Where's an Environmentalist when you need one

[nmoore63]

I always thought it weird that the vegans folks weren't way more into artificial.

Vegan is the opposite of organic, if you will.

---

Not to be confused with the folks that are simply anti the industrial meat industry.

[Hastur]

Vegans are anti human utopians.

[JohnDonne]

I always thought it weird that the vegans folks weren't way more into artificial.

Vegan is the opposite of organic, if you will.

---

Not to be confused with the folks that are simply anti the industrial meat industry.

Hmm, could you explain

[JohnDonne]

Vegans are anti human utopians.

You say this because sadly you think well-being is a zero sum game.

[nmoore63]

I always thought it weird that the vegans folks weren't way more into artificial.

Vegan is the opposite of organic, if you will.

---

Not to be confused with the folks that are simply anti the industrial meat industry.

Hmm, could you explain

Well our species eats meat.
To reject that is to reject our natural order. To rise above it in theory.

What's more beyond our nature than artificial products?

[Hastur]

Vegans are anti human utopians.

You say this because sadly you think well-being is a zero sum game.

Shhh. You have no idea what I think. Guess again.

[JohnDonne]

Vegans are anti human utopians.

You say this because sadly you think well-being is a zero sum game.

Shhh. You have no idea what I think. Guess again.

Why guess when I can read the nonsense you write?

[PartyOf5]

For example:
In a literal sense the sentence “killing animals for food is a part of life” is a true statement. Yes, within the world animals are routinely slaughtered. However, this is so obvious as to be banal.

You appear to need these obvious things pointed out to you.

In another, deeper sense,the statement could mean that nature does not comment on ethics, it merely exists, humans and animals are a part of nature, therefore humans killing animals is ethically fine. That would be mind-blowing, but wait, it’s obviously untrue. Humans make ethical judgments and decisions all the time, and killing animals for sheer taste is obviously a subject fraught with ethical concerns about man’s relationship to other creatures that can experience subjectively.

Now you're spouting bullshit. I'd explain what bullshit is to you, but that would be so banal.

[PartyOf5]

I've got venison thawed out and ready to go, and 2 dozen oysters. I need some quick info here.

Make jerky out of some of the venison.

[JohnDonne]

For example:
In a literal sense the sentence “killing animals for food is a part of life” is a true statement. Yes, within the world animals are routinely slaughtered. However, this is so obvious as to be banal.

You appear to need these obvious things pointed out to you.

In another, deeper sense,the statement could mean that nature does not comment on ethics, it merely exists, humans and animals are a part of nature, therefore humans killing animals is ethically fine. That would be mind-blowing, but wait, it’s obviously untrue. Humans make ethical judgments and decisions all the time, and killing animals for sheer taste is obviously a subject fraught with ethical concerns about man’s relationship to other creatures that can experience subjectively.

Now you're spouting bullshit. I'd explain what bullshit is to you, but that would be so banal.

Zing!
But oh, you've actually said nothing again.