think it’s better for Britons to control Britain, but better for the USA if you just quietly submit to Germany er ... I mean the EU.
I think it’s better for Britons to control Britain, but better for the USA if you just quietly submit to Germany er ... I mean the EU.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Brexit
Hmm, so now you are voting against the interests of your own country.
Congratulations, you are a fully qualified Brexit supporter.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 2434
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm
Re: Brexit
You might think differently when the 4th Reich's new BritStaffel divisions invade the US as part of that new "EU army" they're pushing for.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Brexit
Anyone know which country was most consistent in fighting France and Germany's plans to federalise Europe?
Hint, leaving the EU will mean they have zero influence in the future policies of it.
Hint, leaving the EU will mean they have zero influence in the future policies of it.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Brexit
Nah. Good things happen in threes, right?Ph64 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:03 pmYou might think differently when the 4th Reich's new BritStaffel divisions invade the US as part of that new "EU army" they're pushing for.DBTrek wrote: I think it’s better for Britons to control Britain, but better for the USA if you just quietly submit to Germany er ... I mean the EU.
We’ll whoop Europe’s ass again. Hat trick on the World Wars. Only this time we won’t rebuild them. Let them claw their way back to the first world rather than riding our coattails back to civilization.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Brexit
Damn, if you thought Europe was the enemy it's no surprise you were tardy on both previous occasions. You were confused as to which side to join in on.DBTrek wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:10 pmNah. Good things happen in threes, right?Ph64 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:03 pmYou might think differently when the 4th Reich's new BritStaffel divisions invade the US as part of that new "EU army" they're pushing for.DBTrek wrote: I think it’s better for Britons to control Britain, but better for the USA if you just quietly submit to Germany er ... I mean the EU.
We’ll whoop Europe’s ass again. Hat trick on the World Wars. Only this time we won’t rebuild them. Let them claw their way back to the first world rather than riding our coattails back to civilization.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Brexit
Don't worry though. I'm sure you will make up for it by being right there at the start of WWIII.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Brexit
Were we confused in which side to join in on, or simply trying to determine which side was actually the lesser of two evils?Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:13 pmDamn, if you thought Europe was the enemy it's no surprise you were tardy on both occasions. You were confused as to which side to join in on.
Sure, we stopped Hitler and his Holocaust ... by helping a genocidal Stalin and aiding the long term advancement of cultural Marxism.
Can’t imagine why there was ever hesitation over getting involved in all that.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 2434
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm
Re: Brexit
Yeah, because you getting some MEPs in a parliament of 28(?) countries that has little power over the unelected leaders of the EU gives you sooo much influence now.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:08 pmAnyone know which country was most consistent in fighting France and Germany's plans to federalise Europe?
Hint, leaving the EU will mean they have zero influence in the future policies of it.
(Honestly we'd have been better off not getting into WWI. Likely a negotiated peace would have happened that would have stopped Hitler/WWII from ever happening... The USSR might not have gobbled up eastern europe...)
Last edited by Ph64 on Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.