Principal Banned for Trying to Ban Christmas
-
- Posts: 25408
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Principal Banned for Trying to Ban Christmas
Reading is hard.
-
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Principal Banned for Trying to Ban Christmas
Compared to what he calls me Cuntflop is a term of endearment.PartyOf5 wrote: Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:14 am
I added Monty after seeing you change ClubGOPs handle to be intentionally derogatory. You requested I use your proper spelling, yet you then go and twist others to be insulting. Bad form there bud.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.


-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Principal Banned for Trying to Ban Christmas
Then why did you post the definition when what allegedly meant was "your" definition? Are you trying to be Jesus carrying the cross by lugging those goalposts around constantly?Montegriffo wrote: Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:16 amPartyOf5 wrote: Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:14 amThat is nowhere in the definition you provided. You just contradicted yourself.
Now stop religiously appropriating the word eternity and leave it to those of us who actually believe and understand what eternity is.
-
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Principal Banned for Trying to Ban Christmas
Go back and see which bit of the definition I highlighted in red.PartyOf5 wrote: Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:24 amThen why did you post the definition when what allegedly meant was "your" definition? Are you trying to be Jesus carrying the cross by lugging those goalposts around constantly?Montegriffo wrote: Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:16 amPartyOf5 wrote: Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:14 am
That is nowhere in the definition you provided. You just contradicted yourself.
Now stop religiously appropriating the word eternity and leave it to those of us who actually believe and understand what eternity is.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.


-
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Re: Principal Banned for Trying to Ban Christmas
Ah, the school is sending enforcers to the students' homes and churches on Christmas, preventing them decking out their Christmas trees, celebrate mass, and sing carols in their own homes and private property?Speaker to Animals wrote: Sat Dec 08, 2018 5:01 am Yeah, an unconstitutional proscription against celebrating your religious holidays is exactly like people not pretending like you are a woman when you have a dick.![]()
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Principal Banned for Trying to Ban Christmas
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
-
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Re: Principal Banned for Trying to Ban Christmas
How is preventing "Christmas-related symbols" on school grounds a prohibition on the free exercise of religion? No contest on it being assholish, petty and patronizing towards those invisible masses supposedly "marginalized" by "Christmas symbols" (scary Christmas jumpers!).Speaker to Animals wrote: Sat Dec 08, 2018 9:01 am Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
- Posts: 25408
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Principal Banned for Trying to Ban Christmas
“Free expression” of something can’t happen unless state institutions “express” the same thing. Just imagine if Christianity had to go without the support of the BMV around December.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Principal Banned for Trying to Ban Christmas
The way it has been ruled down is that a government institution banning a religious practice is construed as "making a law respecting the establishment of a religion". What a government school cannot do is conduct religious ceremonies.BjornP wrote: Sat Dec 08, 2018 9:47 amHow is preventing "Christmas-related symbols" on school grounds a prohibition on the free exercise of religion? No contest on it being assholish, petty and patronizing towards those invisible masses supposedly "marginalized" by "Christmas symbols" (scary Christmas jumpers!).Speaker to Animals wrote: Sat Dec 08, 2018 9:01 am Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
Somehow I get the impression you faggots would see the problem if the school banned Ramadan posters or something.
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Principal Banned for Trying to Ban Christmas
I didn't see anything in the red highlighted part that states eternity is the length of your life.Montegriffo wrote: Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:28 am Go back and see which bit of the definition I highlighted in red.